That is a man-introduced construct that has no biblical basis and no biological basis.
What man is it that introduced the construct? What is your construct? (I.e. what is the truth of the matter?) Who created what we know as biology? Does the one who created it also have complete dominion over it to do as He pleases? Is there anything within our knowledge of the various sciences that says it is possible for the sun and moon to stand still for a day?
Is it biologically possible for a man dead and in the grave, wrapped head to toe in grave clothes as was the custom, stinking of decomposition, to come walking out of the grave?
So many question arise from your statement and not a one of them explained biologically.
Another construct that has no biblical basis. That reeks the fallacy of traducianism.
How so?
In
Christian theology,
traducianism is a doctrine about the origin of the
soul holding that this
immaterial aspect is transmitted through natural generation along with the body, the material aspect of human beings. That is, human propagation is of the whole being, both material and immaterial aspects: an individual's soul is derived from the soul of one or both parents. This implies that only the soul of
Adam was created directly by
God (with
Eve's substance, material and immaterial, being taken from out of Adam), in contrast with the idea of
creationism of the soul, which holds that all souls are created directly by God.
[1
I said nothing of the soul, but was speaking of nature.
Human nature
Human nature comprises the fundamental dispositions and characteristics—including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—that humans are said to have naturally. The term is often used to denote the essence of humankind, or what it 'means' to be human.
It is the Bible---therefore God---who repeatedly tells us that sin came into the world through one
man. It compares "in Christ" with "in Adam." You of course can choose to interpret that anyway you choose. I prefer to take it at face value, considering empirical evidence, and evidence within the whole of Scripture. Even though there is a great deal of faith involved in doing so, (actually believing what God says even though I do not understand the hows and whys of a thing and it does not fit into earthly wisdom and knowledge.) IOW I never try to explain or understand God on a horizontal basis, but let Him speak for Himself, and believe what He says.
There was something so different about the birth of Jesus that it can only be super-natural. An act of God. He had a human mother like all of humanity does. But He did not have a human father, as we do. Scripture tells us God was the one who fathered Him. Such a thing had never happened before and never will again.