• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Why don't Calvinist believe the Gospel?

Dave

Sophomore
Joined
Jan 26, 2025
Messages
439
Reaction score
397
Points
63
I was challenged by Josheb to provide one verse that claimed 'believe and be saved'. I've been told by him that Romans 10:9-13 is not the Gospel because it was written to believers. I asked Him to share what he thinks the Gospel is, many times, but he won't. Then there are those who liked the post quoted below. Paul said this Gospel that we preach.

Romans 10:9-13 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, "Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame." For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For "whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."

Here's the quote by Josheb
Nowhere in the entirety of the Bible does scripture ever state "saved by faith." Nowhere. We are saved by grace through faith for works. We are justified by faith, not saved by faith. BIG difference.

From post # 65 in the thread "Regeneration and born again are not synonymous", page 4.

Here's some more.


Why don't Calvinists believe the Gospel?
 
I was challenged by Josheb to provide one verse that claimed 'believe and be saved'.
That is NOT what was requested. What I asked for was a verse explicitly reporting an unsaved, unregenerate non-believing person coming to God for salvation in which the scriptures explicitly attribute the cause of his actions to the faculties of his or her sinful flesh.
I've been told by him that Romans 10:9-13 is not the Gospel because it was written to believers.
I never said any such thing. What I did say is the salvation mentioned in Romans 10 is eschatological, not soteriological. What I said was the verses you selectively removed from their stated contexts was written ABOUT believers, not just to believers.
I asked Him to share what he thinks the Gospel is, many times, but he won't.
Hogwash. I have written entire posts that define the gospel, such as HERE in this thread specifically titled, "What is the Gospel?" or HERE.
Then there are those who liked the post quoted below. Paul said this Gospel that we preach.

Romans 10:9-13 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, "Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame." For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For "whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."
The word "gospel" does not occur in those verses. Neither is there a sentence in those verses in which Paul refers to the gospel he preached. This is simply one more in a very long list of examples in which you, @Dave, make verses say things they do not actually state.

Believing and being saved is not identical to belief causes salvation, and it most definitely is not the same as the belief of your sinful flesh will cause you salvation. That is not what Acts 16:31 states, and it is not what Acts 16:31 should be made to say.
Here's the quote by Josheb: "Nowhere in the entirety of the Bible does scripture ever state "saved by faith." Nowhere. We are saved by grace through faith for works. We are justified by faith, not saved by faith. BIG difference."
And I stand by that.

I can point to a verse that explicitly states what I posted. In other words, I presented scripture exactly as it is written, without any embellishment or added interpretation. Ephesians 2:8 explicitly states we are saved by grace. The same verse explicitly states we are saved through faith (not by faith). Verse 10 explicitly states we are created in Christ for good works.

You were asked to do the same = provide a verse that explicitly states "saved by faith." Acts 16:31 should be read so that it is consistent with Ephesians 2:8. Save through faith, not saved by faith.
From post # 65 in the thread "Regeneration and born again are not synonymous", page 4.

Here's some more.


Why don't Calvinists believe the Gospel?
Violation of Rules 2.1 and 2.2

Please do not misrepresent my posts again. I am happy to clarify anything I did not make clear.
 
I was challenged by Josheb to provide one verse that claimed 'believe and be saved'. I've been told by him that Romans 10:9-13 is not the Gospel because it was written to believers. I asked Him to share what he thinks the Gospel is, many times, but he won't. Then there are those who liked the post quoted below. Paul said this Gospel that we preach.

Romans 10:9-13 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, "Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame." For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For "whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."

Here's the quote by Josheb


From post # 65 in the thread "Regeneration and born again are not synonymous", page 4.

Here's some more.


Why don't Calvinists believe the Gospel?
I'm a Calvinist, and I believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ...
 
Why don't Calvinists believe the Gospel?
I'm a Calvinist, and I believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ...
I, too, am a Calvinist and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ alive, dead, resurrected and ascendant as King and Lord of all, as the propitiation for our sins.
 
