First, there is not one jot or tittle in the whole bible that makes reference to such a prominent, superior, and infallible judge. No one to judge in disputes and ascertain the meaning of the scriptures.
Much less is there any reference that such authority is vested with assemblies of the RCC or with the pope. Let just one proof text be produced!
If there was such proof in scripture I know Rome would have made mention of such a privilege. And on such an important matter, if it were true even the apostle Peter would have made mention. With something of such importance, Peter would have given some mention of such a pope exceeding him with such authority.
Peter does not mention a word relating to this matter; in fact scripture tells us that Peter was rebuked by Paul -
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. Gal 2:11. At the first ecclesiastical assembly held in Jerusalem (Off to a bad start huh?
)
And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me: Acts 15:13. Peter was not even the chairman, but the assembly acted according to the judgment of James.
Thus, all the action of the pope is nothing but a usurpation of authority.
The RCC and her pope presumptuously claim authority for herself which is neither received nor can validate.
So far, no good. Nope!