What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?
He didn't, as I've already explained. Please stop baiting.
That is not an answer to the question asked and no one is being baited.
I've come to the conclusion that you are impossible to have a rational discussion with. Have a nice day.
Dave
I am not the one refusing to answer very valid, simple, readily and easily answered questions. I am not the one posting irrationally or the one obstructing the conversation. Show us you know how to have a rational discussion by answering valid and relevant questions. Do it without trying to make me out to be the bad guy.
The answer to the question, "
What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?" is,
Jesus would have become a sinner!
Next question:
What would have happened when Jesus became a sinner?
Give this post
HERE a read. It will provide some very important information relevant to MacArthur's comments and this conversation I am attempting to have with you about how and why Jesus
cannot violate Exodus 20:12 (or any other of his Father's commands). If the article is read a simple, "
I agree" will end this line of conversation and bring us back to MacArthur's statements
where they can then be discussed with an agreed upon metric. If, on the other hand, Christ's impeccability is disputed then you'll understand my position, perhaps be able to anticipate my next few posts and we can, again, discuss MacArthur's comments with a shared understanding of my position
even if you disagree with me. The question(s) I've asked is valid. It's op-relevant. It's a rational inquiry and I am not baiting you.
What would have happened when Jesus became a sinner?
.
.