It seems anyone can say anything they want about me and it is fine but I can not say anything in response without it being wrong. where is the fairness.
Notice, just as
@Arial has noted, that you are not answering the questions. You are not engaging, but only repeating yourself, and, now, complaining.
I posted one scripture 2 Peter 3:
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
and she said I posted 'collapsing of categories' I did not post any other scripture so how could it collapsed she is the one that brought in another scripture so she is the one that collapsed it.
Your use of that one verse was in comparison with the other, as I remember, concerning "all" necessarily meaning everyone. Nevertheless, that is immaterial. She was not, as I said, referring to scripture, but to your use of scripture, in collapsing categories. I'll let her explain more specifically. But I call it employing a category error, or conflating categories.
Just really do not understand you all logic here sorry not trying to get banned but really do not understand the logic.
There's mostly only two problems that get people banned here, and those are after long long trails of the same failure on their part to engage substantively with the rebuttals but instead to repeat their same faulty arguments. The other is for repeatedly assaulting other members, (usually staff), with complaints, as if that was helping their arguments. There are plenty other reasons, but those are the most common, I think. This site exists for the purpose of debate and discussion, not off topic commentary on fairness or other complaints.
And, to be fair, if you were staff, you too would admit some degree of hypocrisy, I think. I do. I try not to be hypocritical, but I admit I am. I tell people don't expect fairness. You don't get it in life, and you won't get it here. Just be here, (if you are here), for the purpose of discussion and debate. Please, as you have been asked before, engage with the substance of the arguments, without repeating yourself ad nauseum. It is our job to moderate, which we do by several different means, the most common of which to speak directly to the issues with simple rebuke or suggestion, without assessing penalties or editing text. It is what staff is supposed to do.
So far, what I keep hearing you repeat, whether in so many words or by underlying assumption, is that the 'surface reading' or 'plain reading' is the Word of God, and thus, what you read is all we should be considering, as it looks at first pass. THAT is either directly, or indirectly, your claim and your defense of your theology. I don't even know if you can see how that is circular reasoning.
The choosing is in Christ — not apart from Him.
