• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Interpreting Scripture

Carbon

Admin
Joined
May 19, 2023
Messages
5,598
Reaction score
4,543
Points
113
Location
New England
Faith
Reformed
Country
USA
Marital status
Married
Politics
Conservative
Ch 1 WCF, we have a rule of interpretation.

The infallible rule of interpretation of scripture is the scripture itself; and therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any scripture, (which is not manifold, but one) it may be searched and known by other places that speak more clearly. (1.10)
 
Ch 1 WCF, we have a rule of interpretation.

The infallible rule of interpretation of scripture is the scripture itself; and therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any scripture, (which is not manifold, but one) it may be searched and known by other places that speak more clearly. (1.10)
This rule has been called the "analogy of Scripture" or the "analogy of faith."

Charles Hodge stated its importance.
If the scriptures be what they claim to be, the word of God, they are the work of one mind, and that mind divine. From this, it follows that Scripture cannot contradict Scripture. God cannot teach in one place anything which is inconsistent with what He teaches in another. Hence Scripture must explain Scripture.
 
No doctrine concerning Scripture is of more importance to the bible student than that which affirms its unity and harmony. From that principle flow the following rules for interpreting scripture.

1) When the plain sense of scripture is clear, seek no other sense; therefore, take every work at its usual, literal, primary meaning unless the context dictates otherwise.
2) Subordinate passages must always be interpreted in the light of leading truths.
3) What is obscure must be interpreted by the light of what is plain. Peripheral ambiguities must be interpreted in harmony with fundamental certainties. No interpretation of any text, therefore, is right which does not agree with the principles of religion, the Apostles Creed, the Lord's prayer, and the Ten Commandments.

In addition, if you have only one passage of Scripture on which to form some important doctrine, you will probably find, on closer examination, that you have none.
 
3) What is obscure must be interpreted by the light of what is plain. Peripheral ambiguities must be interpreted in harmony with fundamental certainties. No interpretation of any text, therefore, is right which does not agree with the principles of religion, the Apostles Creed, the Lord's prayer, and the Ten Commandments.

Apostle creed like the Lord's prayer or Rosay are oral traditions. They could agree with ones understanding of scripture. But are never a source of faith. . the power of God's labor of love . . . not of dying mankind.

Like Apostolic succession or apostolical time period. . destroying the intended meaning of sent messenger (apostle) or prophet therefore violating the law (Deuteronomy 4:2) not to add or subtract from sola scriptura,

How to define the word apostle. Some make the apostles a venerable source of faith or power of Christ. limiting to the new testament leaving out the Old Testament apostles beginning with Abel the prophet and first martyr. . .using Abel .teaching a man must be born again.

As born-again believers like any religion we guard that which defends us (as it is written sola scriptura) every religion has an outward written law or one given with symbols used as idol images .

Catholic have their CCC as their own personal Bible called Devine sacred traditions of dying mankind their written defense

Jehovah witness their own book of law coming from false prophecies of their founder.
.
Mormons the same venerate the beatiful feet of the sent messenger's pony express ,western union, etc. they call discrete Elders numbering them

Every religion except Christianity must follow after the dying things of this world, the Pagan foundation. . Out of sight out of mined God calls fools

Good example of following the leader like a Pope dying mankind Nicodemus some fell from grace doing the first works empowered by the father to both hear and move dying mankind to obey

Revalation 2:2-3I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:;And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name's sake hast laboured, and hast not fainted. Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love.; (Believe God and follow) Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; (Believe God and follow)or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent. But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitanes, which I also hate.;He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.

The word apostle like a few other Greek words should have been given the English understanding. It would have saved much grief as in "who is the greatest"? Dying mankind seen or eternal God not seen?

Satan the author of confusion or wonderment would have dying mankind wonder, wonder, wonder with no end Limbo in sight.

Just as if it was true prophecy which Christ is no longer adding to for over two thousand years. He is not inspiring new.

