Your Jesus is God is debunked over and over.
get over it.
I know you are just making a self-declaration and bare assertion that "Jesus is God is debunked" in a prideful manner. Maybe that's your way of reinforcing yourself or indoctrinating yourself. The fact is, if Jesus Christ is God was debunked, that would change the whole Christendom's Christological position, and that hasn't happened for about 2,000 years or less. You and I are not qualified. You're just some random internet poster that likes hanging out in CCAM or other apologetics platforms. Besides, based upon the testimony of Peter, Paul, and John. 2 Corinthians 13:1 "...Every matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.” Refutes you.
Let's say a Unitarian looked up in the New Testament of every Scriptures that says, "Jesus Christ," in order to find out who he is, then that Unitarian make a final conclusion that "Jesus Christ is man only". Or, maybe the Unitarian leaves the door open to the possibility that "Jesus Christ could be God too" according to the Bible. If that is the case, the first thing to do is encourage that Unitarian by re-examine further. What does the rest of the Scriptures have to say on the topic? As a Hypostatic Unionist, we believe that Jesus Christ is both God and Man simultaneously when Scriptures is taken as a whole. So what does a Unitarian do with the other Scriptures that teaches Jesus Christ is God? I predict (a self-fulfilling prophecy) that some Unitarians will restrict and isolate a verse or entire book, even isolate "Man from God" (Jesus Christ is man negates him being God) or "God from Man" (God is not a man negates Jesus Christ being God) by the whole Scriptures. Or do they ignore them, deny them, or try arguing for a different interpretation.
Here is the phrase in Greek and analysis: τοῦ Θεοῦ ἡμῶν καὶ σωτῆρος Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (2 Peter 1:1), and also, τοῦ μεγάλου Θεοῦ καὶ Σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ (Titus 2:13). According to the Granville Sharp’s rule, "When you have two nouns that are not proper names, which the two nouns are describing a subject, while the nouns is connected by the conjunction "and" so the first noun has the article "the" and the second noun does not,
both nouns are referring to the same subject."
1 Peter 1:1 Simon Peter, a servant and apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who through the righteousness of
our God and Savior Jesus Christ have received a faith as precious as ours: (NIV).
a). The two nouns θεοῦ (God) σωτῆρος (Savior)
b). The subject Ἰησοῦ (Jesus) Χριστοῦ (Christ)
c). The conjunction καὶ (and)
d). The first noun has a article τοῦ (the) θεοῦ (God)
e). The second noun has no article σωτῆρος (Savior)
f). That means "both nouns are referring to the same subject" Ἰησοῦ (Jesus) Χριστοῦ (Christ)
g). Therefore, "Jesus Christ is both God and Savior."
Titus 2:13 while we wait for the blessed hope—the appearing of the glory of
our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, (NIV).
a). The two nouns θεοῦ (God) Σωτῆρος (Savior)
b). The subject Χριστοῦ (Christ) Ἰησοῦ (Jesus)
c). The conjunction καὶ (and)
d). The first noun has a article τοῦ (the) θεοῦ (God)
e). The second noun has no article Σωτῆρος (Savior)
f). That means "both nouns are referring to the same subject" Χριστοῦ (Christ) Ἰησοῦ (Jesus)
g). Therefore, "Jesus Christ is both God and Savior."
Here is the phrase in Greek and analysis: Ἰησοῦ Χριστῷ οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ ἀληθινὸς Θεὸς καὶ ζωὴ αἰώνιος (1 John 5:20). According to the general rule on pronouns is that it modifies and refers to what is nearest or
the last subject mentioned which is the immediate antecedent.
1 John 5:20 We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true by being in his Son
Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.
a). The subject Ἰησοῦ Χριστῷ (Jesus Christ)
b). The pronoun οὗτός (He)
c). The first conjunct ἀληθινὸς Θεὸς (true God)
d). The conjunction καὶ (and)
e). The second conjunct ζωὴ αἰώνιος (life eternal)
f). That means "the last subject mentioned which is the immediate antecedent" Ἰησοῦ Χριστῷ (Jesus Christ)
g). Therefore, "Jesus Christ is both God and Eternal."
Here is a logical analytical critique and assessment: A logical conjunction is consisting of two statements joined by the connective "and" (a truth-functional operator ^) to form a compound sentence. While the two statements flanking each other are called conjuncts. Now the word "both" is a predeterminer and always preceding the conjunction, in this particular case the conjunction is an "and," while the coordinating conjunction connects words, phrases, or sentences together called a compound sentence.
The Logical Conjunction rules, states: "The whole conjunction G ^ S is true, that's if both conjuncts are true, otherwise, the whole conjunction is automatically false".
a). The whole conjunction G ^ S is true, only if both G is true and S is true.
b). The whole conjunction G ^ S is False, only if G is true and S is false.
c). The whole conjunction G ^ S is False, only if G is false and S is true.
d). The whole conjunction G ^ S is false, only if both G is false and S is false.
Conjunction Introduction (^I): G, S |- G ^ S
also G, E |- G ^ E
1 Peter 1:1 and Titus 2:13
Proposition A. Jesus Christ is God.
Proposition B. Jesus Christ is Savior.
Proposition C. Therefore, Jesus Christ is both God and Savior.
Also 1 John 5:20
Proposition A. Jesus Christ is God.
Proposition B. Jesus Christ is Eternal.
Proposition C. Therefore, Jesus Christ is both God and Eternal.
Conjunction Elimination (^E): G ^ S |- G
and G ^ S |- S
also G ^ E |- G
and G ^ E |- E
1 Peter 1:1 and Titus 2:13
Proposition A. Jesus Christ is both God and Savior.
Proposition B. Therefore, Jesus Christ is God.
And
Proposition A. Jesus Christ is both God and Savior.
Proposition B. Therefore, Jesus Christ is Savior.
Also 1 John 5:20
Proposition A. Jesus Christ is both God and Eternal.
Proposition B. Therefore, Jesus Christ is God.
And
Proposition A. Jesus Christ is both God and Eternal.
Proposition B. Therefore, Jesus Christ is Eternal.
Let CCAM record show any Unitarian's denial.