• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

What is the New Covenant?

It makes all the sense in the world; Grace is always prevenient. For instance, we're Born Again then we Believe on the One who was sent...
Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the Father loves whoever has been born of him. 1 John 5:1.

Amen brother.
 
I might make a slight and insignificant side step on what you say about the covenant of grace. I think that is God with mankind. And the covenant of redemption was within the triune Godhead before the creation of our world and unfolds into the covenant of grace, just as the covenant made with Abraham of faith counted as righteousness unfolded into it. They aren't separate but distinct.

So yes, the covenant of redemption is a covenant with Christ. God would give a people to Him, and He would come as one of us (such unimaginable love and courage and power, such a stepping down to us)and do the work of perfect righteousness for us, then die as our substitute to redeem us and we are His reward and inheritance and glory.

Yes. Faith is gift. And it is a gift given. Not offered.
According to the Covenant of Grace, there are three parties. The party-contractor on heaven's side(God), the party-contractor on man's side (Jesus), and the part contracted and undertaken for (man).
 
the party-contractor on man's side (Jesus),
In this we can see the Federal Headship of Christ and him representing his seed in the Covenant of Grace. @Eleanor

Scripture teaches Jesus was made a surety, This makes Jesus the guarantor of a better covenant. Heb 7:22.

A Surety is a true representative of the party he is Surety of and one person with them in the eye of the law.
Not only is Christ said to have been made sin for us, For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. 2 Cor 5:2, and to have the iniquity of us all laid on him,
All we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned—every one—to his own way;
and the Lord has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.
Isaiah 53:6.
And to have died for us, but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8
But we also are said to be crucified with him, I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. Gal 2:20.
We are made the righteousness of God in him, For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. 2 Cor 5:21.
And will be raised up with him and glorified, and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, Eph 2:6.

Al which necessarily requires this his headship and representation in the covenant.
 
According to the Covenant of Grace, there are three parties. The party-contractor on heaven's side(God), the party-contractor on man's side (Jesus), and the part contracted and undertaken for (man).
Agree completely.
 
What an awesome way of putting it!

Amen.

All I can say is AMEN!
Thanks for that. Isn't it wonderful when we have become so familiar with the Bible, and understand it, not perfectly, but well, so our thoughts can start to untangle something and follow the string to a logical conclusion staying true to the scriptures?
 
Thanks for that. Isn't it wonderful when we have become so familiar with the Bible, and understand it, not perfectly, but well, so our thoughts can start to untangle something and follow the string to a logical conclusion staying true to the scriptures?
It sure is sister. Amen
 
Scripture tells us that God’s dealings with man are determined by agreements called covenants. As an overarching theme, the covenant of grace is significant in the history of redemption.

There are many who will teach, under the New Covenant, "we are given the opportunity" to receive salvation as a free gift. But, if we are given the opportunity, it then becomes a matter of work and is no longer grace.

But only upon the basis of Christ's sacrifice and obedience could man inherit the blessings of the covenant of grace, not by any works he can do. Christ became “the mediator of the new covenant” (Heb. 9:15). Through his work we receive the blessings of salvation.
Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant. Heb 9:15.


There are but two names for the one, second covenant.

To Christ, a covenant of redemption, a bargain of buying and selling because Christ alone engaged to pay the price for redemption. But it is to us a Covenant of grace, in which all is to be had freely. And without respect to any work of ours as the ground of our right thereto. Scripture only mentions two covenants, not three, Gal 4:24, Now this may be interpreted allegorically: these women are two covenants. One is from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery; she is Hagar. Since one of these must be a Covenant of works, a single Covenant off grace must be the other.

There are repeated references to the blood of the Covenant, not Covenants,

How much worse punishment, do you think, will be deserved by the one who has trampled underfoot the Son of God, and has profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has outraged the Spirit of grace? Heb 10:29. This clearly shows that our salvation depends upon only one Covenant, the Covenant of grace.

Also, the condition of the Covenant of grace, properly so called, is "Christ's fulfilling all righteousness" and not as some have maintained, "faith in Christ,"

Yet it was the will of the Lord to crush him;
he has put him to grief;[a]
when his soul makes[b] an offering for guilt,
he shall see his offspring; he shall prolong his days;
the will of the Lord shall prosper in his hand.
11 Out of the anguish of his soul he shall see[c] and be satisfied;
by his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant,
make many to be accounted righteous,
and he shall bear their iniquities.
Isaiah 53:10-11.

But Jesus answered him, “Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.” Then he consented. Matt 3:15.
even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” Matt 20:28.
For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous. Rom 5:19.
For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. 2 Cor 5:21.

And since faith must precede the enjoyment of the promised benefits,
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, Eph 2:8. So it could be a condition or, connection to order, but only in the sense that one thing goes before another in the order of a covenant.

But if it is the misunderstanding that we are given the opportunity to receive salvation by faith (our responsibility to exercise faith), the free Covanant of grace turns into a conditional Covanant of works. This destroys the Gospel.

Or where in scripture does it teach, in the New Covenant does God give man the opportunity to exorcise faith?
Some will teach, God made the Covenant between Him and man, but Scripture does not teach such. But who does scripture say God has made a Covenant with? Psalm 89:3 answers that,


You have said, “I have made a covenant with my chosen one;
I have sworn to David my servant:
Psalm 89:3.

