• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE TORAH

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeremiah1five
  • Start date Start date
Said also to those who were Gentiles:

Titus 2:14
Who gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds.
THAT'S what you want to think.

Titus was a Hellenized Jew. He was helped to know their Messiah through Saul.
Here, Saul identifies him as being of the common faith which is the faith of the New Covenant Adonai made with the House of Israel

1 To Titus, mine own son after the common faith: Titus 1:4.

Another statement of his being a Jew:

13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; 14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works. Titus 2:13–14.

Although there are several references to "peculiarty" I think Saul is quotiong in part from their Hebrew Scriptures Deuteronomy, a passage as a Jew he would be familiar with. Gentiles would know nothing of the Hebrew Scriptures:

18 And the LORD hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people, as he hath promised thee, and that thou shouldest keep all his commandments; Dt 26:18.

So, suffice it to say Titus was a Jew who grew up in Gentile land as the majority of Hebrews remained in Assyria and Babylon and Gentile lands in-between when Cyrus gave permission to Nehemiah to return to their land and rebuild. Only one remnant returned to the Holy Land and that is about 10% of total. So, "a people for His own possession" are the Hebrews/Jews in covenant with God. Gentiles (non-Hebrew) are not "a people for His own possession."
 
The kingdom of God is not Israel.
The kingdom of God is Christ Himself. In our conversion the kingdom of God is within you and Christ is that kingdom, or Reign of God. Surely a place cannot be within a person.
It is everything. He is King of kings and Lord of lords. He has dominion over everything in heaven and on earth. If He wants to bring non-Jews into His kingdom who are you o man to argue with God. There is no pure Jewish line or Hebrew line and there never was.
Since the Jews were scattered the majority would most likely not be "pure" but there may be a small number who have pure lines. But that's not the issue. If one has Abraham's DNA in their veins no matter how miniscule, then they are Hebrew heritage and the seed of Abraham and in salvation covenant with Him. How far back can you trace your family line? If you are born-again there just might be some Hebrew DNA in you. The Samaritans' purpose was progenitor, even a shadow of another scattering by the Romans that would be more widespread that the one when conquered by the Assyrians and the Babylonians (and the Mede-Persians, and the Greeks, etc) The Jews just kept getting scattered everywhere. It is poetic justice. God commanded the children of Israel to not mingle with the nations (Gentiles) nor learn their ways but they didn't obey. They wanted to mingle so much that there you are. MINGLED!
Even the Seed bearer of every generation is peppered throughout with what you call Gentiles with disdain and scorn (bigotry).
You misunderstand me. I can approach Scripture without emotional baggage and accept what God says about everything, even His attitude of "all nations" (Gentiles) that are not His people and nothing to Him without being disgruntled or disdainful of God. Who am I to reply against God? Shall the thing formed say to Him that formed it, why have you made me thus? I accept He is God and He can do whatever He wants with His creation. I'm curious why you don't have the same consideration of God in this regard. I know I am saved. I know I am born-again, converted, justified, possess faith, called, chosen. and I know that in this redemption upon my life knowing God has made no covenant with non-Hebrews there just might be Abrahamic DNA in my family history. That's the only thing that can explain it. If you are true born you just might be my "brethren in the flesh" as Saul calls it.
Not even David the descendant of Jesus was Jewish or Hebrew but his grandmother Ruth was a Moabite--- a Gentile.
David was Hebrew. He was from the tribe of Judah. Scripture makes this clear. Joseph was Hebrew from the tribe of Judah. Was Mary? But two lines are given in Matthew and Luke. One is to show Messiah's family back to David as one authorized to sit on the throne. It was a patriarchal society. The men held all the cards and God ordained it. Ruth was a Moabitess. She was not from the seed of Abraham. According to Genesis, Moab was the son of Lot, who was the nephew of Abraham. The covenant is with Abraham and his seed and Moabites are not his seed. But she through marriage to Boaz did enjoy the blessings of Abraham to be called among other blessings the Great-Great-Great- etc., grandmother of the Savior. She's up there with Mary as blessed among women.
Did Jesus only die for the Jews? Is that how small God's world is?
Yes, as per the salvation covenants of redemption He died for them.
On no, they are innumerable as the sand on the sea and stars in the sky. You know the passage. It's not an exaggeration.

9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us [Jews] to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.
Rev. 5:8–10.

If through scattering Abraham's seed co-mingled with non-Hebrews (Gentiles) then this passage is easily understood. Just as God called Jacob and not Esau the same applies although Esau was of Abraham's seed. The Reformed position is also John 17:

6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: Jn 17:6.

