@mikewringer

[Carbon]

MacArthur was not a dispensationalist IMO but the following would explain his position more clearly.

start at 18:05

Aside: a lot of good questions/answers on this clip

I disagree, brother. I believe he was a dispensationalist, and I also believe there was evidence of it besides him even admitting it, even though he claimed he was a leaky one. He also believed and taught that Amillennialism is replacement theology (supersessionism). The most amazing thing many Calvinists found puzzling ( I may have used the wrong words here) was his soteriology, which was Calvinistic, which does not mix well with the dispensationalist hermeneutic. You remember his statement? Why every self-respecting Calvinist is a premillennialist