• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

A Question for the Calvinist

Good point. False equivalence on my part.
 
Ah, but Christ came in the flesh, born under the Law to fulfill it and to condemn sin in the flesh. Galatians 4:4 But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law, 5 to redeem those who were under the law
Christ fulfilling the law is not about "keeping" the law, but about fulfilling the purpose/goal/end of the law (his redemption and righteousness through faith in him).
 
Christ fulfilling the law is not about "keeping" the law, but about fulfilling the purpose/goal/end of the law (his redemption and righteousness through faith in him).
Eleanor, never-mind there is a reason why the Last Adam had to fulfill the broken Covenant of Works. That's for you to research and do your own homework.
 
Back
Top