• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Is TULIP biblical?

And this passage is not dealing with the regeneration of the Spirit but His indwelling.
Regeneration includes indwelling. Forgiveness of sin and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit is regeneration.
 
Regeneration includes indwelling. Forgiveness of sin and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit is regeneration.
They are distinct actions.
 
Last edited:
That was in response to his following comment:
This CCAF seems to depreciate all other inputs and any or all disagreements are met with hostility-especially from the Staff Admins.
I do not see that disagreements are met with hostility certainly not by staff admins. I do see the ability of the Reformed on the site to counter all the depreciating of Calvinism brought forth, with thought through biblical counters, often eventually met by someone or other with hostility that is voiced publically and against the rules, with name calling and character assassination. Then when staff warns them for their infractions, they turn on the staff member and blame them, and continue to break the rules. That is the reason this OP was posted. There are some who come because they know there are Reformed here and it is one of the few places where they are not ridiculed and attacked for their beliefs, and they perhaps come with the intent of depreciating it. Personally, I think it is great the A'ist leaning folks are here.

If a truth is being presented the arguments against it with biblical support will eventually run out---even though the argument may continue on and on. It is when those arguments run out that personal attacks having nothing to do with the subject take their place. And the one who has reached this point says or actually believes that continuing to be able to counter all that is put forth against their view is hostility. And so they accuse their opponent of hostility.

You are doing a great job. Continue to stand your ground. :love:
 
It is close but not totally. Below is a outline preached by a good friend of mine back maybe fifteen years ago that I heard this sermon and have saved it for reference. I think I might first heard him preached this back in the late eighties.

I have never understood the Calvinist concept that the Sovereignty of God precludes the free will of man. It is in His sovereignty that He created the human being with free will. I see nothing in all of Scripture that says that to be false or that anything ever happened that caused God to change creation. In fact, Genesis 2:3 strongly suggests that He changed nothing of His creation.
 
Unconditional Election Unconditional Election is also based in the misunderstandings that the 'Total Depravity' teaching brings in; since man, in His sin, cannot accept the free gift of Salvation, then God chose (elected) some to be regenerated or enlightened by the Holy Spirit so they can believe and be saved, whereas others he chooses not to regenerate or enlighten, so they still can't believe, and hence they stand condemned.

However, scripture gives a different presentation of election: The nation of Israel was elect due to God’s own choice (Ezek 16:5-7). Israel entered the covenant with God to confirm this (Deut 29:9-15), but they still rebelled, and thought salvation was by works and not the promise. More importantly, in regards to salvation: God elected a people for Himself, the body of Christ, both Jew and Gentile. (I Pet 2:7-10, Rom 1:1-3, II Tim 2:1-13, etc). His calling this people is by His grace, not by any of our own works (I Pet 2:9-10, Eph 2:8-10, Rom 11:1-6).
It must be noted here that the first line of this is basing what follows on an assumed premise. That being that the true teachings of total depravity are the same as those that are stated by the one opposing it. And that the misunderstandings are in the actual doctrine and not in what they are saying about the doctrine. And then it is stated that because of what they are presuming about that is why the doctrine of unconditional election is wrong. When in fact if all the misunderstandings of the doctrine are not actually in the doctrine but are misunderstandings of the doctrine, the entire argument becomes null and void.

The truth of the matter is that it is the theology behind the doctrine of total depravity that does indeed lead of necessity to unconditional election. But that does not mean that it is wrong. These doctrines are theology based---the study of God---not man based--- anthropology based---the study of man.

So, stating the doctrine of the T correctly and not as is done as being that man cannot accept the free gift of salvation, we have a different outcome. It does not teach that salvation is ever a gift, free or otherwise. It teaches, as the Bible does, that faith to believe is a gift. It is available to all in that it is not withheld from any. It is not secret. It is written down in a Book. God Himself sent Jesus, and revealed Him as the Redeemer, and said in order to have eternal life and inherit the kingdom of God, they must believe and trust in His person and work.