I, too, am a Calvinist and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ alive, dead, resurrected and ascendant as King and Lord of all, as the propitiation for our sins.
The Lowest Common Denominator of the Thread will be; "What's the Gospel?". All Participants here will probably agree with the Fundamentals of the Gospel; to disagree with this, probably crosses the Line and Questions a person's Salvation...

It seems to me, this will be about what Posters Add to the Gospel; or what they take away from the Gospel...
 
Why don't Calvinists believe the Gospel?
That is quite the claim. I would like you to clarify why you think they don't. Your post certainly did not make that clear. You gave the title as being that Calvinists don't believe in the gospel, ended it on the same note. But everything in between seemed to be concerning you dissatisfaction with another individual in some other place, and Calvinist not believing in the gospel or any particulars pertaining to Calvinism, was nowhere found in it.

So, why do you ask why Calvinist don't believe in the gospel?
 
That is NOT what was requested. What I asked for was a verse explicitly reporting an unsaved, unregenerate non-believing person coming to God for salvation in which the scriptures explicitly attribute the cause of his actions to the faculties of his or her sinful flesh.

I never said any such thing. What I did say is the salvation mentioned in Romans 10 is eschatological, not soteriological. What I said was the verses you selectively removed from their stated contexts was written ABOUT believers, not just to believers.
Josh, just so you know, this isn't just for you, this seems to be the consensus here with the main people. This is just as much for Carbon, John, Eleanor, Arial, Hazel, etc. ladodgerfan, etc. makesends who elaborated that same point in post #98 in that same thread, calling it a "By Duck-Duck Go's Auto-Assist:"

Josh said:
"Do not conflate justification with salvation. That is Catholicism. There's not a single place in scripture where we can find "saved by faith" stated."

"That verse was written by a born again, regenerate, saved believer to born again, regenerate, saved believers about the faith of those born again, regenerate, saved believers."

From post 94, same thread.

"No, what it "says" is those to whom the verse was written who already had God-gifted faith in Jesus will be saved. It does not say anyone and everyone who believes in Jesus will be saved and it most definitely does not state faith causes salvation. The "you" in that verse is already saved people. If the verse was reduced to its barest truth it would simply say the saved will be saved. I know that sound redundant to many but once the audience affiliation is established it cannot be denied that Paul is writing to already saved people. The saved to whom he was writing will be saved if they confess Jesus and believe with their heart God raised from the grave."

"Romans 10:9 that if you [the brethren] confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you [the brethren] will be saved. I've already exegeted the text to show it was written to and about Christians, not non-believers. Paul identified his audience at the beginning of the epistle. He identified his audience, those to whom his words applied, throughout the epistle. At the beginning of chapter 10 he again identifies the "you" of his epistle. That "you" is "the brethren.""

"Paul did NOT write, If they confess with their mouth Jesus as Lord and believe in their heart that God raised him from the dead, they will be saved."

"And the "you" in that verse is the brethren, not non-believers. The brethren are already saved from sin. They were not yet saved from either the destruction of Israel in the immensely surrounding persecution of Christians that preceded and followed the flattening of Roman-occupied Israel, or their own death and visit with the grave. If they, the brethren, believed then they, the brethren, would be saved.""

"The fact is our new birth and regeneration is not complete, either 😮. We have not been raised incorruptible and immortal. If 2 Corinthians 5:8 is to be read exactly as written, then they've gone further in their salvation then you or I 😯. They, the OT saints, have been made complete in the Church and, being out of the body, they ae with the Lord."


We are saved through resurrection of Jesus Christ is speaking of both justification and being given a new heart, born again. When we first believe, we are freed/delivered/saved from both the penalty of sin, and the power of sin. What frees us from the power of sin is being born again. That's what raised up with Christ means. All as a result of being placed into Him, the baptism with the Holy Spirit, which is the result of faith. When the Bible speaks of being saved, it's speaking of the penalty of sin, that's justification, and the power of sin, that born again. Then we only need to become what we are already reckoned to be in Christ. To live out what God sees us as in Jesus.

