• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Image of God, Original Sin, and Evolution

I agree. But that doesn't mean there are no explanations. Ask @John Bauer . It can mean that they were the first two in/of a certain circumstance, and Adam being the federal head doesn't mean necessarily he was genetically first.
I take though as literal history that God created Adam as first man, and that he did not come as from primate parents
 
I take though as literal history that God created Adam as first man, and that he did not come as from primate parents
Right. That is how I read it, too. But, like I said, how I read it is not the only way it can be read. I.e. I can be wrong.
 
Right. That is how I read it, too. But, like I said, how I read it is not the only way it can be read. I.e. I can be wrong.
Seems though that those holding to another view are trying to fit evolutionary process in trying to make it fit based upon preconceived notions
 
Back
Top