Free Will

[fastfredy0]

Are you seriously calling the Apostle Paul guilty of false teaching?

I don't see anything in @Behold 's comments in post #511 that you refer to that calls Paul's teaching to be false.

Now, you and I may disagree with Behold's interpretation, but that's another matter.

 

[ReverendRV]

I don't see anything in @Behold 's comments in post #511 that you refer to that calls Paul's teaching to be false.

Now, you and I may disagree with Behold's interpretation, but that's another matter.

I was wondering the same thing...

 

[Eleanor]

I was wondering the same thing...

I don't see anything in @Behold 's comments in post #511 that you refer to that calls Paul's teaching to be false.

Now, you and I may disagree with Behold's interpretation, but that's another matter.

"They are not predestined to be saved"?

 

[ReverendRV]

"They are not predestined to be saved"?

The Unconditionally Elect are Predestined to be Saved, Eleanor...

 

[Eleanor]

The Unconditionally Elect are Predestined to be Saved, Eleanor...

That is what is "pre-destined"........not their salvation, as a false theology teaches.

The above is to what I am referring in regard to "calling Paul's teaching to be false."

What am I missing here?

 

[fastfredy0]

The above is to what I am referring in regard to "calling Paul's teaching to be false."

What am I missing here?

IMO ... @Behold does not say Paul has false teachings; rather, Behold thinks we interpret Paul teaching incorrectly (falsely).

That being said, what Behold wrote is a little 'wordy' for me to understand. I think he's saying God's foreknowledge is not God's choosing of the elect, but knowledge of who will choose to salvificly believe independently of God and thus become God's elect.

Again ... it's too wordy for me. All I am fairly sure of is that Behold did not accuse Paul of false teaching ... (this is becoming a tempests in a teapot )

 

[ReverendRV]

The above is to what I am referring in regard to "calling Paul's teaching to be false."

What am I missing here?

As a Rule, Saint Paul's Doctrine cannot be wrong. It's our interpretation that can be Right or wrong...