Did God Repent?

[makesends]

In 1822 A.Kneeland, a Greek scholar translated the NT from the same Greek Lexicons all use. He compared Greek to English side by side to prove to the world-a god belongs in the last line at John 1:1)-19 other translations had a god, 3 had was divine, 1 had was godlike. All rejected by trinity religions because that single fact proves they are false religions. a mass of confusion because of lack of holy spirit. God warned all--GET OUT OF HER.

So what are you still doing here?

 

[Keiw1]

So what are you still doing here?

Luke 10-Acts 20:20--the work doesn't stop until the end.

 

[Eleanor]

In 1822 A.Kneeland, a Greek scholar translated the NT from the same Greek Lexicons all use. He compared Greek to English side by side to prove to the world-a god belongs in the last line at John 1:1)-19 other translations had a god, 3 had was divine, 1 had was godlike. All rejected by trinity religions because that single fact proves they are false religions. a mass of confusion because of lack of holy spirit. God warned all--GET OUT OF HER.

Misunderstanding of, lack of resarch regarding what you are referring to as "a-god."

 

[Keiw1]

Misunderstanding of, lack of resarch regarding what you are referring to as "a-god."

No misunderstanding. I say every trinity scholar knows its fact, yet say nothing. Maybe you ask those scholars and trinity teachers why they use altered versions of Gods written word. They know 100% God willed his name in his bible over 7000 places. Ask them why they keep his name removed to stand against his will.

 

[Eleanor]

No misunderstanding. I say every trinity scholar knows its fact, yet say nothing.

They don't need to in light of the following, wherein both Jesus and the Holy Spirit are God,
and presented in NT teaching from the beginning.

1) We have three separate persons (divine agents), Father, Son and Holy Spirit,
presented in the work of salvation:

a)--at its beginning (Luke 1:35),
-----at the inauguration of Jesus' public ministry (Matthew 3:16-17) and
-----in the work of atonement (Hebrews 9:14),

b) the Holy Spirit completing the work (salvation) of the Father through the Son
(Acts 2:38-39; Romans 8:26; 1 Corinthians 12:4-6; Ephesians 1:3-14, Ephesians 2:13-22; 2 Thessalonians 2:13; 1 Peter 1:2),

c) the only way to enter the kingdom of the Father (salvation) is through faith in the Son and regeneration by the Holy Spirit (John 3:1-15).

2) And Jesus shows the personhoods of three distinct and separate divine agents:

The Son is sent by the Father, in the Father's name (John 5:23, 36, 43).
The Spirit is sent by the Father in the Son's name (John 14:26).
The Spirit is subject to the Son as well as to the Father, for the Spirit is sent by the Son as well as the Father (John 15:26, 16:7, 14:26).

One doesn't send oneself, one sends another who is separate from oneself.

The Trinity--one God in three separate divine persons--is presented in NT teaching from the beginning.

 

[Maliah]

Repented
The Hebrew word used here is y in'nā'hem, from the root word nacham. The word is exclusively about emotions: a feeling of pain, sadness, or unhappiness
[grieved]

 

[Eleanor]

In 1822 A.Kneeland, a Greek scholar translated the NT from the same Greek Lexicons all use. He compared Greek to English side by side to prove to the world-a god belongs in the last line at John 1:1)-19 other translations had a god, 3 had was divine, 1 had was godlike. All rejected by trinity religions because that single fact proves they are false religions. a mass of confusion because of lack of holy spirit. God warned all--GET OUT OF HER.

In the light of the whole NT, the "scholarship" of your "scholars" limps somewhat.

So who/where/what was this "a-god" before he
1) became flesh (what was a-god before he was flesh?),
2) was conceived by the promised Holy Spirit, not by human father,
3) who saved "his people" (not all people) from their sin,
4) sent the promised Holy Spirit of God after his death (in spite of "lack of holy spirit")?

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.

Since the sacrifice for human sin was provisioned even before the world was created

Thank you; I'm confident that your point is very definitely worth noting.

