• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Theology Question For Calvinist/Reformed Members

That is the key to knowing the cause cause of going to the Lake of Fire...

For, if salvation is all about the soul's attitude?
Salvation is not all about the soul's attitude. Since your premise is wrong, the rest is useless.
Then what takes over a soul when grace holds down the sin nature to let the soul decide? EVIL! Not sin.
Satan's fall began with evil in his heart... He rejected God from a perfect state of being. Unlike us, he had no sin nature when he rejected God!

Evil and sin are not the same thing. Jesus did not die for evil. He died for our sins.

Jesus could not die for evil! For it would require that he reject Himself if that were the case..
2 Thessalonians 3:1-2​
Finally, brothers, pray for us that the Lord’s message may spread rapidly
and be honored, just as it was with you, and that we may be delivered
from wicked and evil men, for not all have faith.
Note: It does not say..."sinful men."

No one's sins are sending them to the Lake of Fire.
For Jesus paid for all their sins.
They go to the Lake of Fire because of evil.
For they freely chose (like Satan did) to reject the Lord!
No one is going to the Lake of Fire for their sins!


1 John 2:2
He is the propitiation (atoning sacrifice) for our sins,
and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.

The penalty for all man's sins had been dealt with by God with having Jesus on the Cross!

and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.

God is not simple minded....


........
Correction. The rest of your reasoning is bogus.
 
Salvation is not all about the soul's attitude. Since your premise is wrong, the rest is useless.

Correction. The rest of your reasoning is bogus.


Your boxed in way of thinking must stay put, for it has molded and conformed you to the shape of that box.

In your world?
God really had nothing to save.
So, he created something to be called saved.

I will leave you in your stabilized confusion.
Others here will try to comfort you.... that is your comfort.
 
Your boxed in way of thinking must stay put, for it has molded and conformed you to the shape of that box.

In your world?
God really had nothing to save.
So, he created something to be called saved.

I will leave you in your stabilized confusion.
Others here will try to comfort you.... that is your comfort.
Haha! Well, if I am boxed in, should I tell you that your mindset is disparate and unbalanced? Your statement here makes you seem to see things as wide open to chance —er, possibility— from my POV.

"In your world?"
God created something for no particular reason, and it somehow got out of hand, so he, by great power and wisdom accommodated himself to redeem it —whatever it is?

Meanwhile, my view is open to all sorts of vistas that you apparently are not aware of. The fact that God made this existence for his own purposes and for his own sake opens up life and Scripture becomes food.

As @Arial said, "But I practically disappeared when the notion struck me, except for one who was created by God, for the most magnificent purpose of all, to be given to the very Son of God. All I could do was worship in awe, and I could only glimpse what I was seeing, for the concept was too awesome to stand in."
 
Haha! Well, if I am boxed in, should I tell you that your mindset is disparate and unbalanced? Your statement here makes you seem to see things as wide open to chance —er, possibility— from my POV.

"In your world?"
God created something for no particular reason, and it somehow got out of hand, so he, by great power and wisdom accommodated himself to redeem it —whatever it is?

Meanwhile, my view is open to all sorts of vistas that you apparently are not aware of. The fact that God made this existence for his own purposes and for his own sake opens up life and Scripture becomes food.

As @Arial said, "But I practically disappeared when the notion struck me, except for one who was created by God, for the most magnificent purpose of all, to be given to the very Son of God. All I could do was worship in awe, and I could only glimpse what I was seeing, for the concept was too awesome to stand in."
At least one of us is wasting his time.

Could be you.
Could be me..

The Lord will sort this one out when its the right time.


Wishing you a nice Day.
 
You keep missing the point and use many words to do so. Your response is telling me that you believe you no longer can sin.

It is frankly inexplicable how my response could tell him anything of the sort, because nothing I wrote said anything like that. He inferred what he wanted to see, and that is on him. Implication is on me, inference is on him.

To underline the point I was making, no less than the apostle Paul himself admitted the internal struggle between the old nature (which is being put to death) and the new nature (which is being conformed to the image of the Son), laments his regret when his old nature won out, and thanks God for the victory in Jesus. Paul doesn't pretend that looking to Jesus takes away the struggle.

But that struggle is not between the material body and immaterial soul. As I said previously (and GeneZ cannot refute this), Paul contrasts those in the flesh versus those in the Spirit, the old humanity in Adam versus the new humanity in Christ, the works of the flesh versus the fruit of the Spirit. The Gnostics were wrong—and so is GeneZ.


You teach what you prefer to hear.

This, of course, is laughably false. What I prefer to hear is that humans are basically good, generally speaking, but I believe and teach the complete opposite. I teach not what I prefer to hear but what I believe, and GeneZ has failed to demonstrate any error therein—because he can't, for it is clearly stated thus in Scripture. Again, the struggle is not between the material body and immaterial soul, but rather the works of the flesh versus the fruit of the Spirit.

The Gnostics were wrong—and so is GeneZ.


Pride is the enemy and downfall of the liberal theologian, as well as the legalistic theologian.

Such commentary is not relevant to our discussion and dismissed accordingly.
 
It is frankly inexplicable how my response could tell him anything of the sort, because nothing I wrote said anything like that. He inferred what he wanted to see, and that is on him. Implication is on me, inference is on him.

