Thanks so very much "
David Lamb "
for taking important time to reply to me, i appreciate the great opportunity to discuss this
in defense of what i was explaining, let's look at the example of Melchizedek
Melchizedek was made, created in the " likeness as a resemblance or similar " to a son of God but was not a son of God in the same manner as Jesus nor as humans born as human children ....!
Heb 7:3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.
Yet, Melchizedek was not of the seed of David, nor was he a Son that was begotten in likeness of sinful flesh,
Melchizedek was never born as a baby / SON - yet, Melchizedek was made similar or likeness as a resemblance or similar " - to the Son Of God......... Melchizedek was not said to be a son of God and was never born on earth as a son whereas Jesus, Anointing / Christ - he was born as a son.
Melchizedek was never conceived by a woman
Melchizedek and Jesus were very different - Jesus was created in the likeness of sinful flesh, born as a son from a human birth. Melchizedek could never be a " son of God " - and he could never be born again because he was never born of a woman…
Melchizedek … made like unto the Son of God -
Melchizedek ….. similar to or resembling the Son of God
Melchizedek ….. was never a son of anyone and never a Son of God - he was never born.
similar (in appearance or character): - like, + manner - but not the same as Jesus the Son.
furthermore ............ when we read the King James Translation
we notice that there are 30 phrases with the words " " SON OF " " in italics
these words are in italics because the phrase " " SON OF " " is not in the Greek manuscripts but are inserted in italics to show that this was inserted by the translators
and even the Catholic Douay Rheims Translation here below simply says
Luk 3:38 Henos, who was of Seth, who was of Adam, who was of God.
the King James Translators placed the words " " SON OF " " in italics to show that Adam was never called a Son Of God in the original Greek,
here is how the original manuscripts are written
Luk 3:23 And himself it is him Jesus about year thirty and he began and was as supposed
son of Joseph - - of Heli
και And - αυτος himself - ην it is - ο him - ιησους Jesus - ωσει about - ετων year - τριακοντα thirty - αρχομενος and he began - ων and was - ως as - ενομιζετο supposed - υιος son - ιωσηφ of Joseph - του of - ηλι Heli
the manuscripts do not continue to next say { which was the son of. }
here below - is exactly how the manuscripts are written
of Matthat, of Levi, of Melchi, of Janna, of Joseph, of Mattathias, of Amos, of Naum, of Esli, of Nagge, of Maath, of Mattathias, of Semei, of Joseph, of Juda, of Joanna, of Rhesa, of Zorobabel, of Salathiel, of Neri, of Melchi, of Addi, of Cosam, of Elmodam, of Er, of Jose, of Eliezer, of Jorim, of Matthat, of Levi, of Simeon, of Juda, of Joseph, of Jonan, of Eliakim, of Melea, of Menan, of Mattatha, of Nathan, of David, of Jesse, of Obed, of Booz, of Salmon, of Naasson, of Aminadab, of Aram, of Esrom, of Phares, of Juda, of Jacob, of Isaac, of Abraham, of Thara, of Nachor, of Saruch, of Ragau, of Phalec, of Heber, of Sala, of Cainan, of Arphaxad, of Sem, of Noe, of Lamech, of Mathusala, of Enoch, of Jared, of Maleleel, of Cainan, ------ of Enos, of Seth, of Adam, of God.
the scriptures in Greek simply do not say that Adam was a son of God and the King James place the " " SON OF " " in italics to indicate that this was added into the translation and not a part of the original message.
I believe that the Scriptures show that Melchizedek was said to be made similar and in the likeness of the Son of God but was not the same as Jesus in that he was never born and was never a son born of a woman just as Adam.
there are different meanings and ways in which God is a Father - in different meanings
Jas 1:17 God is "
the Father of lights "
18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth
Heb 1:5 For unto which of the
angels said he at any time,
Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and
he " an angel " shall be to me a Son?
even Satan /
The Devil is a called "
Father "
Joh 8:44 Ye are of
your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.............for he is a liar, and the
father of it.
do the scriptures show that Adam and Melchizedek
are not Sons of God in the same way that
humans whom are born to human mothers .........
do the scriptures show that anyone who is
not born as a child to a human mother as a son or daughter - is never considered to be a Child Of God in the same way as one whom is born again
for if one was never born - they can not be reborn / born again...
Angels can not be born again and God does call himself " Father Of Lights " but never a Father of Angels in the same way as humans,
humans whom are born of a woman on earth as sons and daughters of God and are called sons and daughters only because they are created as children - born to be reborn in the spirit.
.