And since mankind through his own doing is at enmity with God, too sinful to even approach Him, and since in his corrupted state, he has no desire to therefore will not violate his own will, and cannot even understand the spiritual things taught in the gospel, dead in his tresspasses and sins as He is, a bonafide member of the kingdom of darkness, held there in chains, Someone must rescue him, and take him out of the kingdom of darkness and bring Him into the Son of His love. (Col 1:9-14)

There is only one way that can be done and that is by God Himself through the substitutionary work of Jesus the Son of God. And since not all are saved but some are, and Jesus would not die potentially but definitively, and for those He was sent to redeem, those He says the Father gave Him, God must necessarily choose those to give Him. They cannot choose themselves. He even says He knew them before the foundation of the world. He says they were foreknown, predestined, called, glorified. The unconditional part is that it is not based on anything the individual has done either good or bad. That does not mean it is arbitrary. God has a reason and it is for the good pleasure of His will. He does not say what that good pleasure of His will is.

As for the second part that states the election is not about individuals but the church, all the scriptures given to support that assumption, deal with the individuals in the church. They were elected to be the church. The individuals have to be called first.

And Israel did not enter a covenant with God, God made a covenant with Israel.
 
What do you think regeneration is?
The Holy Spirit changing the heart of a person, a new and soft heart, who does not reject the things of God but hears and believes them.
 
I have never understood the Calvinist concept that the Sovereignty of God precludes the free will of man. It is in His sovereignty that He created the human being with free will. I see nothing in all of Scripture that says that to be false or that anything ever happened that caused God to change creation. In fact, Genesis 2:3 strongly suggests that He changed nothing of His creation.
Our will is free to choose what it most desires. It is not free to choose what it does not most desire. That holds true in all areas.
 
That only means that the work that Jesus spoke about was different from the work that Paul was speaking when he said that salvation is by faith not works. Specifically, the works that Paul spoke about was works of law. No matter how you understand the idea of "faith not works", Jesus' teaching on this subject in passages like that including John 6:29 is that believing in God is something that you do.
John 6:29 actually says "the work of God." Notice He changed their works into work. And of course we do the actual believing. Where does it say anything about choosing anything, or how we come to believe?
Granted does not mean and only mean enabled.
It does mean given here as the context shows. They couldn't do it unless it was given to them by the Father to do so.
To give, render, or grant graciously does not preclude a gift being conditional.
Does it say it is conditional?
Nothing about God's good pleasure spoken of in Philippians 2:13 eliminates the works being initiated by the person doing the works. And there is nothing in that verse which prevents God from working in the unregenerate, both will and to work for his good pleasure.
Yes it does. It says it is God who as work in you. And as everyone is on a level playing field of being unregenerate God always works in the unregenerate to regenerate them. In Eph 2 He says He quickens the to life. While they are dead in trespassess and sins.
 
Limited Atonement This teaching holds that Christ's sacrifice was sufficient for all, but it wasn't efficacious for all; that Jesus only bore the sins of the elect; that Christ only died for some, not all.

However, scripture presents that Christ died for all, and God desires all men to be saved (I John 2:2, I Tim 2:4, John 12:32, John 4:4-42, John 10:9, John 3:16-17, Rev 22:17, Matt 11:28, Ti 2:11, etc) Jesus was a perfect sacrifice, offering complete propitiation to appeasing the wrath of God for all who believe (Rom 1:16-17).
Arminianism teaches the same limitation of His sacrifice, they just apply it in a different way. To them it is limited to those who choose to believe, but at the same time He died for all individuals without exception. Reformed theology does not have that oxymoron. He died for those God gave Him which was the intended purpose of the cross.

1 John 2:2 Obviously Jesus was not propitiate for the sins of the whole world so this verse cannot mean the whole world as every individual without exception. And the caveat of the limitation must be applied before the crucifixion, not after it, which Ar'ism does. "But only for those who choose Christ." It has to be applied before the life, death, and resurrection of Christ and it must be applied by God, not man's speculation. Those He chose, those He gave to Christ, those He predestined to faith in Christ, those He called. And in order to make this certain, He must regenerate those He predestined.

And since we know that the gospel was intended to go to Jew and Gentile alike, world here must mean all nations and types of people.

