• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Regeneration and born again are not synonymous

He never said that!!
Can you summarize for me what you think that he said? BTW, He stated that He believed that the birth of the Church was in the upper room, not at Pentecost. Interesting.
 
Last edited:
Hey David.

I get that. But being born again, at least according to the NT, is the result of the Spirit baptism, which is the result of faith.
No. . .that is not according to the NT.

According to the NT: man is spiritiually dead and spiritually powerless until his spirit is born again into eternal life by the sovereign choice of the Holy Spirit (Jn 3:3-5), whose sovereign choice is as unaccountable as the wind ( Jn 3:6-8).
The only logical conclusion is that regeneration (pre NT faith, OT faith), begot regeneration (born again).
No, according to Scripture, regeneration didn't "beget regeneration". . .rather tortuous construct.

They were reborn into eternal life the OT in the same way they are reborn into eternal life in the NT. . .
through faith in the promise (Ge 15:5, Seed, Jesus Christ, Gal 3:17).
 
Last edited:
Hey Arial

R.C. -- He saying the OT believers looked forward to the cross, and they did, but the cross wasn't realized until it happened. If any OT believer had been with God before the cross, that would, in fact, be God winking at sin. His Holiness would be winking at sin and compromised, His justice would be winking at sin and compromised. How can someone be in God's presence while still being unclean? That would stand the symbolism of the OT sacrifice to enter into the Holy of Holy's on it's head. The sacrifice happens first, then they are able to be with God. You see the illustration of it, right? The illustration that R.C. used suggest the same thing that I've been saying. The fact that he used Romans 3:25 sheds even more light on his point. If atonement was already applied, why would God need to pass over their sins of the OT believers to begin with? He passed over their sin until His justice was actually met. His Holy Standards were actually met. Not by promise, but by realization.

In the OT, just before the cross, in John 3:13. think of the implication of this.

"No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven."

Dave
 
No. . .that is not according to the NT.

According to the NT: man is spiritiually dead and spiritually powerless until his spirit is born again into eternal life by the sovereign choice of the Holy Spirit (Jn 3:3-5), whose sovereign choice is as unaccountable as the wind ( Jn 3:6-8).

But that's the OT, right? Testament means Covenant, and vise versa.

Hebrews 9:16-17 For where there is a testament, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is in force after men are dead, since it has no power at all while the testator lives.

Jesus was recorded crucified in John chapter 19. So John chapter 3 is still the Old Testament. Since Jesus rose from the dead, His covenant/Testament is a permanent one.
No, according to Scripture, regeneration didn't "beget regeneration". . .rather tortuous construct.

It's constructed from Scripture, not tradition.

They were reborn into eternal life the OT in the same way they are reborn into eternal life in the NT. . .
through faith in the promise (Ge 15:5, Seed, Jesus Christ, Gal 3:17).
See John 3:13
 
But that's the OT, right? Testament means Covenant, and vise versa.

Hebrews 9:16-17 For where there is a testament, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is in force after men are dead, since it has no power at all while the testator lives.

Jesus was recorded crucified in John chapter 19. So John chapter 3 is still the Old Testament. Since Jesus rose from the dead, His covenant/Testament is a permanent one.


It's constructed from Scripture, not tradition.


See John 3:13
The Greek word for "born" is "gennao". The Greek word translated "regeneration" is "paliggenesia" made up of two words, "palin" meaning "again, anew", and "genesia", which means "1) source, origin 1a) a book of one’s lineage, i.e. in which his ancestry or progeny are enumerated
2) used of birth, nativity." So in the bible, regeneration and "born again" are the same thing.
 
Back
Top