--------

You said in that same post in the same thread


"You can say as many times as you like but ad nauseam does not make anything correct. If you mean the promise of the Holy Spirit is realized in baptism then that is true, but it is not water baptism in which that promise is realized. It is in the baptism of the Holy Spirit that the promise of the Holy Spirit is realized. Apollos and the Acts 19 group of believers proves that fact."

Now this I agree with, though John doesn't. That might be something to build from.

I can point to a verse that explicitly states what I posted. In other words, I presented scripture exactly as it is written, without any embellishment or added interpretation. Ephesians 2:8 explicitly states we are saved by grace. The same verse explicitly states we are saved through faith (not by faith). Verse 10 explicitly states we are created in Christ for good works.

Yes but 'through faith' means faith first, then saved. Thus it's through faith. That's why works is contrasted with faith. It's grace, it's not of works therefore it's not a process, it's an immediate result of being placed into Christ, the baptism, which is a result of faith. In short, 'through faith' in that passage means 'by faith', it's just emphasizing what it's pointing to. Which is exactly what Paul said here.

Romans 10:9-13that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, "Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame." For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For "whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."

And that's the word of faith (Gospel) we preach.

Here, Paul calls it that message the Gospel of peace, and then the Gospel. And faith comes by hearing the Word of God.

14-17 How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach unless they are sent? As it is written: "How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the gospel of peace, Who bring glad tidings of good things!" But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, "Lord, who has believed our report?" So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.

What Paul said in Romans 10:9-13 is the Gospel. You seem to disagree.

Josh
"Paul did NOT write, If they confess with their mouth Jesus as Lord and believe in their heart that God raised him from the dead, they will be saved."
 
Last edited:
Josh, just so you know, this isn't just for you, this seems to be the consensus here with the main people. This is just as much for Carbon, John, Eleanor, Arial, Hazel, etc. ladodgerfan, etc. makesends who elaborated that same point in post #98 in that same thread, calling it a "By Duck-Duck Go's Auto-Assist:"

Josh said:



We are saved through resurrection of Jesus Christ is speaking of both justification and being given a new heart, born again. When we first believe, we are freed/delivered/saved from both the penalty of sin, and the power of sin. What frees us from the power of sin is being born again. That's what raised up with Christ means. All as a result of being placed into Him, the baptism with the Holy Spirit, which is the result of faith. When the Bible speaks of being saved, it's speaking of the penalty of sin, that's justification, and the power of sin, that born again. Then we only need to become what we are already reckoned to be in Christ. To live out what God sees us as in Jesus.

--------

You said in that same post in the same thread




Now this I agree with, though John doesn't. That might be something to build from.



Yes but 'through faith' means faith first, then saved. Thus it's through faith. That's why works is contrasted with faith. It's grace, it's not of works therefore it's not a process, it's an immediate result of being placed into Christ, the baptism, which is a result of faith. In short, 'through faith' in that passage means 'by faith', it's just emphasizing what it's pointing to. Which is exactly what Paul said here.

Romans 10:9-13that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, "Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame." For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For "whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."

And that's the word of faith (Gospel) we preach.

Here, Paul calls it that message the Gospel of peace, and then the Gospel. And faith comes by hearing the Word of God.

14-17 How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach unless they are sent? As it is written: "How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the gospel of peace, Who bring glad tidings of good things!" But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, "Lord, who has believed our report?" So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.

What Paul said in Romans 10:9-13 is the Gospel. You seem to disagree.

Josh
What Paul said in Romans 10:9-13 is the Gospel. You seem to disagree.

Josh
"Paul did NOT write, If they confess with their mouth Jesus as Lord and believe in their heart that God raised him from the dead, they will be saved."
If they confess with their mouth Jesus is Lord and believe in their heart that God raised him from the dead, they will be Saved.

It seems to me that y'all are talking about the Word 'Saved' meaning either 'Born Again' or 'Justified'...