1 Tim 2:4 Partial sentences remove from its previous context does not a truth or doctrine make. So lets deal with what Paul is dealing with. Verses 1-4 Paul is telling Timothy who we are to pray for. First of all, then I urge that supplications, prayers, intercession, and thanksgiving be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way. So the all in verse 4 is the same all as in verse 1 and means all types of people even those who have power over us. If it were God's desire that all people be saved they would be. We must not produce a doctrine that suggests that our will overrides the desires of God.

Rather than go through each of the scriptures given, suffice it to say that they must be interpreted in light of what the whole counsel of God tells us, and especially about who He says He is. We cannot make one scripture contradict others as a wrong interpretation of these scriptures does. They contradict those that say God's word always accomplishes that for which He sends it out. And many others.
 
Irresistible Grace In short, this is the teaching that there is an 'internal call' to salvation by the Holy Spirit that cannot be resisted, as such anyone that God calls to Him cannot refuse.

However, as most easily seen by Israel's continual rebellion, God rarely stops people from rebelling, disobeying, or ignoring conviction (Acts 7:51-53, Deut 30:11-20, Josh 15:14-28, Luke 6:46, Luke 9:5).
The doctrine contained within irresistible grace is that God's grace in bringing a person to salvation is effectual. It accomplished exactly what He intends for it to accomplish. It has nothing to do with resisting that grace. It teaches that since the TULI is true God must have a way of changing an unrepentant heart into a repentant one that is, of changing the desires of those (all without exception) who by nature have no desire for Christ into one who does desire Christ. If we could do this ourselves, we would not need Jesus. This action of the Holy Spirit is called being born again from above in John 3. Another word for it is regenerated. When this happens we hear the gospel and when we hear it we believe it. That is the grace of it.

Acts 7:51-53 Resisting the Holy Spirit is not the issue. The issue is whether or not we can resist His grace in bringing us to salvation.
Deut 30:11-20 Different covenant, different type of covenant, different mediator. A covenant of Law compared to a covenant of grace---no law. What is forgotten often enough is that now the only way to approach God or be in a covenant relationship with Him is through Christ. This is the way we find God. This is the way we trust in God and have faith in Him. And that by grace. Not Law.
Josh 1:14-18 Right. They were put to death for rebelling. Irresistible grace does not teach that God stops us from sinning. Being in Christ stops sin from condemning us because Jesus to the just punishment for our sins upon Himself.
Luke 6:46 Has no relationship as to refuting the doctrine of effectual grace.
Luke 9:5 And wherever they do not receive you, when you leave that town shake off the dust from your feet as a testimony against them. Effectual grace does not teach that it is given to everyone who hears the good news. It teaches if is effectual for those that God has elected unto salvation. The "few who are chosen." out of the many who are called (hear the gospel.)
Rather, God commands everyone to repent, Christ draws all men to Himself, and the Holy Spirit is given to all who believe and also helps us testify to Christ (Acts 6:8-12, John 15:26-27). We still can refuse, but we remain under condemnation if we do so (John 3:16-17).
Not a single one of those verses says any form of the word decide or choose. It is the requirement and duty of everyone as created by God and in His image and likeness to repent of wrongdoing. But does he by nature want to do so? And if he does not want to how is his own will going to make him do so? Something good must happen to him first. Something he cannot do himself. He does not even know he needs to repent or that he has done anything that offends God.
Perseverance of the Saints The last point is quite complicated, but teaches that the individuals that God chooses and then draws (see above points) will then persevere in their faith to the end.

Conversely, scripture shows that belief must be continuous abiding, not a one time decision (John 3:16, Mk 16:16, John 15:1-17, Luke 8:4-15, I John 5:3-5).
All those scriptures would need to be justified against these:
John 8:29; John 6:39. They would have to be justified against our sealing in Christ by the Holy Spirit; the fact that we were purchased by the very blood of the Son of God. And they can be, easily if one really knows their Bible deeply instead of superficially, only viewing it through the one lens they have always used as A'ist. But the justification of those verses cannot be done the other way around, making those things I listed to not mean what they quite clearly mean. We cannot have contradictions of doctrinal truth in the Bible. If we do, something is off somewhere and needs to be addressed.
 
The Holy Spirit changing the heart of a person, a new and soft heart, who does not reject the things of God but hears and believes them.
Oh my, not even close.

