The Three "Lost Verses" of Acts

[EarlyActs]

For Dispensational eschatology to survive, there needs to be 3 'lost verses' discovered in an original text of Acts.

1, a verse at Acts 2:31B that declares that the resurrection is not the Davidic enthronement of "the future," even though Peter says it is. The verse would tell everyone to realize that X000 years in the future there would be a Davidic kingdom on earth because there is not going to be a confusion of Jews with Christians; that Jews will have the world for 1000 years under a 'Messiah' who may not be Christ (not sure).

2, a verse at Acts 13:39B that says that the Isaiah quote just made does not mean the land of Israel, and that X000 years in the future there will be a Judaistic millenium with the temple and all that.

3, a verse at Acts 26:7B that says to ignore what he just said about the hope of Israel being fulfilled in the resurrection and that X000 years in the future there will be a kingdom in the land and that the worships system, which they now keep going day and night, will be central. So there is no conflict!

 

[Mr GLee]

For Dispensational eschatology to survive, there needs to be 3 'lost verses' discovered in an original text of Acts.

1, a verse at Acts 2:31B that declares that the resurrection is not the Davidic enthronement of "the future," even though Peter says it is. The verse would tell everyone to realize that X000 years in the future there would be a Davidic kingdom on earth because there is not going to be a confusion of Jews with Christians; that Jews will have the world for 1000 years under a 'Messiah' who may not be Christ (not sure).

2, a verse at Acts 13:39B that says that the Isaiah quote just made does not mean the land of Israel, and that X000 years in the future there will be a Judaistic millenium with the temple and all that.

3, a verse at Acts 26:7B that says to ignore what he just said about the hope of Israel being fulfilled in the resurrection and that X000 years in the future there will be a kingdom in the land and that the worships system, which they now keep going day and night, will be central. So there is no conflict!

It would seem many forget not all of Israel are born again Israel. The same with the word Jew no al that say hey are born agin Jews are In the

Same way with the new name the father named His bride. Christian, literally meaning (residents of the city of Christ) named after her husband Christ. Not all that say they are Christians are born again. Some remained under Jacob the deceiver, non converted mankind .

It would seem two resurrections working altogether as one,

 

[CrowCross]

1, a verse at Acts 2:31B that declares that the resurrection is not the Davidic enthronement of "the future," even though Peter says it is.

This would mean we can't trust anything Peter says. Are you willing to accept that?

 

[Mr GLee]

This would mean we can't trust anything Peter says. Are you willing to accept that?

It would depend on what he says? Who inspires him .

Mathew 16: 22-23 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

When Peter rebuked the invisible head Christ and forbid the Son of man Jesus from doing the will of the father . We resist that kind of false prophecy.

 

[CrowCross]

It would depend on what he says? Who inspires him .

Is not ALL scripture inspired by the Hols Spirit? Even what Peter wrote?