● 1Pet 1:18-20 . . For you know that God paid a ransom to save you from the
empty life you inherited from your ancestors. And the ransom he paid was not mere
gold or silver. He paid for you with the precious lifeblood of Christ, the sinless,
spotless Lamb of God. God chose him for this purpose long before the world began.

● Rev 13:8 . . All who dwell on the earth will worship the beast whose names have
not been written in the book of life of the lamb slain from the foundation of the
world.

In other words: Christ wasn't an EMT paramedic sent to an unexpected train wreck;
no, he was scheduled for that event before the train was even manufactured and/or
preparations made for its roadbed.

it's obvious God knew we would sin.

I'm confident that God knew ahead of time that Adam would taste the forbidden
fruit, and that He would kill off a majority of the world's population with a global
deluge, and that He would incinerate Sodom and Gomorrah, and that He would
condemn millions of souls to the lake of brimstone depicted at Rev 20:11-15
wherein the lost's resurrected bodies will be terminated by a mode of death akin to
a foundry worker falling into a kettle of molten iron.

How, then, is Genesis 6:6 to be explained? In what way did God repent?

I started reading the Bible in 1968 but it wasn't till 1972 that I became an on-going
student of the Bible via radio, sermons, lectures, special seminars, books, Sunday
school classes, and last of all YouTube. Well; in all those 55 years of reading and
on-going Bible study, nobody yet that I've experienced has come up with a
satisfactory answer to your inquiry. God knew in advance that there'd come a day
when He'd regret creating human life and yet, He proceeded to create human life
anyway.

Is it any wonder then why so many intelligent folks consider the Bible's God to be a
sadistic lunatic who finds rather odd ways to amuse Himself at the expense of
fragile creatures helpless to defend themselves against such overwhelming
violence?

I'm goin' off the rails
On a crazy train.
Ozzy Osbourne, 1980
_

 

[Eleanor]

Is it any wonder then why so many intelligent folks consider the Bible's God to be a
sadistic lunatic who finds rather odd ways to amuse Himself at the expense of
fragile creatures helpless to defend themselves against such overwhelming
violence?

Yep, it shuts out the reprobates.

 

[Keiw1]

They don't need to in light of the following, wherein both Jesus and the Holy Spirit are God,
and presented in NT teaching from the beginning.

1) We have three separate persons (divine agents), Father, Son and Holy Spirit,
presented in the work of salvation:

a)--at its beginning (Luke 1:35),
-----at the inauguration of Jesus' public ministry (Matthew 3:16-17) and
-----in the work of atonement (Hebrews 9:14),

b) the Holy Spirit completing the work (salvation) of the Father through the Son
(Acts 2:38-39; Romans 8:26; 1 Corinthians 12:4-6; Ephesians 1:3-14, Ephesians 2:13-22; 2 Thessalonians 2:13; 1 Peter 1:2),

c) the only way to enter the kingdom of the Father (salvation) is through faith in the Son and regeneration by the Holy Spirit (John 3:1-15).

2) And Jesus shows the personhoods of three distinct and separate divine agents:

The Son is sent by the Father, in the Father's name (John 5:23, 36, 43).
The Spirit is sent by the Father in the Son's name (John 14:26).
The Spirit is subject to the Son as well as to the Father, for the Spirit is sent by the Son as well as the Father (John 15:26, 16:7, 14:26).

One doesn't send oneself, one sends another who is separate from oneself.

The Trinity--one God in three separate divine persons--is presented in NT teaching from the beginning.

Jesus says--The one who sent him= Father is THE ONLY TRUE GOD( John 17:3)--We all must choose who we believe. You are mislead to believe errors translated in to fit false council teachings over Jesus truth, out of altered translations by satans will to mislead.

 

[Keiw1]

In the light of the whole NT, the "scholarship" of your "scholars" limps somewhat.