To underline the point I was making, no less than the apostle Paul himself admitted the internal struggle between the old nature (which is being put to death) and the new nature (which is being conformed to the image of the Son), laments his regret when his old nature won out, and thanks God for the victory in Jesus. Paul doesn't pretend that looking to Jesus takes away the struggle.

But that struggle is not between the material body and immaterial soul. As I said previously (and GeneZ cannot refute this), Paul contrasts those in the flesh versus those in the Spirit, the old humanity in Adam versus the new humanity in Christ, the works of the flesh versus the fruit of the Spirit. The Gnostics were wrong—and so is GeneZ.




This, of course, is laughably false. What I prefer to hear is that humans are basically good, generally speaking, but I believe and teach the complete opposite. I teach not what I prefer to hear but what I believe, and GeneZ has failed to demonstrate any error therein—because he can't, for it is clearly stated thus in Scripture. Again, the struggle is not between the material body and immaterial soul, but rather the works of the flesh versus the fruit of the Spirit.

The Gnostics were wrong—and so is GeneZ.




Such commentary is not relevant to our discussion and dismissed accordingly.
Nice slider..... but no hit.
 
Haha! Well, if I am boxed in, should I tell you that your mindset is disparate and unbalanced? Your statement here makes you seem to see things as wide open to chance —er, possibility— from my POV.
"In your world?"
God created something for no particular reason, and it somehow got out of hand, so he, by great power and wisdom accommodated himself to redeem it —whatever it is?
Meanwhile, my view is open to all sorts of vistas that you apparently are not aware of. The fact that God made this existence for his own purposes and for his own sake opens up life and Scripture becomes food.
As @Arial said, "But I practically disappeared when the notion struck me, except for one who was created by God, for the most magnificent purpose of all, to be given to the very Son of God. All I could do was worship in awe, and I could only glimpse what I was seeing, for the concept was too awesome to stand in."
I see God's whole purpose in creation to be his glory through the glory of the Son in preparing a bride for him.
 
Are the elect created to belong to Christ and is the choosing that God does choosing to create those specific persons for Christ, for His glory, and as His inheritance? That would certainly change one's perspective from redemption being man centered to being God centered. I have been trying to work through this to see if it is compatible with the things that we do know doctrinally and keep hitting possible snags---and then my mind wanders off to other things less taxing. ;) I do not want to lean on my own understanding and call it good. And I don't want to singularly arrive at a doctrine and consider it truth.

I am asking for help in working through this, from fellow Reformed, well versed in scripture, theology, and doctrine, of which there are many on this forum.
Sounds like the debate between supralapsarian and infralapsarian controversy.

This is what I know:

God commanded Moses to build an [earthly] Tabernacle and pattern it according to the Heavenly Tabernacle.

So, now we have the revelation of a Heavenly Tabernacle. So, let's look at what transpired in the Heavenly Tabernacle.

1. A Redeemer was foreordained before the creation of heaven, earth, and man.
18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,
1 Pe 1:18–20.

2. This Redeemer is loved by the Father who sent Him to the people foreordained and chosen to be redeem.
24 Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world. Jn 17:23–24.

3. This Redeemer will often suffer in the discharging of His mission to redeem this foreordained and chosen people named in this "charter."
26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. Heb 9:26.

4. A "book" or unwritten "charter" was determined that included names of a people the Redeemer was sent to redeem.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. 9 If any man have an ear, let him hear. Rev. 13:7–9.

5. As the Redeemer discharges His mission, He will say things that have been kept secret since the beginning but enough upon which those He came to redeem may identify Him as Redeemer and His particular mission to redeem the people named in the "charter."
35 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world. Mt 13:35.

6. A kingdom was prepared for a people to inhabit it.
34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: Mt 25:34.

7. A people were foreordained and chosen to inhabit this kingdom.
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Eph 1:3–4.

8. Messengers sent from God would be killed in the presenting of varying messages to this foreordained and chosen people named in the "charter."
50 That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation; Lk 11:49–50.

9. Everything revealed concerning this Redeemer, His mission, and the redeemed were all completed "It is finished" in eternity before God created heaven, earth, and man.
3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. Heb 4:2–3.

From my understanding of Scripture God in eternity deemed a people in Himself (which is where His foreknowledge of us rests), but by virtue to "blowing" this deemed and chosen people into the nostrils of the man and into his loins this people became "lost" in the sense that we are no longer IN God but "outside" Him and the best He can do for us in this existence is dwell IN us as down payment until the end and we are again restored back into God from whence we were first contemplated. So now God must now RE-deem us from this existence in time and translate us into eternity which is what happens the moment we die.

Does this answer your initial question?
 
Creates "all fact?" :unsure:

Did God create all the names Adam chose to give the animals that God brought his way?
Yes he inspired them all. All names having a spiritual meaning assigned by God the one author

In that way they are used as ceremonial shadows to the unbelieving world as them not revealed the mystery of faith.

The shadows all spoke of the suffering of Christ beforehand and the glory that did follow the cross, and first cetury reformation. We can look back to the work of the Spirt of Christ faith by the dame faith of Christ by which they looked ahead

Not all Israel is born agin Israel It would seem he divorced the one that worshiped shadows.

1 Peter 1:8_11 Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory: Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls. Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.
 
Back
Top