Except the Gentile church use this to refer to Gentiles (obviously) but the twelve were Jewish men and they were only once scattered seven hundred years ago. The Roman scattering in AD 70 was far worse. Rome passed laws which prohibited Jews from returning to Israel. And while the Empire lasted (AD 410) I don't think those laws were ever rescinded.
It is stated all over scripture that all who believe, not only the Jew but also the Greek (Gentile) there is no difference, inherit the kingdom of heaven. Tell me where it says they DON'T.
Yes, but you take "Gentile" as Roman, Scythian, Greek, etc., any uncircumcised, non-covenant idol-worshiping person as Gentile but I the text makes clear the people that were closest to the testimony of Jewish Christians about their Messiah and the Holy Spirit of Promise took place among the Jews and in their synagogues and it was proselytes and God-Fearers who were first to have heard of Israel's Messiah and become saved/born-again. Gentiles hated the Jews. The Jews hated the Gentiles. There were no two groups of people more hostile towards each other than these two. Gentiles lived over there, and Jews lived even further over there. So, any Jewish Christian witnessing to an uncircumcised Gentile would not get any closer to communicate than east is to west. If it were legal - and one day, it will be - Gentiles would murder Jews where they stood.
In other words, if I show you, which I have, you will just say I misunderstand the text. I know God is in covenant with all believers,
God is not in covenant with all believers for all believers are not the seed of Abraham. You're Gentile. You're not the DNA seed of Abraham. So, how can you delude yourself to say the impossible? The world may not be ready to hear that so-called Gentiles that are born-again have Hebrew DNA in their family lines by virtue of the several scatterings of the Jews throughout the last 3000 years, and this is not an exact number, more ballpark. Jews could also have chosen to live elsewhere before the Assyrian conquest to the north, or the Babylonian exile to the south. But this is slowly being disseminated today. This knowledge is coming of age and although it cannot be directly proved, it cannot be directly disproved either. It's just one of those things. But it is reasonable, NOT unreasonable.
irregardless of anything but believing in the crucified and risen Christ, because I know what a covenant is in the Bible. Shall I tell you again? Will you listen this time? (Rhetorical)
If you say the same thing as God I will hear AND listen. But say for the sake of argument you don't?
A personal God who is completely other than what He creates, who is spirit and invisible, whereas what He creates is visible and matter.
Yes, it does have to be identified as covenant or every passage is open to being a covenant. There are rules guiding human contracts. There's even a field of law called "Contract Law." But we're dealing with a culture, time, and place so very far removed from western civilization it's not as though we can apply our contract laws to the Abrahamic Covenant (Contract.) The parting of the animals in Genesis 15 was a typical covenant instrument in the time of Abraham. Even the giving of the tithe to Melchizedek has its own interpretation. It was a title generally attributed to Shem.
His relationship with His covenant people is not the same as that of His governing position as God over all.
A people not His people are one and the same people. A people not His people: disobedient, divorced Israel. A people His people: an obedient and married/betrothed Israel.
This is the only people God is concerned with and has covenant promises with. Everyone else is under His rule, but even though everyone is under His rule, not everyone is His people.
God did not fail to fulfill any promise He gave to the nation of Israel.
There are still Promises to fulfill towards His people Israel and until that moment arrives - and it hasn't - not one jot or tittle shall pass from the Law till ALL is fulfilled.
Tell me, considering this truth is the Law of God/Moses passed (abolished/expired?)
Because one cannot have a New Covenant unless it stands on the shoulders of the Mosaic Covenant for the life and existence of the Holy Spirit rests on your answer.
Isaiah, Daniel, Ezekiel, Jesus, Revelation all have made prophecies that have a future day fulfillment.
 
The kingdom of God is Christ Himself. In our conversion the kingdom of God is within you and Christ is that kingdom, or Reign of God. Surely a place cannot be within a person.
Therefore, not Israel.As you imply.
The Promised Land is Israel's. The kingdom of heaven is meant for Jews

If one has Abraham's DNA in their veins no matter how miniscule, then they are Hebrew heritage and the seed of Abraham and in salvation covenant with Him.
Everyone has Abraham's DNA. We all come from Adam.
The Samaritans' purpose was progenitor, even a shadow of another scattering by the Romans that would be more widespread that the one when conquered by the Assyrians and the Babylonians (and the Mede-Persians, and the Greeks, etc) The Jews just kept getting scattered everywhere. It is poetic justice. God commanded the children of Israel to not mingle with the nations (Gentiles) nor learn their ways but they didn't obey. They wanted to mingle so much that there you are. MINGLED!
You are meandering again. Do you think any of that surprised God or that it did not serve His purpose?
David was Hebrew. He was from the tribe of Judah. Scripture makes this clear.
Now you are setting up a different goal post for yourself than the one you set for me. The subject is pure Hebrew lines.
9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us [Jews] to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.
Rev. 5:8–10.
All the redeemed in Christ. Adding the parenthetical "Jews" is adding to the Bible for it does not say that. In fact what it says is"every kingdom, and tongue and people, and nation"
If through scattering Abraham's seed co-mingled with non-Hebrews (Gentiles) then this passage is easily understood. Just as God called Jacob and not Esau the same applies although Esau was of Abraham's seed.
It is easily understood without connecting it to Abraham or the Jews at all. There is no need to go through a song and dance to try and make it fit your slander of Jesus and the power and glory of His work----for all of the people God gives Him. Why do you ignore the verses that say God shows no partiality as to Jew or Gentile? Those that say in the house of God there is no Jew or Gentile but we are all one? That say Jesus tore down that dividing wall?
Except the Gentile church use this to refer to Gentiles
There is no Gentile church, and non-Jewish Christians to not separate Christ's church into factions and ethnic groups. They take John 17 to mean exactly what it says. All those that are in Christ through faith. What you put forth is unbiblical and it calls evil good and good evil. There is no such thing known as the Gentile Church. Which makes all your posts about the Gentile church nothing but a vapor and a rant.
God is not in covenant with all believers for all believers are not the seed of Abraham. You're Gentile. You're not the DNA seed of Abraham. So, how can you delude yourself to say the impossible?
TO EVERY READER. TAKE HEED!!

