ReverendRV
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2023
- Messages
- 2,109
- Reaction score
- 788
- Points
- 113
I guess all I would ask, is for everyone to agree that a Christian who holds to the Law is the Weaker Brother. At the Council of Jerusalem, the Pharisees would have been the Weaker Brothers for wanting Circumcision; Saint Peter was the Stronger Brother for wanting Sola Fide...The Christian who won't eat food offered to idols----and this must be placed in its historical context as to who Paul is writing to and it placement in history--- has simply not yet learned the things that more mature Christians have learned. It bothers his conscience to eat what was offered to idols because he is still spiritually attached to the Sinai Covenant restrictions. Remember too, that Jews were surrounded by pagan idol worship at the time. It is because of the second commandment (they would most likely be Jews or Gentiles who had previously converted to Judaism. But the abstaining, since it was not condemned by Paul, would not have been because they were adding to faith as something necessary for salvation, but because of conscience.
Same with keeping the Sabbath. If it is being used as a means of salvation in addition to faith in Christ, then it is misguided as to and understanding of what the Sabbath rest was all about when God rested on the seventh day from his work and then established a seventh day rest for Israel. As a memorial. What day of the week it is does not matter. Even the day on which the church gathers before God, is a memorial of Christ's fulfilling the the true day of rest. For believers now, as having entered that rest in Christ and the future fulfillment of God's work of redemption completed.
So no we are not antinomians if we eat food sacrificed to idols or if we do not follow the Sabbath commands (and there were many Sabbaths, not just one day of the week) given to Israel.
Last edited: