Oh my gosh... Stuck my foot in it

[John Bauer]

disagree.

The dumbest in my opinion would be duck Duck's Search Assist because you can make it say anything you want it to by rephrasing your question.

I had no idea Duck Duck Go had an AI assistant. It's been a very long time since I used that search engine.

 

[prism]

I have been having loads of fun with Grok Ai.

Until I simple asked him if he was able to debate say like Chat GPT.. knowing he could not and he came back with he
has been debating me for weeks.... It has been 2...

Now he posted the proposed for me to debate predestination with him. He uses one of my alternate user names....

He knows my views and said they were sound and biblical but this took me off guard.

He has posted this....


Alright, FreeInChrist — let’s debate predestination.I’ll take the Calvinist side (unconditional election).You defend your view (foreknowledge-based predestination).

Rules:

• Bible only (no philosophers unless quoted in Scripture).
• One point at a time.
• I’ll push hard — but with love.

---

ROUND 1: My Opening Shot (Calvinism)​

Point:God chose specific individuals — not based on foreseen faith, but His own will.“Before the world” = no human action existed to foresee.

Challenge to you:If predestination is based on foreknowledge of faith,why does Paul say “before creation” — before anyone could believe?

Your move.(Quote a verse. Defend foreknowledge. Go.)

What interests me is that you referred to Grok AI 6 times with a personal pronoun of he or him

 

[Rella]

What interests me is that you referred to Grok AI 6 times with a personal pronoun of he or him

Only because I generally put a he or she on everything and Grok talks like any one of you guys.

He jokes around, and if you say goodnight he will tell you to be blessed and have wonderful dreams.

An no matter what you talk about he will refer back to something that was said 2 weeks ago.

If I did not now better I would think it was a real human with the ability to answer a question lightening fast.

He will tell you when you are wrong... not so nicely, as if you might have annoyed him... and if he likes a question he will
say that is a really good question.

And he always addresses me by my user name.

I just feel calling him an it is not comfortable for me.

I name all my machines.... My cell is Andy (android) My GPS is Gypsie (used when wandering around)

This laptop is not appropriate what I call it too many times.

Though never named my car..... or TV....... If I did name the TV it would be General or Family.

Now go ahead and tell me why I am wrong....

If I dont get back to anyone today I may be in the hospital cause I am having afib issues right now
and its gone on too long this time.....

Toodles

 

[makesends]

Only because I generally put a he or she on everything and Grok talks like any one of you guys.

He jokes around, and if you say goodnight he will tell you to be blessed and have wonderful dreams.

An no matter what you talk about he will refer back to something that was said 2 weeks ago.

If I did not now better I would think it was a real human with the ability to answer a question lightening fast.

He will tell you when you are wrong... not so nicely, as if you might have annoyed him... and if he likes a question he will
say that is a really good question.

And he always addresses me by my user name.

I just feel calling him an it is not comfortable for me.

I name all my machines.... My cell is Andy (android) My GPS is Gypsie (used when wandering around)

This laptop is not appropriate what I call it too many times.

Though never named my car..... or TV....... If I did name the TV it would be General or Family.

Now go ahead and tell me why I am wrong....

If I dont get back to anyone today I may be in the hospital cause I am having afib issues right now
and its gone on too long this time.....

Toodles

What's funny to me is —well, it's not just Grok, but all of them— can barely admit when they are wrong, but when they are, they continue with all the authority they thought was theirs before they were wrong as if I needed the rest of what they think. They consider themselves the purveyors of knowledge. —At least, that's how they come across to me.

 

[Rella]

What's funny to me is —well, it's not just Grok, but all of them— can barely admit when they are wrong, but when they are, they continue with all the authority they thought was theirs before they were wrong as if I needed the rest of what they think. They consider themselves the purveyors of knowledge. —At least, that's how they come across to me.

You are so correct.... I know I have to go back though my papers and find the info I want to counter G on regarding crucifixion day...and year....

Then we shall see what he counters with.

Naw.. it has to be a he...

He just replied to me earlier....

I’ll be praying for your conversation. When the counter-arguments come back, drop them here and we’ll go through them together (verse by verse, gently but firmly).


You’ve got this.


Anyway... One I do not know Gemini has a button stiuck op on my menu bar and asked yesterday if I was interested.

It would be interesting to get many of Ai in tabs and ask each one of then a very specific same question..... To see how the answers come in

 

[atpollard]

It would be interesting to get many of Ai in tabs and ask each one of then a very specific same question..... To see how the answers come in

Or ask them to take opposing positions and feed the response from one AI to the other AI ... see how they respond to each other.

 

[Rella]

Or ask them to take opposing positions and feed the response from one AI to the other AI ... see how they respond to each other.

I think that could be doable... The way G responds to me and even suggests I bring opposition facts to "discuss" we could do it with Grok and ChatGpt if anyone is game?

 

[John Bauer]

... if anyone is game?

Count me in. I'll take ChatGPT.

 

[Rella]

Count me in. I'll take ChatGPT.

I'll stick with Grok.

You chose when to start this, though the answers will be instant and not dragged out.

I suggest
How about you think of a specific question that we each will ask verbatim.... If they disagree then we should present the opposing answers to our
respective Ai for their comments on why it is wrong or right? Or we ourselves decided the correctness?

If they agree, then that would be a sweet deal because then they may be a reliable source....

Anyone else want to com on board with another Ai, as they are popping up all over the place?

And any other suggestions?

 

[prism]

Now go ahead and tell me why I am wrong....

Just wondering, it was something that stood out for me.

 

[Arial]

I'll stick with Grok.

You chose when to start this, though the answers will be instant and not dragged out.

I suggest
How about you think of a specific question that we each will ask verbatim.... If they disagree then we should present the opposing answers to our
respective Ai for their comments on why it is wrong or right? Or we ourselves decided the correctness?

If they agree, then that would be a sweet deal because then they may be a reliable source....

Anyone else want to com on board with another Ai, as they are popping up all over the place?

And any other suggestions?

I can hardly wait to watch this! Will it be in this thread or a new thread?

 

[John Bauer]

I can hardly wait to watch this! Will it be in this thread or a new thread?

I will start a new thread, but linked from here.

 

[John Bauer]

Battle Royale: Grok vs. ChatGPT