The problem is not the prophecy it’s the spiritualizing of the fulfillments that were literal . Many are still future and scripture never stated they were fulfilled like with the 70ad false interpretations. Revelation was written after 70ad. They must even change the date of its writing to make their eschatology fit. There are so many errors within the amil system . It’s why I am so reject Covenant theology for the spiritualizing of similar texts concerning Israel. I Believe exactly like MacArthur that way. I use to debate it up through around 2015 on the old carm forums. :
It seems the apostles, our
authority for Christian doctrine, are not in agreement with you regarding "spiritualizing" texts, as in:
1)
Ro 9:24-26,
1 Pe 2:10 - where both Paul and Peter state that Israel is
not the people of God (Hos 1:9), and that the promise to make them his people again (Hos 2:23) is
fulfilled in the
Gentiles. Paul and Peter are "spiritualizing" the OT text of Hos 2:23.
2)
Heb 8:6-13, 10:15-18 - where Paul says the promise to Israel of a new covenant (Jer 31:31-34) is fulfilled in the Gentile church, which is the
true Israel.
3)
Heb 11:10, 13, 16 - where Paul says the everlasting possession promised to Abraham (Ge 17:8), was not earthly land, but a heavenly city (11:13) of eternal land/life (Jn 11:24-25). Paul is "spiritualizing" the OT texts of Jer 31:31-34 and Ge 17:8.
4)
Ac 15:13-18 - where James says the promise (Am 9:11-12) to rebuild
David's tent is
fulfilled in God taking to himself a people from the
Gentiles. James is "spiritualizing" the OT text Am 9:11-12.
5)
1 Co 10:1-4 - where Paul says that Israel was baptized in the cloud, the manna was spiritual food, the water from the rock was spiritual drink, and the rock itself was Christ. Paul is "spiritualizing" the OT texts of Ex 14:22, 16:4, 17:6.
6)
Dt 10:16, 30:6, Jer 4:4, 9:25-26, Ro 2:26-29 - where God says the circumcision of Ge 17:10-14 must be
spiritual circumcision, and Paul says that only those who are
spiritually circumcised (faith in Jesus Christ through the new birth of the Holy Spirit) are true Jews, that the rest of the Jews were not really Jews in the eyes of God. So God himself and Paul often "spiritualize" the text of Ge 17:10-14.
7)
Heb 3:7-4:11 - where Paul says going into Canaan was only a partial and temporary entering into God's rest (Dt 12:10, 25:19), so that there remains a "spiritual" entering into God's (salvation) rest through faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Paul is "spiritualizing" the OT texts of Dt 12:10, 25:19, Nu 14:30, Ps 95:7-11.
8)
Gal 3:16 - where Paul "spiritualizes" the
physical seed of Abraham as
spiritual seed of the church.
9)
Gal 4:26-27 - where Paul "spiritualizes" the text of Isa 54:1 regarding Sarah (the "mother" of Israel) as fulfilled in the NT church (Gal 4:26-27).
10) And then there is the "allegorizing" of the
Passover Festival (Ex 12:12-20) in 1 Co 5:7-8,
birth of Abraham's sons, Ishmael and Isaac (Ge 16:3-4, 21:1-3) in Gal 4:21-23,
substitute ram (Ge 22:13) as the resurrection of Isaac (Heb 11:19).
The objection to "spiritualizing" or allegorizing the text does not have its basis in the Bible, for the NT writers often "spiritualize" or allegorize the OT texts. In fact, to the NT writers, a
correct understanding of the OT often
required "spiritualizing" the text.
Are we more wise than the NT writers that we should forbid the OT to be interpreted spiritually?
It is that refusal which is the source of so much contra-NT teaching in dispensationalism, which, by the way, is new to the church in the last 200 years.
The popularity of dispenstionalism has done much damage to the Christology and eccelesiology of the bride of the Lamb, the NT church, God's whole purpose in creation.