The above is an evil heresy, born of racism, bigotry, prejudice. Don't fall for it. It reduces God to only caring about one tiny spot, and a thimble full of people, in all of His glorious creation. And Jesus only dying for them.
 
If you say the same thing as God I will hear AND listen. But say for the sake of argument you don't?
Well---you start out assuming that whatever you say IS the same as God, so naturally you are going to consider anything say that you disagree with is not. As though you were infallible. But say for the sake of truthfulness, you don't and you aren't. All your posts appeal to your own authority (Aa logical fallacy) but neither you nor anyone else has even established that authority. So it is double fallacy.
 
There is no longer an office of Prophet. God now speaks to us through Jesus Christ. (Heb 1)
That's pretty vague. Of course there's prophets, and apostles, and evangelists, and pastors and teachers. And there's twelve disciples to correspond to twelve tribes. There are tongues, word of wisdom, word of knowledge, giving, and a host of other gifts to the Church including pounds and talents.
God does not reveal His mind. He reveals His word. "The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law."
His Word is His Mind. It's the Mind of Christ.
What if you are wrong when you say that is what Gentile Christians believe? And you are wrong.
Oh no. I know because I USED TO believe those things but I came out from among them and become separate. The Lord has led me in His word and I know what I am saying is true because it's my call and gifts to know. I am not wrong. I'm only in the minority.
For now.
The entire premise for you anti-Gentile rant (just as evil as anti Semitism or any other bigotry against people)is wrong, and from that you have created an imaginary and anti-christ to be honest, set of beliefs. You need to go back to the beginning and set aside all the prejudice and bigotry that are blinding the eyes. It is a straw man.
You misjudge me. I don't rant.
If I say "the nations are nothing before the Lord. They are waste. Non-entities." You'll say I am wrong, report me or I'll have a Mod on me like flies of dung.
But if the Lord says it, then what? You'll reject the Word of the Lord and still report me. You'll look for an angle or some outlandish interpretation, so you won't have to accept it. That's what ALWAYS happens at forums. There's no honesty, no integrity, no sincerity towards God's Word.

17 All nations before him are as nothing;
And they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity.
Isaiah 40:17.

Or you'll persecute both of us.

What you do to these the least of my brethren you have done it unto me, Jesus said.

But those words mean nothing to professed "Christians."
 
"My people" is covenant language. Romans 9:22-26
"My people" is covenant language only after spoken of to a people ALREADY in covenant with God. He never says that of Gentiles. Nor does He say that to people to which He is in the process of making covenant. It was after the covenant was completed that such designation is made of those in covenant with Him. Otherwise, you'll have a new covenant every time He says, "My people." And He says it countless times. Are you of the position that each time He says "My people" it's a new covenant being made?
22What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory— 24even us whom he has called, not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles? 25As indeed he says in Hosea,
If the context does not identify what I call hard-core, uncircumcised, non-covenant, idol-worshiping Roman, Scythian, Greek Gentiles, then it means circumcised Gentile proselytes and uncircumcised God-Fearers. Like the Gentiles by which the Jerusalem Council was held. It was to address hard-core, uncircumcised, non-covenant, idol-worshiping Roman, Scythian, Greek converts to the Judaic religion.
“Those who were not my people I will call ‘my people,’
and her who was not beloved I will call ‘beloved.’”
26“And in the very place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’
there they will be called ‘sons of the living God.’”


Hosea 2:18 In that day I will make a covenant for them---23 Then I will sow her for MYself, in the earth, and I will have mercy on her who had not obtained mercy; then I will say to those who were not My people,'You are My people!" And they shall say, 'You are my God!"

Paul interpreted those passages as applying to Jew and Gentile alike.
No, those words are to Israel. It's your re-interpretation that wants to include Gentiles, but God has never called Gentile "My people." The tribe of Benjamin is My people. The tribe of Judah is My people. Only Hebrews are My people and what belongs to Christ was given Him by the Father before creation and that people are Abraham and His seed.
And the term "Jew" actually comes from Judah not Hebrew/children of Jacob.
Yes, but it's used to refer to the Hebrews in general. I do both. Hebrews and Jews.
All nations would include Israel.
Only in the context of the definition in Genesis 15 and 17 for "masses."
Gentiles (non-Hebrew) did not come into existence until the Abrahamic Covenant. After that it was used mainly for non-Hebrews.
When God says the nations are as nothing to Him (even though He made them and for His glory seen in all the earth, and to serve His purpose) it refers to His sovereignty and power over everything He created. It is time to cease reducing God to Israel in a ethnic, geopolitical. He is over all the Earth and is restoring all the Earth!
Yes, I knew you'd try to work a way around it.
If the nations were something, then God would not give them to Israel as an inheritance.

