- Joined
- May 27, 2023
- Messages
- 6,674
- Reaction score
- 4,955
- Points
- 113
- Faith
- Christian/Reformed
- Country
- US
- Politics
- conservative
I think most here agree with that foundational doctrine to the Protestant Christian Faith , of Justification by Faith Alone. What I will attempt to do here is unfold what is behind justification and why we need to be justified.
I do this, because it was my experience in the church for the first 23 years of my conversion, that it is a topic that was never discussed and to my recollection, even mentioned. Admittedly, that covers a small sampling of churches, six or seven, but they were in different parts of the country. Admittedly too, is the fact that they were all non-denominational and Charismatic. However, today we have options at our finger tips to sample from the websites of most churches, the sermons they preach. It is not only the non-denominational and Charismatic that are guilty of this neglect, but many mainline denominational churches as well.
"Justification may be defined as the act by which unjust sinners are made right in the sight of a just and holy God. The supreme need of unjust persons is righteousness. It is the lack of righteousness that is supplied by Christ on behalf of the believing sinner. Justification by faith alone means justification by the righteousness or merit of Christ alone, not by our goodness or good deeds." (From Reformation Study Bible text note Justification by Faith)
This, most of Orthodox Protestants adhere to. It is a forensic righteousness, a legal position before God by the imputation of Christ's righteousness through faith in him.
All well and good, but how did Christ's death on the cross make the unjust, just? What did that death do in relation to the justice of God? Here we must look at his own justice as always and everywhere a just God, who would be a liar if sin did not meet its just punishment. "The soul of one who sins shall die." We cannot have a Savior whose death only appeases an angry God and satisfies his anger against sinners by killing his Son instead. Jesus is not simply saving sinners, he is undoing what was done in Adam. And he is not simply pardoning the sinner, he is redeeming them. Taking them from one condition (a sinner) to another condition (made righteous in Christ). He is not simply removing the penalty for sin, he is conquering sin and its result, death. (Hosea 13:14; Rev 20:14; 2 Tim 1:10; 1 Cor 15:26; 1 Peter 3:18; Col 2:15; Is 25:8; 1 Cor 15:24; Rev 21:1-6) Justice against sin must be met before mercy is given. It is in the cross that mercy and justice kiss. (Psalm 85:8-10.)
In case the argument is given that in the OT sacrificial system God did grant forgiveness without the Son paying the price; it was temporary, also required a blood substitute (a death for death), did not give eternal life, did not provide justification except to a few and that through faith, not the sacrifice, and its temporariness made space and time for the appointed time of Chris's incarnation.
On the cross, Jesus gave himself as a ransom. That is, he took the penalty upon his own flesh and blood body, that the sinner deserved. He made the payment in their stead. The penalty they deserved, death, he himself bore, satisfying God's justice against sin. He died, that he might rise again from the dead, the first fruits of all those he died for. In this, he conquered the power of sin to condemn those he died for, by giving to them his imputed righteousness, undoing also the imputed to them, the sinfulness of Adam. ( Romans 8:1-4; Romans 5:6-11, 19) Therefore, the believer, through faith in the person and work of Jesus, is fully reconciled to God. His sins are not just forgiven, they are paid for, actually. Jesus did not just take a beating and die in our place. He was accomplishing something.
If Christ's death on the cross paid for the sins of everyone actually, then everyone would be justified before God, reconciled to him. There wouldn't even be any need for faith. If it was not an actual payment that was made, but rather just a body given, it did not satisfy God's justice against sin, and in fact could be considered an injustice in that the perfectly righteous simply agreed to suffer and die as God willed it. The innocent instead of the guilty but the problem of sin and the fall, not really dealt with. It would have no power to conquer and eventually destroy sin from humanity and from the world. Sin and death are real. So something real must be done to defeat them. It is said in the scriptures that Jesus game himself as a ransom. A ransom is a real payment that removes the penalty attached to it from the one who committed the act that required the penalty.