We are saved through resurrection of Jesus Christ is speaking of both justification and being given a new heart, born again.
How can we Believe through a Stoney Heart, to gain a New Heart of Flesh?
 
Last edited:
The Lowest Common Denominator of the Thread will be; "What's the Gospel?". All Participants here will probably agree with the Fundamentals of the Gospel; to disagree with this, probably crosses the Line and Questions a person's Salvation...

It seems to me, this will be about what Posters Add to the Gospel; or what they take away from the Gospel...

If one believes that they are born again before they have faith, then the message 'believe and be saved' is a problem. That's the crux. That's why I asked what must a person believe to be saved, and then what are saved from in that same thread. That didn't go over very well for obvious reasons.
 
If they confess with their mouth Jesus is Lord and believe in their heart that God raised him from the dead, they will be Saved.

It seems to me that y'all are talking about the Word 'Saved' meaning either 'Born Again' or 'Justified'...

Is it possible to have one without the other?
How can we Believe through a Stoney Heart, to gain a New Heart of Flesh?
It only needs to be by the flesh of we set boundaries from tradition.

How about, what is the means, or the power that faith comes by if we are born again as a result of that same faith?
 
If one believes that they are born again before they have faith, then the message 'believe and be saved' is a problem. That's the crux. That's why I asked what must a person believe to be saved, and then what are saved from in that same thread. That didn't go over very well for obvious reasons.
What if 'Believe and be Saved' only means to Believe and be Justified? We're Protestants, right? We believe in Justification through Faith Alone; which IS the moment of Salvation. The moment of the New Birth is not Salvation; Faith is the moment of Salvation...

Why would it matter if Regeneration comes before Faith or after Faith; except for other reasons found in the Bible?
 
Is it possible to have one without the other?

It only needs to be by the flesh of we set boundaries from tradition.

How about, what is the means, or the power that faith comes by if we are born again as a result of that same faith?
Well, Faith DOES comes by Hearing...

But the Ears need to be Circumcised, for the Hearing reaches the heart to Circumcise it...


Either way, Regeneration occurs first...

What's wrong with Prevenient Regeneration? As Christians, all we are doing is battling with "Deuling Verses". My two Verses which speak of Circumcision of the Ear in order to Believe, are as Sharp a Romans 10:9; right?
 
Last edited:
The Lowest Common Denominator of the Thread will be; "What's the Gospel?". All Participants here will probably agree with the Fundamentals of the Gospel; to disagree with this, probably crosses the Line and Questions a person's Salvation...

It seems to me, this will be about what Posters Add to the Gospel; or what they take away from the Gospel...
Yes but the op is a strawman. I did not post what was claimed and the false accusation Calvinists do not believe the gospel is nonsense. AND..... furthermore, not a single verse in that link explicitly states belief causes salvation, nor do any of them attribute salvation or salvific faith to the faculties of the still-sinful unregenerate flesh of the non-believer. Most of those gospel verses were spoken to people already living within a Christological covenant relationship with God. All those epistolary verses are written ABOUT already saved and regenerate believers, not unsaved, unregenerate, non-believers.


So, @Dave,

Is it appropriate to take verses written about the saved and regenerate believer and apply them to unsaved, unregenerate, non-believers?


.
 
Last edited:
Well, Faith DOES comes by Hearing...

But the Ears need to be Circumcised, for the Hearing reaches the heart to Circumcise it...


Either way, Regeneration occurs first...

What's wrong with Prevenient Regeneration? As Christians, all we are doing is battling with "Deuling Verses". My two Verses which speak of Circumcision of the Ear in order to Believe, are as Sharp a Romans 10:9; right?
Getting your ears lowered ~ by ReverendRV * April 22

Acts 7:51 KJV
; Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.

