• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

What and when is the thousand years? Part 4

There are two sets of 1000 years one the reigning and one the binding.
No, there are not two separate thousand year periods in Revelation 20. Check the Greek. Revelation 20:2 first speaks of "...and bound him A thousand years" as "Chilia ete". Then in every subsequent mention of the term "thousand years" in Revelation 20, it refers BACK to the original use of the term in Revelation 20:2 by using the definite article "THE thousand years" (Ta chilia ete).

This is called "the rule of first mention" in grammar, and it makes every mention of the thousand years in Revelation 20 to be related to the same time period - not two separate time periods.
 
Deceived about what is the question?

If the great chain is what binds satan then what is the great chain and what does it bind satan from doing?
Roaming around....
 
Roaming around....
No, that is not what that "chain" kept in check for a thousand years. These Rev. 20:1-3 verses say that this chain and the seal put upon Satan were to keep Satan from deceiving the nations during that time. They say absolutely nothing about physically restraining Satan from moving from one location to another. Actually, they don't even say that Satan would quit his attempts to deceive during that time - only that he would have no success at deceiving the nations for that time period. And this text doesn't say that mankind had no ability to deceive themselves during that time, either. The conditions of the millennium have been exaggerated far beyond the limits of the scripture's description of this time period.
 
No, that is not what that "chain" kept in check for a thousand years. These Rev. 20:1-3 verses say that this chain and the seal put upon Satan were to keep Satan from deceiving the nations during that time. They say absolutely nothing about physically restraining Satan from moving from one location to another. Actually, they don't even say that Satan would quit his attempts to deceive during that time - only that he would have no success at deceiving the nations for that time period. And this text doesn't say that mankind had no ability to deceive themselves during that time, either. The conditions of the millennium have been exaggerated far beyond the limits of the scripture's description of this time period.
Even though Satan is chained up at this time..despite that...people will continue to display their sin nature.
 
Sir, very briefly, since I do not want to leave the context of Revelation 20, and get sidetrack, which is very easy to do.

Well did he see, or did he not see, you cannot have it both ways?

He certainly did not see a theophany~The word theophany is a combination of two Greek words, meaning God and appearance.

John said the saw an angel, and this angel was not Jesus Christ as many suppose~I believe it was Michael the archangel, who does have the power and strength to stop Satan. No where in the scriptures does it say he does not~he is that great prince that stands for the people of God.

Michael is not Jesus Christ as the Jehovah "false" Witnesses' believe and others with them. Another study for another day, not now.


Revelation chapter 20 is no parable ~but, truths that will happen just as John said it would, which truths are hidden in this vision, by using highly symbolically language, that can be understood, by using plain verses in the NT, as we shall soon see, the Lord willing.

Who other than Jesus the Son of man could represent . Who is like eternal God? . Michael the main apostle Jesus.

Satan the king of lying signs to wonder after it would seem having a field day with his legion of false prophet, false apostles

We pray one manner our Holy unseen father not a legion of messengers patron saints some call angel(fake word)

I would think we would not to leave the out of Gods word it was sent and signified .

Signify use as a sign the temporal historical thing seen to give the unseen eternal understanding (faith) verse 1

Can't have a understanding of faith and literalize at the same time . Remember without parables Christ the Holy Spirit spoke not hiding the understand of those who literalize .

Look to the historical and the unseen eternal . They must be mixed.

The word angel a fake word it sounds like the Greek "Angelos" sent messenger (UPS, FED X ,Pony Express, Uber as in how beautiful are the feet of the Apostles shod with the gospel but.

John, the messenger apostles heard message not saw the message of Christ, yoked with him our Immanuel we can enter his rest

I think its silly to believe in things not seen other than Christ. How could a person entertain a angel not seen.

It should read Be not forgetful to entertain visible strangers: for thereby some have entertained apostles, messenger of Christ unawares. They might have a verse for you or you for them . Christian fellowship

Hebrews 13:2Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.

Obviously passed on from the Pharisees with Sadducees to the Roman Catholics with Eastern Orthodox sect it is a must for them to give the illusion of a legion of fathers as workers with a familiar spirit gods.They the must cal patron saints

Christ in us working with us not a legion of patron saints
 
Back
Top