Naw, it's your intelligence.
I'll be honest I don't know how to respond to compliments but I do thank you for the praise, though certainly I feel reasonably average.. Since we are on new footing after the mix up, I have gone ahead and tried to be more clear.
Firstly, thank you for the clarification and correction regarding the earlier phrasing. I'm grateful we’re aligning on Romans 12:20—“heap burning coals” (anthrakas pyros sōreuseis)—as an expression of love toward enemies in a distinctly biblical way. This directive, drawn from Proverbs 25:21–22, calls us to love as God commands, not as the world defines, with the aim of leading enemies either to repentance or to the vindication of God's justice. There’s no bypassing Matthew 5:44 here. Love for enemies, rightly ordered, is not weakness but obedience, always directed toward God’s glory.
The biblical order of love is unambiguous. Christ Himself sets the standard in Matthew 22:37–39: first, love for God with the entirety of one’s being (agapēseis Kurion ton Theon sou, cf. Deut. 6:5, ahav), then love for neighbor as oneself (Lev. 19:18, v’ahavta l’reakha kamokha). This is not a matter of sentiment but covenant obedience. Loving God means keeping His commandments (1 John 5:3, agapē tou Theou), including the Royal Law to love one’s neighbor (Jas. 2:8, agapēseis ton plēsion). Romans 13:8 affirms this—“love fulfills the law” (ho agapōn nomon peplērōken)—but the directionality is key: it begins with God and flows outward, not the reverse.
Regarding neighbors, the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25–37) rightly illustrates neighborly compassion (esplanchnisthē), but context matters. Neighbors are not abstract; they are those God places in our path—local, tangible, covenant-proximate. Gospel proclamation must come first (Mark 16:15, kēryxate to euaggelion), for reconciliation to God is the deepest expression of love (2 Cor. 5:18–19, katallagē). Physical care follows, not replaces, this priority (Jas. 2:15–16). To invert this—to neglect local, unsaved souls for distant causes—is not biblical love but worldly moralism dressed up in virtue.
Finally, love must be distinguished: the natural man’s “love” is at enmity with God (Rom. 8:7, echthra eis Theon). True love—agapē—prioritizes the household of faith (Gal. 6:10, oikeious tēs pisteōs) and our own families (1 Tim. 5:8, oikeiōn) before extending to the world. Enemies may yet be elect, like Saul of Tarsus (Acts 9:1–5), which is why kindness (Rom. 12:20) and prayerful witness (1 Pet. 2:12) are acts of faith in God’s justice (Ps. 89:14, tsedeq) and grace (Matt. 5:45, tous ponērous). Love and justice converge supremely at the cross (Rom. 3:26, dikaios). Though sin reigns through both imputation (Rom. 5:17) and personal failure (Rom. 5:12; Rom. 7:18–19), our obedience is accepted only through Christ’s righteousness (Rom. 5:18–19), as the Westminster Confession rightly asserts (16.5).
As for covenant, I hold to a unified Abrahamic covenant, fulfilled in Christ (Gen. 12, 15, 17; berit), and applied under the New Covenant with the law now written on our hearts (Jer. 31:33, torah). This covenantal structure shapes how we define and prioritize love.
So, do we differ in how love intersects with covenant theology, or in how we weigh law, grace, and proximity?
Let’s continue to sharpen one another as iron sharpens iron—for the glory of God alone.