I was having a discussion with a Christian who believes that the Bible teaches our spiritual heart and ears are Circumcised after we believe the Gospel. Christianity teaches that we’re Christians in part because of the Holy Ghost renewing our Hearts, our Minds; and our Ears. This man I was listening to is an Arminian; a Christian who believes we’re Saved from Hell by the Prevenient Grace of God. Grace is Prevenient, all Christians believe this. Arminians teach that because of Total Depravity, none can Hear and understand the Spiritual things of God until Grace first appears and makes a real difference in their Salvation. What’s this difference? It makes us able to ‘Hear’ and understand the Gospel of Jesus Christ, whereas before, it was foolishness to those who are perishing. When someone says our ears are circumcised after we hear and believe the Gospel, this is a Tautology; why would you need your ears ‘re-Circumcised’ afterwards?

If the things of God are Foolishness to you, then you are perishing. Let me put it in a way that maybe it won’t be so foolish. ~ Have you ever told a Lie? Sure; we all have. What do you call people that tell Lies? You say, “Normal”. Normal?? What would you call anyone who Lied to your child to get them into their car? Have you ever Stolen anything, even if it were hardly nothing? What do you call people who Steal? You say, “Survivors”. Survivors?? What would you call someone who stole your child away? Kidnappers are Thieves too; or are they just trying to survive? God wants you to categorize your Sins the same as he categorizes them. These were just two of the Ten Commandments, if God judged you by his standard would you be innocent or guilty? Would you go to Heaven or to Hell? ~ Do you hear and understand?

The Fear of God is the beginning of Wisdom; but not the end of Wisdom. ~ For God so Loved the world he gave his only begotten Son so that whosoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting Life! Jesus Christ is this unique Son of God, and he lived a Holy life as only he could, for the purpose of satisfying God his Father. Jesus trades this satisfaction to all who believe the Gospel, and who will trade their Sinfulness to him for it. He who knew no Sin became Sin on our behalf, so we could become the Righteousness of God; and this caused Jesus to bleed to death on the Cross as punishment for those Sins. We’re Saved by the Prevenient Grace of God through Faith in the Resurrected Savior Jesus Christ, apart from our preforming any stiff-necked Works to try and merit our Forgiveness. Repent of your Sins, Confess Jesus Christ as your Lord God and look for a good Church that teaches the Bible; and loves Lost Souls. ~ When Grace opens our ears, that’s like getting a haircut at the Barber Shop; IE ‘getting our ears lowered’. We need real haircuts over and over again; but we only need our spiritual ears lowered once…

Exodus 33:3 NIV; Go up to the land flowing with milk and honey. But I will not go with you, because you are a stiff-necked people and I might destroy you on the way."
 
Josh, just so you know, this isn't just for you....
I understand that. This is very much about you, but I am not convince you understand that.

It is inappropriate to
  • take verses written about the saved and apply those verse to the saved.
  • take verses written about people living in a covenant relationship with God and apply them to people who deny God's existence.
  • assign causality where scripture assigns none.
  • add to scripture things nowhere stated.
  • claim I said things I never said.
  • attack an entire population of Christians with false accusation(s).
  • sit in the place of God and judge the eternal disposition of others simply because you disagree with them.
What Paul said in Romans 10:9-13 is the Gospel.
No, it is not. The gospel is about Jesus, not humans, and it most definitely is not about unsaved people.

Matthew 4:23
Jesus was going throughout all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every kind of disease and every kind of sickness among the people.

Matthew 9:35
Jesus was going through all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every kind of disease and every kind of sickness.

Matthew 24:14
This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come.

Mark 1:1
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

Mark 1:14-15
Now after John had been taken into custody, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of God, and saying, "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel."

Luke 16:16
The Law and the Prophets were proclaimed until John; since that time the gospel of the kingdom of God has been preached, and everyone is forcing his way into it.

Acts 20:24
But I do not consider my life of any account as dear to myself, so that I may finish my course and the ministry which I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify solemnly of the gospel of the grace of God.