To understand what it means to be justified and how that is accomplished we must begin and end and keep consistent throughout: Who is God? What is the problem to be solved? How does God solve it in Christ? What is his end purpose that consistently works through the historical accounts of redemption, and that he tells us in the scriptures? How was the person and work of Jesus able to do this in his death and resurrection?
I do this, because it was my experience in the church for the first 23 years of my conversion, that it is a topic that was never discussed and to my recollection, even mentioned. Admittedly, that covers a small sampling of churches, six or seven, but they were in different parts of the country. Admittedly too, is the fact that they were all non-denominational and Charismatic. However, today we have options at our finger tips to sample from the websites of most churches, the sermons they preach. It is not only the non-denominational and Charismatic that are guilty of this neglect, but many mainline denominational churches as well.
"Justification may be defined as the act by which unjust sinners are made right in the sight of a just and holy God. The supreme need of unjust persons is righteousness. It is the lack of righteousness that is supplied by Christ on behalf of the believing sinner. Justification by faith alone means justification by the righteousness or merit of Christ alone, not by our goodness or good deeds." (From Reformation Study Bible text note Justification by Faith)
This, most of Orthodox Protestants adhere to. It is a forensic righteousness, a legal position before God by the imputation of Christ's righteousness through faith in him.
All well and good, but how did Christ's death on the cross make the unjust, just? What did that death do in relation to the justice of God? Here we must look at his own justice as always and everywhere a just God, who would be a liar if sin did not meet its just punishment. "The soul of one who sins shall die." We cannot have a Savior whose death only appeases an angry God and satisfies his anger against sinners by killing his Son instead. Jesus is not simply saving sinners, he is undoing what was done in Adam. And he is not simply pardoning the sinner, he is redeeming them. Taking them from one condition (a sinner) to another condition (made righteous in Christ). He is not simply removing the penalty for sin, he is conquering sin and its result, death. (Hosea 13:14; Rev 20:14; 2 Tim 1:10; 1 Cor 15:26; 1 Peter 3:18; Col 2:15; Is 25:8; 1 Cor 15:24; Rev 21:1-6) Justice against sin must be met before mercy is given. It is in the cross that mercy and justice kiss. (Psalm 85:8-10.)
In case the argument is given that in the OT sacrificial system God did grant forgiveness without the Son paying the price; it was temporary, also required a blood substitute (a death for death), did not give eternal life, did not provide justification except to a few and that through faith, not the sacrifice, and its temporariness made space and time for the appointed time of Chris's incarnation.
On the cross, Jesus gave himself as a ransom. That is, he took the penalty upon his own flesh and blood body, that the sinner deserved. He made the payment in their stead. The penalty they deserved, death, he himself bore, satisfying God's justice against sin. He died, that he might rise again from the dead, the first fruits of all those he died for. In this, he conquered the power of sin to condemn those he died for, by giving to them his imputed righteousness, undoing also the imputed to them, the sinfulness of Adam. ( Romans 8:1-4; Romans 5:6-11, 19) Therefore, the believer, through faith in the person and work of Jesus, is fully reconciled to God. His sins are not just forgiven, they are paid for, actually. Jesus did not just take a beating and die in our place. He was accomplishing something.
If Christ's death on the cross paid for the sins of everyone actually, then everyone would be justified before God, reconciled to him. There wouldn't even be any need for faith. If it was not an actual payment that was made, but rather just a body given, it did not satisfy God's justice against sin, and in fact could be considered an injustice in that the perfectly righteous simply agreed to suffer and die as God willed it. The innocent instead of the guilty but the problem of sin and the fall, not really dealt with. It would have no power to conquer and eventually destroy sin from humanity and from the world. Sin and death are real. So something real must be done to defeat them. It is said in the scriptures that Jesus game himself as a ransom. A ransom is a real payment that removes the penalty attached to it from the one who committed the act that required the penalty.
To understand what it means to be justified and how that is accomplished we must begin and end and keep consistent throughout: Who is God? What is the problem to be solved? How does God solve it in Christ? What is his end purpose that consistently works through the historical accounts of redemption, and that he tells us in the scriptures? How was the person and work of Jesus able to do this in his death and resurrection?