8 Ask of me,
And I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance,
And the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron;
Thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
Psalm 2:8–9.

Or God would not exalt "My people" Israel above the Gentiles/heathens/uncircumcised, non-Hebrew idol-worshipers.

8 God brought him forth out of Egypt;
He hath as it were the strength of an unicorn:
He shall eat up the nations his enemies,
And shall break their bones,
And pierce them through with his arrows.
Num. 24:8.

2 For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth.
Dt 14:1–2.

19 And to make thee high above all nations which he hath made, in praise, and in name, and in honour; and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the LORD thy God, as he hath spoken.
Dt 26:19.

Behold, the day of the LORD cometh,
And thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.
2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle;
And the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and ethe women ravished;
And half of the city shall go forth into captivity,
And the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.
3 Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations,
As when he fought in the day of battle.
4 And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives,
Which is before Jerusalem on the east,
And the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west,
And there shall be a very great valley;
Zech. 14:1–4.

If Gentiles are "My people" why is He prophesied to destroy them utterly? Is that love?

7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.
Rev. 20:7–9.

If Gentiles are "My people" why does God allow them to be deceived and also send fire upon them and consume them?
If you are of Reformed persuasion, you can't go there, you can't answer that for it does damage to 'eternal security."
No, "My people" are not Gentiles. "My people" are Hebrews.
Peter was writing to believing Jews, Christian Jews, not all Jews, not unbelieving Jews. And notice what he says in 9-10 But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God's people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.
Brother Pete is quoting from the First Covenant and those words were addressed to Israel:

2 For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth.
Dt 14:1–2.

13 And he shall have it, and his seed after him, even the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel.
Num. 25:13.

Notice to whom atonement is made: the children of Israel.
After making offerings and sacrifice for the people God (Israel) the high priest did not leave city limits and go to the Gentile nations and make offerings and sacrifices for the Gentiles.
And if the Gentile has no covenant of grace through faith, neither does the Jew. Christ is not divided.
Christ is not divided. He has only one covenant and that is with Abram the Hebrew and his seed.
God made no covenant with Gentiles. None.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Here are the logical fallacies that remark encroaches on all rolled into one sentence.
ad hominem
appeal to authority (your own)
appeal to emotion
appeal to ridicule
circular reasoning
continuum fallacy
false attribution

You managed to work a bit of this one and a bit of that one (fallacies) into your conclusion----which in effect makes the entire post a bit of a fallacy.
If you can't attack the argument, attack the person.
A typical ploy of the lost.
When the day draws near for Israel's Messiah's return the truth of God's covenant being with Israel and Israel alone will sink in and they will attack Israel from all sides and even take half the city (Jerusalem) until the Lord comes and fights against those nations and the last time I checked Gentile Christians live in those Gentile nations and they will be consumed with the breath of His mouth.

11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
Rev. 19:11–16.

He rules the nations (Gentiles) with a rod of iron, but leads and guides His sheep Israel with a Shepherds staff.
 
"My people" is covenant language only after spoken of to a people ALREADY in covenant with God. He never says that of Gentiles. Nor does He say that to people to which He is in the process of making covenant. It was after the covenant was completed that such designation is made of those in covenant with Him. Otherwise, you'll have a new covenant every time He says, "My people." And He says it countless times. Are you of the position that each time He says "My people" it's a new covenant being made?
None of that is true, it is made up so as to avoid the obvious. Use the whole Bible to arrive at what you presume to be a teacher of.

Hosea: "Those who are not my people I will call my people." That is God speaking and He was speaking it in prophecy through the Prophet, Hosea.
If the context does not identify what I call hard-core, uncircumcised, non-covenant, idol-worshiping Roman, Scythian, Greek Gentiles, then it means circumcised Gentile proselytes and uncircumcised God-Fearers. Like the Gentiles by which the Jerusalem Council was held. It was to address hard-core, uncircumcised, non-covenant, idol-worshiping Roman, Scythian, Greek converts to the Judaic religion.
Correct interpretation of the Scriptures is not achieved by doing so through the confirmation bias of "what I call hard-core etc" (your words). All that means is that what Paul said is so clear, and so undoes your prejudice against non-Jews, and your fury that God would ever enter into covenant with them, that you will go to any lengths to pull the wool over the eyes of those He loves and died for.
No, those words are to Israel. It's your re-interpretation that wants to include Gentiles, but God has never called Gentile "My people." The tribe of Benjamin is My people. The tribe of Judah is My people. Only Hebrews are My people and what belongs to Christ was given Him by the Father before creation and that people are Abraham and His seed.
It is not my interpretation. It is Paul's. He got over his prejudice and desire to kill all those Gentiles who claimed God was their covenant God too. He listened to the the Savior when he was confronted by Him. He listened to the teaching of the Holy Spirit---as did Peter. When will you?
Only in the context of the definition in Genesis 15 and 17 for "masses."
Gentiles (non-Hebrew) did not come into existence until the Abrahamic Covenant. After that it was used mainly for non-Hebrews.
How long do you sit and ponder the truth when it is presented, in order to figure out a way to deny it? If all else fails--deflect---right? When God says all nations are as nothing to Him, He means all nations. And He means if He so much as whispers "Be gone!" they are gone.
 