Regeneration is the bringing of the spirit, dead in trespasses and sins, to life again and the giving of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
 
Perseverance of the Saints The last point is quite complicated, but teaches that the individuals that God chooses and then draws (see above points) will then persevere in their faith to the end.

Conversely, scripture shows that belief must be continuous abiding, not a one time decision (John 3:16, Mk 16:16, John 15:1-17, Luke 8:4-15, I John 5:3-5).
Sounds like you have a TULIP and a DAISY.
The TULIP theology says once saved always saved....while the DAISY theology says you can lose your salvation.

 
Oh my, not even close.

Regeneration is the bringing of the spirit, dead in trespasses and sins, to life again and the giving of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
Where does scripture say that? It says He brings people who are dead in trespasses and sins, to life again., not just our spirit. Our bodies will die unless Jesus returns first, but they too will be resurrected to life. And who is it that does the regenerating? Ask Jesus. He explains it to Nicodemus in John 3, and tells him that no one can even see the kingdom of God, let alone enter it, unless He is regenerated first. Jesus is the Life. We receive that life by being placed in Him. We are placed in Him by being regenerated---made holy and clean. We cannot be in Him while we are still a sinner.
 
Where does scripture say that?
Tit 3:5 he saved us, ......., by the washing of regeneration and renewal by the Holy Spirit,
It says He brings people who are dead in trespasses and sins, to life again., not just our spirit.
Regeneration is about our spirits. Our bodies are not dead in trespasses and sins. It is the spirit that is born again. It is the spirit that is reborn to its original living condition; reborn to the condition it was when God formed it in us when we were born.
Our bodies will die unless Jesus returns first, but they too will be resurrected to life. And who is it that does the regenerating? Ask Jesus. He explains it to Nicodemus in John 3, and tells him that no one can even see the kingdom of God, let alone enter it, unless He is regenerated first.
There are no dead spirits in the kingdom. To enter the kingdom requires a spirit alive and well, regenerated to life again by the forgiveness of sin and the giving of the gift of the Holy Spirit., i.e., the indwelling Holy Spirit.
 
Tit 3:5 he saved us, ......., by the washing of regeneration and renewal by the Holy Spirit,
Just to keep our discussion flowing without having to backtrack this answer refers to your comment below.
Regeneration is the bringing of the spirit, dead in trespasses and sins, to life again and the giving of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
To which I asked you where it said that? To make it even more clear, before that you had asked me what I thought regeneration was and I replied.
The Holy Spirit changing the heart of a person, a new and soft heart, who does not reject the things of God but hears and believes them.
And you told me I was not even close and gave your definition above. Which by the way. separates people into independant parts when they are a whole being of which their body is included. Our mind's/ heart's may be what motivates a choice to sin, but our bodies do the sinning.

Titus 3:5 is the middle of a sentence that began in verse 4 and ended in verse 7. This is not how we are meant to arrive at any doctrine or belief and not how we are meant to support what we are saying. Even if we begin in chapter 3 verse 1, it is not enough, for that is only a small part of the body of the letter Paul is writing to Titus. If we start with the beginning of the body of the letter where Paul states his purpose in writing, we find that he is instructing Titus concerning churches in Crete where he had left Titus. Titus 1:5-6 This is why I left you in Crete, so that you might put what remained into order, and appoint elders in every in every town as I directed you---if anyone is above reproach, the husband of one wife, and his children are believers and not open to the charge of debauchery of subordination.

Paul then gives further instructions and in 3:3 he gives a brief reason for why those appointed should do and be as what he says in 1-2. And in verse 4 further reason that relates to our position before God as His children and how we came to be in that position. So when we come to "by the washing and renewal of the Holy Spirit" we are seeing what was done for us, the washing and renewal of the Holy Spirit, but are not being given a description of how that is done by the Holy Spirit or the order in which it is done. It does not work as a proof text for what you say it does. "Proof texts" seldom do.

To find out the order of this occurrence if you will, and thereof what regeneration is, the easiest place to go is John 3 because this is the place that Jesus had this very discussion with Nicodemus. I will pull out the highlights pertinent to the subject to save space. It is available for all to read in its entirety.

