The Sabbath in End times

[EarlyActs]

Because if the 10 were done away with at the Cross, why do we see Christ's followers (the 1st Christians) obeying them that night in Lk. 23:54-56?

And if the 10 were done away with at Pent., why do we see Paul referred to by the Elders as a "keeper of the Law" in Acts 21:24?

He was well past his time in Judaism and was a Christian of Christians - what Law could he have been said to be keeping? The Elders would not have referred to the modern teaching of simply loving all people as a Law at that time.

You lost me.

??

Are you aware of the location and time shift between Matt. 24 verses 2 & 3?

That change of location between the Temple and Mt of Olives, which would've taken about a half hour on foot, proves that everything Jesus spoke of beginning with verse 3 could not have been referring to the Temple.

Your last point is nonsense. Just compare language of Mt ch 10 and 24 to know they are both about that generation.

 

[EarlyActs]

Because if the 10 were done away with at the Cross, why do we see Christ's followers (the 1st Christians) obeying them that night in Lk. 23:54-56?

And if the 10 were done away with at Pent., why do we see Paul referred to by the Elders as a "keeper of the Law" in Acts 21:24?

He was well past his time in Judaism and was a Christian of Christians - what Law could he have been said to be keeping? The Elders would not have referred to the modern teaching of simply loving all people as a Law at that time.

You lost me.

??

Are you aware of the location and time shift between Matt. 24 verses 2 & 3?

That change of location between the Temple and Mt of Olives, which would've taken about a half hour on foot, proves that everything Jesus spoke of beginning with verse 3 could not have been referring to the Temple.

Ceremonial and dietary law is not the same as core ethical law.

 

[EarlyActs]

Because if the 10 were done away with at the Cross, why do we see Christ's followers (the 1st Christians) obeying them that night in Lk. 23:54-56?

And if the 10 were done away with at Pent., why do we see Paul referred to by the Elders as a "keeper of the Law" in Acts 21:24?

He was well past his time in Judaism and was a Christian of Christians - what Law could he have been said to be keeping? The Elders would not have referred to the modern teaching of simply loving all people as a Law at that time.

You lost me.

??

Are you aware of the location and time shift between Matt. 24 verses 2 & 3?

That change of location between the Temple and Mt of Olives, which would've taken about a half hour on foot, proves that everything Jesus spoke of beginning with verse 3 could not have been referring to the Temple.

Those raised in Judaism gradually dropped ceremonial and dietary. The timing of the Cross and Pent is not the matter. The fact of the Cross does.

 

[EarlyActs]

Because if the 10 were done away with at the Cross, why do we see Christ's followers (the 1st Christians) obeying them that night in Lk. 23:54-56?

And if the 10 were done away with at Pent., why do we see Paul referred to by the Elders as a "keeper of the Law" in Acts 21:24?

He was well past his time in Judaism and was a Christian of Christians - what Law could he have been said to be keeping? The Elders would not have referred to the modern teaching of simply loving all people as a Law at that time.

You lost me.

??

Are you aware of the location and time shift between Matt. 24 verses 2 & 3?

That change of location between the Temple and Mt of Olives, which would've taken about a half hour on foot, proves that everything Jesus spoke of beginning with verse 3 could not have been referring to the Temple.

If you are lost about how the new sabbath in Christ compares to the line in Jn 4 about locations of worship, read Heb 4 10x and call me in the morning to see if my headache is gone.

 

[EarlyActs]

Because if the 10 were done away with at the Cross, why do we see Christ's followers (the 1st Christians) obeying them that night in Lk. 23:54-56?

And if the 10 were done away with at Pent., why do we see Paul referred to by the Elders as a "keeper of the Law" in Acts 21:24?

He was well past his time in Judaism and was a Christian of Christians - what Law could he have been said to be keeping? The Elders would not have referred to the modern teaching of simply loving all people as a Law at that time.

You lost me.

??

Are you aware of the location and time shift between Matt. 24 verses 2 & 3?

That change of location between the Temple and Mt of Olives, which would've taken about a half hour on foot, proves that everything Jesus spoke of beginning with verse 3 could not have been referring to the Temple.

Mt 24A was about 1st cent Judea and nearby. The end of the world was expected right after these things; 24B.

But the final judgement of the world has clearly been delayed, as was allowed. I know of 3 passages that support that and 2P3 is speaking about that delay.

 

[EarlyActs]

Because if the 10 were done away with at the Cross, why do we see Christ's followers (the 1st Christians) obeying them that night in Lk. 23:54-56?

And if the 10 were done away with at Pent., why do we see Paul referred to by the Elders as a "keeper of the Law" in Acts 21:24?

He was well past his time in Judaism and was a Christian of Christians - what Law could he have been said to be keeping? The Elders would not have referred to the modern teaching of simply loving all people as a Law at that time.

You lost me.

??

Are you aware of the location and time shift between Matt. 24 verses 2 & 3?

That change of location between the Temple and Mt of Olives, which would've taken about a half hour on foot, proves that everything Jesus spoke of beginning with verse 3 could not have been referring to the Temple.

There is no changing the biological lock of Luke 23:28+. It happened when they were adults. Please pester no more til you have read the description of my COVENANT REVOLT. Amazon.

 

[donadams]

You speak of


Yet you don't address the grammar and syntax. As a matter of fact for the sake of dogma you ignore it..

The grammar as showed above connects verse 20 and before to the point where Jesus speaks of the tribulation prior to the gathering of the elect from one end of heaven unto the other. So no it is not speaking to just Jews it speaks to all of Christendom down to the point when the Elect are gathered from one end of heaven unto the other.

Don’t you believe any of the 255 dogma’s?

 

[donadams]

Never a pagan worship day!

Sunday

Refuting the “Pagan Origins of the Lord’s Day” Myth Part 1: Did Pagans Celebrate a Weekly Festival on Sunday?
There are three primary groups of people that propagate the myth that the historical Christian tradition of corporate worship on Sunday is rooted in paganism and foisted upon Christendom by the Roman Catholic Church. They are: 1) Seventh Day Sabbatarians; 2) atheists; and 3) pagans.

The scholars unanimously agreed on the following:

Neither the Romans nor the Greeks ever had a regular weekly day of rest from secular work.
Neither did they have a regular weekly festival day.
They did not have a regular day of the week on which they gathered for pagan worship.
They did not have a regular day of the week on which they went to their temples to pray or make offerings.

Conclusion

As Canright amply demonstrated, the testimony of history itself is the proverbial “nail in the coffin” to the myth of the pagan commemoration of a weekly Sunday. Since Sunday had never been a weekly day of worship dedicated to Apollo (or Sol Invictus, etc.) in the first place no one can reasonably be accused of adopting it- much less “Christianizing” it.

In essence, the case for a “pagan Sunday,” no matter what subsequent evidence is provided, is an abject failure since the foundation on which it is built- the existence of a weekly Sunday pagan observance- is a demonstrably false assumption. In the following articles we will examine the equally historically untenable claims revolving around the controversial Constantine, the Roman Catholic Church, and various ecumenical councils.