The kingdom of God is Christ Himself. In our conversion the kingdom of God is within you and Christ is that kingdom, or Reign of God. Surely a place cannot be within a person.

Hi would offer.

No place to include the heart and soul of mankind ?

We are the living temple. God never did live in dead temples made with human hands as a dying will .

Remember the Father who authored of scripture renamed his eternal bride in Acts she promised of in in Isaiah 62

(PURPLE) my commentary or opinion,

Isaiah 62:1-5King James Version For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth.And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of the Lord, and a royal diadem in the hand of thy God.Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate: but thou shalt be called Hephzibah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married. For as a young man (Christ) marrieth a virgin (Bride or church) , so shall thy sons (bride) marry thee:( Christ the husband ) and as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall thy God rejoice over thee.

The new name, a more befitting name to name the bride of all the nations of the world. "Christian" literally meaning as denomyn with nothing added or subtracted. "Residents of the married city of Christ spoken of in Isaiah 62, the heavenly Jerusalem , prepared for His bride the one church named after the founder and husband Christ.

Paul who labored preaching the gospel suffered the birth pains until Christ the husband was formed in Timothy a member of the bride again spoken of in Isaiah 62

2 Corinthians 11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.

Timothy the chaste virgin Just like Abel .

Our new bodies, neither male nor female, Jew nor gentile

A New creation not rebuilt or refurbished (no procreating)
 
Last edited:
Therefore, not Israel.As you imply.
Do you say that because you believe what I said or because you think it will win you a debate point?
The kingdom of God is Christ Himself. "Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. Lk 17:21.
Christ said, "But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you." Mt 12:27–28.
Everyone has Abraham's DNA. We all come from Adam.
Mixed up.
So, we're ALL Hebrew?
We do not all come from Adam. We may do so technically, but we come from Noah and split off at his three sons and their three wives. Shem was called of God. Noah was a preacher of righteousness and Shem, his son, was alive and the king of righteousness (Melchizedek) when Abraham gave tithes.
According to Genesis 11:10 and after the flood, his line went: Arphaxad ---> Salah ---> Eber ---> Peleg ---> Reu ---> Serug ---> Nahor ---> Terah ---> Terah had at least three sons (among others) named Abraham, Nahor, and Haran.

Hebrew records Salah "crossed over" the Jordan to separate his family from the rest of the Adamites who disobeyed God to 'scatter' and stayed together to eventually build a city under Nimrod the mighty hunter. Nimrod didn't hunt animals. He hunted people. And he was bright enough to build a city and walls to encircle it because as a hunter of people he didn't want his enemies raiding his property and taking him out. He was the first to build walls to protect him.
To commemorate the "crossing over" the Jordan in obedience to God to separated and "fill the earth" he named his son "Eber" which means "crossed/ing over." This was an obedient, godly line. You could call them "sons of God" from the line of Seth. Eber's name is also very similar to the word for "Hebrew." Genesis 14:13 identifies Abram as Hebrew or from the family line of Eber and as obedient as he and his family was God blessed him. He was an "Exalted father" until covenant and the resulting blessings God changed his name to Abraham which I'm sure you know means "father of man." '
Japheth and Ham were not obedient. Ham was the father of Canaan and it was not Ham who saw his father's nakedness that God cursed, but his son. Talk about a person paying for his own sin. God cursed Ham's son for the sin of Ham.
Japheth had his own ungodly family line. But I won't get into it here.
You are meandering again. Do you think any of that surprised God or that it did not serve His purpose?
In fact what it says is"every kingdom, and tongue and people, and nation"
It says, "OUT OF."

8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.
9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.
Rev. 5:7–10.

Gentiles hated the Jews and the Jews hated the unclean Gentiles. As more Gentiles were being "brought in" and with their hatred of Jewry intact and the knowledge of their Temple destroyed, it was an easy transition to think and believe God judged Israel and Israel was done for, while more Gentiles were being saved. In time Israel was almost non-existent and Gentiles began in their hatred of Jews and what God did to their Temple (self-serving) began to unmoor true, Biblical Christianity from its Hebrew roots and teach a form of Replacement Theology that Gentiles replaced Israel. When they did that the Gentile church became its own religion for being unmoored from Biblical Christianity, the Christianity of Hebrew covenants and prophecy and promises, Gentiles without Hebrew Scriptures and a Hebrew to help them interpret them considering Hebrew history and culture and made their own choices and determinations that come from a Gentile mindset and Gentile history and culture.