3 You have said, “I have made a covenant with my chosen one;
I have sworn to David my servant:
4 ‘I will establish your offspring forever,
and build your throne for all generations.’”
Psalm 89:3-4.

This is the new building of grace set for us. All believers, when they believe are instantly received, and when they are received, they shall dwell forever in a building of mercy, in which every stone from the bottom to the top, is pure mercy, rich, and free mercy to us.

This plan was all drawn together in eternity in the council of the Trinity. And.....
This was according to the eternal purpose that he has realized in Christ Jesus our Lord, Eph 3:11.

These objects of mercy, the time and place, the way and the means of applying it on them, were designed before the creation of the world.

Of this building, the builder is God Himself. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit,

For we are God's fellow workers. You are God's field, God's building. 1 Cor 3:9.
All the Trinity is at work in the building of it.
The Father chose the objects of mercy, and gave them to the Son to be redeemed; the Son purchased redemption for them; and the Holy Spirit applies the purchased redemption to them.

But all goes to the account of His So, (none to us) 12 And say to him, ‘Thus says the Lord of hosts, “Behold, the man whose name is the Branch: for he shall branch out from his place, and he shall build the temple of the Lord. 13 It is he who shall build the temple of the Lord and shall bear royal honor, and shall sit and rule on his throne. And there[a] shall be a priest on his throne, and the counsel of peace shall be between them both.”’Zech 6:12-13.

Uhhhh, how do we agree with God about a plan from before the foundations of the world?
 
I suppose in the parental sense (they must have had a plan in case something went wrong).
What about Ephesians 1:4? For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love

Whether you place the "in him" before or after the Foundation of the World, God's Choice was before the Foundation of the World; right?

Isn't God's Choice a Plan?
 
What about Ephesians 1:4? For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love

Whether you place the "in him" before or after the Foundation of the World, God's Choice was before the Foundation of the World; right?

Isn't God's Choice a Plan?

Hi back above: the OP said God had an agreement with man, a covenant. I’ve been on situations before where I had no say; it wasn’t an agreement!

Some tidying up to do.
 
Hi back above: the OP said God had an agreement with man, a covenant. I’ve been on situations before where I had no say; it wasn’t an agreement!

Some tidying up to do.
Isn't the Edenic Covenant the first Covenant with God and Man? It's called a Covenant in Hosea 6:7, and named the Edenic Covenant in Theology...
 
Isn't the Edenic Covenant the first Covenant with God and Man? It's called a Covenant in Hosea 6:7, and named the Edenic Covenant in Theology...
Do you see a conflict between the age of the universe and the earth and the creation of them and the life forms that exist? Can you explain what the conflict is between evolution and special creation?
 
Do you see a conflict between the age of the universe and the earth and the creation of them and the life forms that exist? Can you explain what the conflict is between evolution and special creation?
Sorry, I don't think I can explain it...
 
So what side do you lean on then?
I'm not sure this is the right place to discuss it. Sorry for being slow to respond; I was saying this elsewhere...

Well for one thing Heath, Calvinism teaches that God Providentially Governs All things such as hiding the meaning of the Gospel to those people by using Parables. You asked for a Calvinistic explanation. ~ God's Providence is God's Decree in Action. If Jesus says he spoke in Parables to hide the Meaning from some people; as God, that's his Providence, right? We have to remember that Jesus is God, so everything he said and did was his Providence for those with him. HE Providentially hid the Meaning; right?
 
I'm not sure this is the right place to discuss it. Sorry for being slow to respond; I was saying this elsewhere...

Well for one thing Heath, Calvinism teaches that God Providentially Governs All things such as hiding the meaning of the Gospel to those people by using Parables. You asked for a Calvinistic explanation. ~ God's Providence is God's Decree in Action. If Jesus says he spoke in Parables to hide the Meaning from some people; as God, that's his Providence, right? We have to remember that Jesus is God, so everything he said and did was his Providence for those with him. HE Providentially hid the Meaning; right?
Well, all of what you just said has nothing to do with Calvinism in response to my queries. I did not ask for your calvinistic explanation, so I don't know where you got that idea from.
 
Do you see a conflict between the age of the universe and the earth and the creation of them and the life forms that exist? Can you explain what the conflict is between evolution and special creation?

Dave you might want to go to my thread on children’s outreach as ‘east targets’ which has taken up the RCW view of creation . This is where the earth may be older, but not for secular uniformitarian reasons. And the distant universe as well. But our system and biosphere is more recent, per a subtle distinction made by 2P3. ‘Ekpalai’ vs ‘sunestosa.’
 
~
Matt 5:20 . . I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the
Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of
heaven.

Well the thing is: the piety of those two groups was superb and they were greatly
respected in the Israel of that day as primo role models. But their piety was cultural
rather than intrinsic; in other words; their righteousness was produced by training
rather than by nature. In point of fact, they were by nature quite deplorable. (Matt
23:13-33)

John 4:23 . .Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers
will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the
Father seeks.

In other words: God prefers to associate with folks who are righteous by nature
rather than only righteous by compliance with the structure of a religious system:
not even when it's His own God-given system. Compare Isa 1:10-16 wherein God
rejected His people's religious practices, even though their covenant with Him
required those practices, because at the core of their being (a.k.a. their hearts) the
people were unacceptable.
_
 
Back
Top