Needing more that he offers (sola scriptura) another doctrine
 
Apostle creed like the Lord's prayer or Rosay are oral traditions.
I assure you my friend, these two are quite different.
 
Ch 1 WCF, we have a rule of interpretation.

The infallible rule of interpretation of scripture is the scripture itself; and therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any scripture, (which is not manifold, but one) it may be searched and known by other places that speak more clearly. (1.10)
This rule has been called the "analogy of Scripture" or the "analogy of faith."

Charles Hodge stated its importance.
If the scriptures be what they claim to be, the word of God, they are the work of one mind, and that mind divine. From this, it follows that Scripture cannot contradict Scripture. God cannot teach in one place anything which is inconsistent with what He teaches in another. Hence Scripture must explain Scripture.
Those two are related, but not one-and-the-same. The understanding of the second, (that Scripture is entirely consistent), does necessarily follow from the first but the first is the rule of interpretation, the second is not.

But maybe you meant to include the second as only "the analogy of Scripture (or faith)" and not as part of the "rule of interpretation". Am I being unnecessarily nit-picky again?
 
No doctrine concerning Scripture is of more importance to the bible student than that which affirms its unity and harmony. From that principle flow the following rules for interpreting scripture.

1) When the plain sense of scripture is clear, seek no other sense; therefore, take every work at its usual, literal, primary meaning unless the context dictates otherwise.
2) Subordinate passages must always be interpreted in the light of leading truths.
3) What is obscure must be interpreted by the light of what is plain. Peripheral ambiguities must be interpreted in harmony with fundamental certainties. No interpretation of any text, therefore, is right which does not agree with the principles of religion, the Apostles Creed, the Lord's prayer, and the Ten Commandments.

In addition, if you have only one passage of Scripture on which to form some important doctrine, you will probably find, on closer examination, that you have none.
I would note a caution here: These rules are followed, or so they think, by many cultic proponents. 1) is subjective; 2) "dissenting voices" (according to their use of #1) in scripture are not dissenting, but must be reworked; 3) What is obscure can be ignored, pulled apart and reorganized, ignoring what doesn't fit as unimportant, or, in some way, the whole obscure statement "spiritualized" to fit #1's thesis.
 
I would note a caution here: These rules are followed, or so they think, by many cultic proponents. 1) is subjective; 2) "dissenting voices" (according to their use of #1) in scripture are not dissenting, but must be reworked; 3) What is obscure can be ignored, pulled apart and reorganized, ignoring what doesn't fit as unimportant, or, in some way, the whole obscure statement "spiritualized" to fit #1's thesis.
The cults and the RC'c have other methods of interpreting scripture. The RCC teaches only the Church and the pope has the authority.
The cults? Well, ..... :(
 
The cults and the RC'c have other methods of interpreting scripture. The RCC teaches only the Church and the pope has the authority.
The cults? Well, ..... :(
Yep. And the RCC is different from other cults, in that way, though in a more careful inspection, the other cults all have their little magisterium, I think.

My point is that those 3 points do not educate everyone equally, though they are obvious common sense. They are already being followed by many cults, but by pushing their presuppositions onto the (#1) "plain reading".
 
Yep. And the RCC is different from other cults, in that way, though in a more careful inspection, the other cults all have their little magisterium, I think.

My point is that those 3 points do not educate everyone equally, though they are obvious common sense. They are already being followed by many cults, but by pushing their presuppositions onto the (#1) "plain reading".
Ok, got ya. Yep (y)
 
They were inspired and led by the Holy Spirit. Way beyond hermeneutic classes, lol. :giggle: ;)

Ahhh but so are you, if you are in Christ. You just aren't inspired to write, but rather to expound upon hidden treasures found within those beautiful pages! Of which there is no limit. (Of treasure, that is)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ahhh but so are you, if you are in Christ. You just aren't inspired to write, but rather to expound upon hidden treasures found within those beautiful pages! Of which there is no limit. (Of treasure, that is)
But not for writing Scripture.
 
Back
Top