In the First Covenant writings the "saints" are Israel. Look it up, it's true.
God promised Israel was to become a people of kings and priests.
And the statement of "OUT OF" makes sense given the Hebrews were a scattered people and their DNA is by now in many a person alive today.
It is easily understood without connecting it to Abraham or the Jews at all.
The problem is you take "Gentile" to mean the enemy of the Jews. I take it as those already allied and obedient to the Torah of God. This means allied circumcised Gentile proselytes and uncircumcised Gentile God-Fearers such as Cornelius or the Roman centurion who knew the Torah and even built a synagogue for the Jews. Your typical uncircumcised Gentile was an enemy of the Jews. And they were NOT obedient to God's Torah.

14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. Rev. 22:14.

The implication is those that do not obey God's Torah are not blessed and WILL NOT have a right to the tree of life but may end up being identified as this people:

15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. Rev. 22:14–15.

And one of those lies is that Gentiles have replaced Israel and that everything Hebrew and Jewish in the bible is now Gentile, including being part of the Hebrew Covenants, re-interpreting the Hebrew Scriptures so that every Hebrew prophet and their prophecies has Gentiles as their target audience. But all this is a lie.

Those that despise God's Torah are cursed. Believing the Torah is "abolished" only reveals a person's cursedness and identifies them as not having a right to the tree of life as the verse in Revelation above states. Gentile proselytes and God-Fearers obeyed the Torah. These will get into the kingdom of heaven while those that say God's Torah is "abolished" may not.
There is no Gentile church, and non-Jewish Christians to not separate Christ's church into factions and ethnic groups.
Then as originally built there is only ONE Church, a Jewish Church. Christ began to build His Church - and get this because it is ignored - Christ began building His Church which is a spiritual Church aligned to the natural Church of "called out [ones]" identified in the Old Testament as the "Great Congregation" in the desert at the time of the Tabernacle. Church is "ekklesia" and it means "called out" (Greek: "kaleo") and Israel was CALLED OUT of Egypt.
And in the beginning and as per covenant promises to Israel those born again on Pentecost OBEYED the Torah after conversion as it was only natural that being a Hebrew Covenant and a Hebrew Messiah and Christ/Messiah OBEYED the Torah and born-again Jews OBEYED the Torah, Peter, James, Saul, ALL obeyed the Torah - even the conclusion of the Jerusalem Council which was a gathering of Jewish Christians instructed uncircumcised born-again Gentiles to obey portions of the Torah I must ask, if the Jewish Church is the fulfillment of Israel's Messiah's covenant with the Jewish people and He obeyed the Torah and there are promises of blessings and the tree of life to those that obey the Torah, why don't Gentiles obey the Torah in obedience to Christ and as Christ-followers? Then FOLLOW Christ and obey the Torah to ensure your blessings.
TO EVERY READER. TAKE HEED!!

The above is an evil heresy, born of racism, bigotry, prejudice. Don't fall for it. It reduces God to only caring about one tiny spot, and a thimble full of people, in all of His glorious creation. And Jesus only dying for them.
I've not said ANYTHING unbiblical.
On the contrary, I've said the same thing as God and I will continue to say the same thing as God and His Word:

33 And he shall make an atonement for the holy sanctuary, and he shall make an atonement for the tabernacle of the congregation, and for the altar, and he shall make an atonement for the priests, and for all the people of the congregation. Lev. 16:32–33.

Israel.

34 And this shall be an everlasting statute unto you, to make an atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year. And he did as the LORD commanded Moses. Lev. 16:34.

Israel.

Messiah was prophesied to Israel for the purpose of dying for the sins of His people hence the Name Jesus for He shall save HIS PEOPLE from their sins.

Jesus is the fulfillment of God's covenant promises TO ISRAEL.

This was the purpose of the Torah, to shadow the atonement of the cross. This was the purpose of the Torah to give God's people laws to live by. Christ has NEVER commanded His people to NOT obey the Torah.
In Revelation those that obey the Torah are blessed and have a RIGHT to the tree of life.

Now, have I said anything unbiblical?

Obey God's commands/Torah/Law or don't obey.
There is no medium.
 
Do you say that because you believe what I said or because you think it will win you a debate point?
The kingdom of God is Christ Himself. "Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. Lk 17:21.
Christ said, "But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you." Mt 12:27–28.
Yes the kingdom of Christ worked in the Son of man, Jesus . . to both reveal his eternal will to the Son and empower him to do it to the good pleasure of the powerful one the Holy Father

Jesus did will of the powerful one with delight.some like Jonah kicked against the pricks and wanted to die.