So who/where/what was this "a-god" before he
1) became flesh (what was a-god before he was flesh?),
2) was conceived by the promised Holy Spirit, not by human father,
3) who saved "his people" (not all people) from their sin,
4) sent the promised Holy Spirit of God after his death (in spite of "lack of holy spirit")?

Michael is the one sent to earth. God sent his best. You see if you believe Jesus over error, at John 17:3--we all can read English and it teaches-The ONLY TRUE GOD( Father)sent another to earth, named Jesus as a mortal, That means God did not come down here. We all know that Jesus( the being God sent down here) was by Gods side during the creation process, because all other things were created through the being who was sent. And at Prov 8= Gods master worker= The one beside God during the creation process, tells all he was created (8:22-25)= created direct, first and last all other things created through that one. All evidence points to Michael being that one.

 

[Eleanor]

Michael is the one sent to earth. God sent his best. You see if you believe Jesus over error, at John 17:3--we all can read English and it teaches-The ONLY TRUE GOD( Father)sent another to earth, named Jesus as a mortal, That means God did not come down here. We all know that Jesus( the being God sent down here) was by Gods side during the creation process, because all other things were created through the being who was sent. And at Prov 8= Gods master worker= The one beside God during the creation process, tells all he was created (8:22-25)= created direct, first and last all other things created through that one. All evidence points to Michael being that one.

Oh, wow!

Well, yours is definitely not orthodox apostolic Christianity, but some heretical sect.

 

[Keiw1]

Oh, wow!

Well, yours is definitely not orthodox apostolic Christianity, but some heretical sect.

Actually Catholicisms own encyclopedia assures all-The apostles knew 0 of God being a trinity.) They served the true God=the Abrahamic God= a single being God named-YHWH(Jehovah) all true followers do. So its the opposite in reality of your reasoning.

 

[Eleanor]

Actually Catholicisms own encyclopedia assures all-The apostles knew 0 of God being a trinity.) They served the true God=the Abrahamic God= a single being God named-YHWH(Jehovah) all true followers do. So its the opposite in reality of your reasoning.

Did orthodoxy end with the apostles?

I don't take my doctrine from the Catholic Encyclopedia.

 

[Keiw1]

Did orthodoxy end with the apostles?

I don't take my doctrine from the Catholic Encyclopedia.

Catholics were the first trinity religion. They were there back in the early centuries. I say 100% the trinity scholars today, know 100% Israel NEVER served a trinity. And that neither did Jesus or the apostles.

 

[Eleanor]

Catholics were the first trinity religion. They were there back in the early centuries. I say 100% the trinity scholars today, know 100% Israel NEVER served a trinity. And that neither did Jesus or the apostles.

Jesus was the Trinity according to John the apostle.

So who/where/what was this "a-god" before he
1) became flesh (what was a-god before he was flesh?),
2) was conceived by the promised Holy Spirit, not by human father,
3) who saved "his people" (not all people) from their sin,
4) sent the promised Holy Spirit of God after his death (in spite of "lack of holy spirit")?

The angel Michael was not conceived by the Holy Spirit, for the divine does not beget the angelical.
Nor being divine, he didn't have the moxy to satisfy divine justice.
Nor did he have the authority to "send" the divine Holy Spirit.

That's a fail.

So who was this "a-god?"

 

[Keiw1]

Jesus was the Trinity according to John the apostle.

So who/where/what was this "a-god" before he
1) became flesh (what was a-god before he was flesh?),
2) was conceived by the promised Holy Spirit, not by human father,
3) who saved "his people" (not all people) from their sin,
4) sent the promised Holy Spirit of God after his death (in spite of "lack of holy spirit")?

The angel Michael was not conceived by the Holy Spirit, for the divine does not beget the angelical.
Nor being divine, he didn't have the moxy to satisfy divine justice.
Nor did he have the authority to "send" the divine Holy Spirit.

That's a fail.

So who was this "a-god?"

A god means-has godlike qualities--Because God did all the powerful works through Jesus-Acts2:22, 1 Cor 8:5-6-- The holy spirit isnt a living being, its Gods active force.