• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

In all the religious clutter of disputes and arguments, what are the only essential doctrines of salvation?

Nicodemus could not see the kingdom of God at work bc he was confined in physical descent (lineage) in Judaism. He could not see the kingdom doing things.

While there is a new life, it happens when a person understands vs 16+—that God was in Christ and made a way for condemnation from sin to be taken away through the righteousness that Christ completed.
 
everything I have posted is only about Jesus being in complete 100% control of everything given to Jesus by the Father.
What you say and what you do is the opposite.

You don't accept Him as the Lord by dismissing His word of His Father as His God.

bye.
 
Nicodemus could not see the kingdom of God at work bc he was confined in physical descent (lineage) in Judaism. He could not see the kingdom doing things.

While there is a new life, it happens when a person understands vs 16+—that God was in Christ and made a way for condemnation from sin to be taken away through the righteousness that Christ completed.
Your reasoning is meaningless.

You are not born again.

bye.
 
You have to be born again for salvation.

I will teach you what it means:

You have to trust all that Jesus says and do them.

Jesus is the Lord. If you are not born again, your devotion is not for Jesus.
Show a verse that "Jesus says follow the old law or follow the old ten commandments" I can not find any verse that says that. I can post about 30 Verses that say the Law is done away with if you like.
 
Your reasoning is meaningless.

You are not born again.

bye.

That's not for you to say, friend. I have been a Christian for 50 years. I know my way around. This does not change that Jn 3's person (Nicodemus) was being told how to see the kingdom at work. Being born from above is not a command from Christ like 'you shall not steal.' It is a description of a problem.
 
Simple -
When you are CONVICTED OF YOUR SIN by the Holy Spirit (the beginning of FAITH), you're then able to REPENT of your SIN and cry out to God IN FAITH for salvation.

THEN you're "Born Again", and indwelled by the Holy Spirit, who'll lead you into truth when you take HIS YOKE upon you, and start learning of Him, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit being your primary sources.

SOME Church systems can help your journey, But Other NON-BIBLICAL church systems can lead into confusion.

Ignorance of what the Bible says, makes you FAIR GAME for deception.
Well put. God saves those who choose to commit their ways to Him.
 
Show a verse that "Jesus says follow the old law or follow the old ten commandments" I can not find any verse that says that. I can post about 30 Verses that say the Law is done away with if you like.

But justification is the question. The only thing that solves this is the justifying righteousness of Christ, which is not an experience inside us, even though we become more like him. It is credited, imputed. That is very different from internal change, and has to do with sin as a debt, like the classic hymn 'Rock of Ages.'
 
But justification is the question. The only thing that solves this is the justifying righteousness of Christ, which is not an experience inside us, even though we become more like him. It is credited, imputed. That is very different from internal change, and has to do with sin as a debt, like the classic hymn 'Rock of Ages.'
Gal 2
16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
 
But justification is the question. The only thing that solves this is the justifying righteousness of Christ, which is not an experience inside us, even though we become more like him. It is credited, imputed. That is very different from internal change, and has to do with sin as a debt, like the classic hymn 'Rock of Ages.'
My question is: If the law was done away with, what are we justified to? A follow-up question would be: If the law was done away with then what condemned Christ to death?
 
My question is: If the law was done away with, what are we justified to? A follow-up question would be: If the law was done away with then what condemned Christ to death?

There is no being justified to. Did you mean ...to do? That would be to the heart of the law, not the ceremonial and dietary.

Yes sinning against the law (by others) was laid on him.
 
My question is: If the law was done away with, what are we justified to? A follow-up question would be: If the law was done away with then what condemned Christ to death?
See Gal 2:16 you are justified by having Faith in Jesus the one sent by God the Father to Save us , the same one that Israel rejected. If you believe in Jesus then the free gift of justification is accounted as righteous thru Jesus by god the Father
 
See Gal 2:16 you are justified by having Faith in Jesus the one sent by God the Father to Save us , the same one that Israel rejected. If you believe in Jesus then the free gift of justification is accounted as righteous thru Jesus by god the Father
Yes, but the question is justified to what? What is the metric that we are justified to. Christ suffered and died to take our wages of sin upon Himself that we might live eternall through and with him. But where there is no law, there is no sin, so if the law is done away with, there was no need for Chrst to suffer for our sins since we could not be guilty of law breaking.

Perhaps the laws has not been done away with but it has been fulfilled by Christ so that we may face it fully justified to its standards because of Chrost's imputed rigteousness. This would explain a lot. Paul never says that the law itself was done away with, he only states that we have a righteousness apart from its works which none of us could accomplish anyway.
 
Back
Top