God is not served by the dying hands of mankind

Either Christ the anointing Holy Spirit of God who is not served by the dying hands of mankind Unless. Christ does all the work of salvation yoked with the belive or he does nothing

Philippians 2:13-14 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.
Do all things without murmurings and disputings:

The same food of the will of the Father that the disciples knew not of Our daily bread "thy will be done". Called hidden manna in Revelation 2:17

John 4:33-35King James Version33 Therefore said the disciples one to another, Hath any man brought him ought to eat? Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work.

Kingdom in the temple of God "the believers" Emanuel working in the believers the living temple. In us.. Not the opposite coming from us . Satan trying to turn inspiration upside down
 
The problem is you take "Gentile" to mean the enemy of the Jews.
No I don't. Who are you to say that I do? I take Gentile to refer to all peoples not of Israel the nation.
 
It says, "OUT OF."
Not all translations do. The KJV does and I suggest you check with other translations that do not change what the KJV says but words it more accurately to what is meant, as the KJV uses language that can be misconstrued, as language has changed over the centuries. And those changes are not biased as some like to claim, but reflect the teaching within the whole counsel of God on the subject at hand. Go back to all the places in which the phrase "the called," the "hardened," the "blinded" are used regarding Israel. The book of Romans is filled with them. The kingdom of God is made up of believers, not ethnicity. In any case that scripture in Rev says the saints, not the Jews. You are reading confirmation bias into it. As to verse 10, in all other translations besides the KJV and the NKJV it is not a nations of kings, but a kingdom of priests to serve our God. Why? Because the kingdom of God does not have kings, it has a King. Peter tells us this when he says believers are a kingdom of priests---it is to believers he is writing---the fact that they were Jewish believers is not Peter's point or focus.

Only the called of Israel are saved and only the called of Gentiles are saved.
14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. Rev. 22:14.

The implication is those that do not obey God's Torah are not blessed and WILL NOT have a right to the tree of life but may end up being identified as this people:
That is only the implication if one believes that salvation is of works and faith and not faith alone. The commandments in that passage is not referring to the written code, but to the law of God that is commanded of every living person, redeemed or not redeemed, to bear the image of God with which he was created. To obey Him. Sometimes law in the Bible refers to this, and sometimes to the Mosaic written code. Romans 7:6 But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released fro the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.
And one of those lies is that Gentiles have replaced Israel and that everything Hebrew and Jewish in the bible is now Gentile, including being part of the Hebrew Covenants, re-interpreting the Hebrew Scriptures so that every Hebrew prophet and their prophecies has Gentiles as their target audience. But all this is a lie.
The lie is in what you say here, for the Bible and Christianity do not teach that Gentiles have replaced Israel. The fact that some may believe that is irrelevant. The fact that at one time that was the understanding---or possibly the misunderstanding of what was being said on the matter---i.e the use of "church" in some of the writings of Reformers in reference to Israel, is irrelevant. "Church" was often used according to its definition. Ekklesia an assembly/gathering of people who came together to worship and serve God. Which is what Israel was and what believers are. It is clear from the Bible that the nation Israel was adopted by God as belonging to Him, and it is clear from the Bible that believers in Christ are said to be adopted as His children. (Romans 9:4-5; Eph 1:5; John 1:12;Gal 3:26;Romans 8:15). So all believers are adopted into Israel, not as a nation or according to ethnicity, but as the people of God. What you state is the lie because Christianity does not teach that every Hebrew prophet and their prophecies have non-Jews as their target. It recognizes the Messianic prophecies, and sees them as interpreted to apply to the New Covenant, in which God redeems a people for Himself from all nations. The New Covenant is not a covenant with Jew and/or Gentile. It is a covenant with believers!
Then as originally built there is only ONE Church, a Jewish Church. Christ began to build His Church - and get this because it is ignored - Christ began building His Church which is a spiritual Church aligned to the natural Church of "called out [ones]" identified in the Old Testament as the "Great Congregation" in the desert at the time of the Tabernacle. Church is "ekklesia" and it means "called out" (Greek: "kaleo") and Israel was CALLED OUT of Egypt.
Yes they were called out of Egypt. All believers are called out of bondage to sin, snatched out of the kingdom of darkness and brought into the kingdom of the Son who He loves. One is temporary and shadows what is to come and is of the earth. The other is eternal and is of heaven.
And in the beginning and as per covenant promises to Israel those born again on Pentecost OBEYED the Torah after conversion as it was only natural that being a Hebrew Covenant and a Hebrew Messiah and Christ/Messiah OBEYED the Torah and born-again Jews OBEYED the Torah, Peter, James, Saul, ALL obeyed the Torah - even the conclusion of the Jerusalem Council which was a gathering of Jewish Christians instructed uncircumcised born-again Gentiles to obey portions of the Torah I must ask, if the Jewish Church is the fulfillment of Israel's Messiah's covenant with the Jewish people and He obeyed the Torah and there are promises of blessings and the tree of life to those that obey the Torah, why don't Gentiles obey the Torah in obedience to Christ and as Christ-followers? Then FOLLOW Christ and obey the Torah to ensure your blessings.
At least be consistent with yourself and do what you demand that others do. Find a Jewish High Priest from the tribe of Levi and begin sacrificing your lambs. Obey to the letter all the Sabbath laws, and not just the seventh day Sabbath, exactly as they are prescribed in Deut. and Levit. But let me ask you. Why are you laying again upon the shoulders the burden that was too heavy for even Israel to bear? Wasn't that settled at the Jerusalem council?
Now, have I said anything unbiblical?