Romans 1:1-6
Paul, a bond-servant of Christ Jesus, called as an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which He promised beforehand through His prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning His Son, who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh, who was declared the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead, according to the Spirit of holiness, Jesus Christ our Lord, through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles for His name's sake, among whom you also are the called of Jesus Christ;

The gospel, the gospel of God, of Christ, of the kingdom, is about what God accomplishes, not what an unregenerate, sin-saturated believer accomplishes turning himself from an object of wrath to an adopted child.
You seem to disagree.
I do. What your ops preach is a gospel of the unregenerate's faculties of the sinful flesh, not the gospel of the kingdom of Christ.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If one believes that they are born again before they have faith, then the message 'believe and be saved' is a problem. That's the crux. That's why I asked what must a person believe to be saved, and then what are saved from in that same thread. That didn't go over very well for obvious reasons.
It is not a problem unless everything a person says, and the order in which they say it, is listing a chronological order. What needs to be done is from scripture determine, first, who God is and what he commanded of man through Adam, then, how great the fall when Adam disobeyed and we all became disobedient sinners; what the fall was from; what the penalty for that fall is (death, but not just death); how completely impossible it is for anyone to do anything that would reconcile himself to God. (The purpose regarding man in God's covenant and plan of redemption, is a people being reconciled to him.)

WHen that is done, we can look at the scriptures that are dealing with believing, salvation, born again. If Jesus says that no one can see or enter the kingdom of God (by being reconciled to him) unless he is born again, that is an order of what has to take place before anything else necessary for this reconciliation can be applied to the person.

In which case when it says believe and be saved it is not a chronological statement. It merely states that if a person believes, they are saved.

There are any number of scriptures that can verify this.

Eph 2 tells us that when were were dead in our sins, like everyone else in the world, God made us alive. What is being made alive in the world but being born? Now, if God made us alive by regeneration (they mean the same thing regardless of what you claim) then with that life comes the faith through which we are saved. This being born again is invisible. We don't know when it was done or even that it was done. We learn that it was done before we believed later, as we ponder the scriptures. Unless we insist that faith caused the new birth, in which case we would remain in that shadowy place of fence sitting and filling scripture with contradictions.

1 Cor 2:14 we learn that a man in his natural state of being dead in his sins cannot accept the things of the Sprit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.

Romans 8:5-10 tells us that our carnal mind is enmity against GOd and is not subject to the law of God and cannot be, because these are the things of the Spirit and without the Spirit they cannot be believed or submitted to.

When a person is born again of the Spirit, they have the Spirit dwelling in them and all the works of Christ are applied to them, and when they hear, they believe. It is not a question of "if" they believe, so the order in which we see it or believe that it took place is beside the point really. We are human. We think in a linear, (past, present, future) way, and speak in a linear way. So, when we determine which is first, faith or regeneration we go by what the Bible tells us. A person who is not born again will not have faith.

As to the question what are we saved from---and I believe your answer was sin----the answer is not sin, but we are saved from the wrath of God by our sins having been paid for on the cross by Jesus.
 
If one believes that they are born again before they have faith, then the message 'believe and be saved' is a problem. That's the crux. That's why I asked what must a person believe to be saved, and then what are saved from in that same thread. That didn't go over very well for obvious reasons.
Would the sentence have a different meaning to you if it read, "be saved and believe"?
 
If one believes that they are born again before they have faith, then the message 'believe and be saved' is a problem. That's the crux.
That is the crux. That is why you were asked if you could provide a verse that explicitly attributes the salvific coming to God in faith the faculties of the sinful flesh. I have asked this of you in every one of the ops you've posted recently and never once received a response.

  • Can you provide use with a verse explicitly assigning such salvific faith to the faculties of the sinfully dead and enslaved flesh?

  • Can you provide us with an example in the Bible of someone coming to Christ salvifically without God already at work in that individual's life specifically for that purpose and in which the scripture explicitly assigns the individual's faith to the faculties of his or her sin-enslaved flesh?


If I were asked the opposite questions, I could provide multiple verses in which the cause is assigned to God and not the sinful flesh. No more inferential readings. Show me something explicitly stated.
 
Back
Top