In verses 1-2 we have Nicodemus coming to Jesus with not a question at all but a statement, acknowledging that Jesus was a teacher come from God. Jesus responded to this in a way, considering what followed, that in the mind of Nicodemus, as was the case with those of Abraham's natural descent, it was human status before God that mattered and being of Abraham was the way into the kingdom of God, because His reply was, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God." Then we have the question of Nicodemus, still thinking in human terms, and not understanding what the Law and the Prophets taught, as a teacher of the Law himself, he should have known, which Jesus later chastised him for; "How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother's womb and be born?"

So Jesus explains further. "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." He was not speaking of a physical rebirth but of a spiritual rebirth. And He further explains "Do not marvel that I said to you, "You must be born again. The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit." This shows that this new birth is invisible and is done by the will of God through the Holy Spirit, and no human knows where it comes from and where it goes. Definite selection by God.

Nicodemus as a teacher of the Law and Prophets (OT) should have known what Jesus was referring to when He said "born of water and the Spirit" because it was a direct reference to OT scriptures in the Prophets on that very thing and was a reference there to cleansing by the Holy Spirit, which was at that time signified by the washings in the Law.

Having said all this, Jesus makes a dramatic statement of who He is, what He came to do and how He was going to do it in verses 13-14. His announcement to Nicodemus that the One who stood before Him was the promises suffering servant, the Messiah, the Redeemer, who was promised in the Law and Prophets, not merely a teacher of the Law, as Nicodemus had begun this conversation affirming.

And then we come to verse 16 which tells us the why of it, and the how of it as applied to those mentioned in verse 8, and is almost always removed from this context and used to prove what the context does not say. "For God so loved the world, that He gave his only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life." In doing this they forget all about Jesus speaking of the new birth, and the fact that that is entirely in God's hands as to where it goes, and that no one can either see or enter the kingdom of God unless that occurs. And turn what Jesus said completely on it head by focusing on one word, and that being "whoever", and determine that word indicates a choice by the person that causes the Holy Spirit to rebirth them in Christ. Even though Jesus Himself had just said the opposite.

That is how one finds out what regeneration is.
 
I need to respond to that. I will be going in for open heart surgery tomorrow and I have some things I need to do in preparation for that. If I don't forget, I will come back to this when I get back home. It is important, since it is actually the only place in the whole of the Bible that regeneration is used with respect to the spiritual.
 

Is TULIP biblical?​

Are you a "Calvinist", then YES. "It's the word of GOD!!!"

Are you NOT a "Calvinist", then it's only partially accurate.

It's only "Theology" after all.
 
Regeneration is about our spirits. Our bodies are not dead in trespasses and sins. It is the spirit that is born again. It is the spirit that is reborn to its original living condition; reborn to the condition it was when God formed it in us when we were born.
Regeneration is about our hearts as it is most frequently used in the Bible kardia. It denotes a person's center for both physical and emotional-intellectual-moral activities. (1 Sam 16:7; Prov 25:3; Jer 17:10; 1 Cor 4:5) It is the engine that drives the spirit and the body in a manner of speaking.
Biblical application of spirit according to Bakers: an incorporeal, feeling, and intelligent being. It is a spiritual component, given by God, probably at conception. Our spirit in conjunction with our brain, gives us the power of mind, grants us the capacity to think, reason, learn, create, make choices, be self aware.

Ez 11:19-20 And I will give them one heart and anew spirit I will put within them. I will remove the heart of stone from their flesh and give them a heart of flesh, that they may walk in my statutes and keep my rules and obey them.

Jer 31:33
This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time," declares the Lord. "I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. Also quoted in Hebrews 8:10.

Our bodies are subject to death and the wrath of God because of sin and this is the sense in which it is used concerning our bodies. It is the condition of our heart that drives and directs our spirit. Our spirit does what it does according to what is in the heart. What is in the heart becomes the same thing that is in our spirit and our body. We function as one complete being, not separate parts each doing its own thing.

When we are given a new heart---which is regeneration---our spirit which was dead to the spiritual things of God, because our hearts were corrupted against Him, has now by grace and the power of God, been made new and turns to God and the spiritual things of God, and our spirit follows suit. We can now understand and believe spiritual things that we could not before, being dead as we were, in our trespasses and sins.
 
Back
Top