Obey God's commands/Torah/Law or don't obey.
There is no medium.
Your interpretation is unbiblical. But while we are here----are you obeying all of the Torah or are you just implying that you do?
 
No I don't. Who are you to say that I do? I take Gentile to refer to all peoples not of Israel the nation.
And you said you believe as a Gentile that because you are of Christ that you are in the Abrahamic Covenant when the Scripture states that the covenant is with Abram the HEBREW and his seed.
Do you also believe Gentiles have replaced Israel?
 
Not all translations do. The KJV does and I suggest you check with other translations that do not change what the KJV says but words it more accurately to what is meant, as the KJV uses language that can be misconstrued, as language has changed over the centuries. And those changes are not biased as some like to claim, but reflect the teaching within the whole counsel of God on the subject at hand. Go back to all the places in which the phrase "the called," the "hardened," the "blinded" are used regarding Israel. The book of Romans is filled with them. The kingdom of God is made up of believers, not ethnicity. In any case that scripture in Rev says the saints, not the Jews. You are reading confirmation bias into it. As to verse 10, in all other translations besides the KJV and the NKJV it is not a nations of kings, but a kingdom of priests to serve our God. Why? Because the kingdom of God does not have kings, it has a King. Peter tells us this when he says believers are a kingdom of priests---it is to believers he is writing---the fact that they were Jewish believers is not Peter's point or focus.

Only the called of Israel are saved and only the called of Gentiles are saved.

That is only the implication if one believes that salvation is of works and faith and not faith alone. The commandments in that passage is not referring to the written code, but to the law of God that is commanded of every living person, redeemed or not redeemed, to bear the image of God with which he was created. To obey Him. Sometimes law in the Bible refers to this, and sometimes to the Mosaic written code. Romans 7:6 But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released fro the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.

The lie is in what you say here, for the Bible and Christianity do not teach that Gentiles have replaced Israel. The fact that some may believe that is irrelevant. The fact that at one time that was the understanding---or possibly the misunderstanding of what was being said on the matter---i.e the use of "church" in some of the writings of Reformers in reference to Israel, is irrelevant. "Church" was often used according to its definition. Ekklesia an assembly/gathering of people who came together to worship and serve God. Which is what Israel was and what believers are. It is clear from the Bible that the nation Israel was adopted by God as belonging to Him, and it is clear from the Bible that believers in Christ are said to be adopted as His children. (Romans 9:4-5; Eph 1:5; John 1:12;Gal 3:26;Romans 8:15). So all believers are adopted into Israel, not as a nation or according to ethnicity, but as the people of God. What you state is the lie because Christianity does not teach that every Hebrew prophet and their prophecies have non-Jews as their target. It recognizes the Messianic prophecies, and sees them as interpreted to apply to the New Covenant, in which God redeems a people for Himself from all nations. The New Covenant is not a covenant with Jew and/or Gentile. It is a covenant with believers!

Yes they were called out of Egypt. All believers are called out of bondage to sin, snatched out of the kingdom of darkness and brought into the kingdom of the Son who He loves. One is temporary and shadows what is to come and is of the earth. The other is eternal and is of heaven.

At least be consistent with yourself and do what you demand that others do. Find a Jewish High Priest from the tribe of Levi and begin sacrificing your lambs. Obey to the letter all the Sabbath laws, and not just the seventh day Sabbath, exactly as they are prescribed in Deut. and Levit. But let me ask you. Why are you laying again upon the shoulders the burden that was too heavy for even Israel to bear? Wasn't that settled at the Jerusalem council?

Your interpretation is unbiblical. But while we are here----are you obeying all of the Torah or are you just implying that you do?
I think you grossly misunderstand the Mosaic Covenant and while I'm at it also the Abrahamic and the New Covenant.
You think "faith" is necessary when it is not.
There is no requirement of "faith" in any of these three covenants Adonai has with Israel.
The three covenants are salvation covenants. Adonai has made promise to save Abraham and his seed no matter if there is faith because the requirement for those in these covenants especially the Mosaic Covenant because Adonai commands it is obedience. And those that claim Christ as Christ followers and don't obey the Torah it will not bode well with them when judgment comes, and the books are opened.
Now, I think I've said and posted the appropriate Scriptures that support believers' obedience to the Law as Jesus Christ was obedient to the Law so I'm going to leave this discussion to concentrate on personal matters. There's an eclipse occurring April 8 which is heavy with prophetic message to America, and I need to spend time studying this because from what I have learned so far in the Hebrew Scriptures related to this eclipse I need to prepare for what's coming and this requires first understanding God's message to this country so I may better survive if it is the Lord's will.
 
Back
Top