• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

How Important Was Mary?

can you give a jest of what the video says.
I know the sermons posted are usually an hour, but this particular video is only six minutes long. It says that the idea that Jesus finds answering His biological mothers prayers irresistible does not come from the Bible.
 
Last edited:
I know the sermons posted are usually an hour, but this particular video is only six minutes long. It says that the idea that Jesus finds that answering His biological mothers prayers irresistible does not come from the Bible.
I see it this way

God is omnipresent. where I go God is, God is omniscient, He knows all things, God is omnipotent. He can do all things.

Since God is with me, as well as my brother in england, God can hear us both at the same time when we pray

Mary is non of these.

So even the thought Mary can hear me here in Ohio is.. well.. I mean,,

Then to claim she can also hear a brother on the other side of the world?

That would make her equal to God. Not even satan has that power. and he is spirit
 
What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?
That would seem, at least, to present the possibility of sin.
Hmmm.... why are you equivocating. Why are you not being forthcoming with the answer you know to be true and correct? If Jesus violated Exodus 20:12 that would not be a "probability" of sin. It would be sin. Sin is lawlessness (1 Jn. 3:4). Furthermore, whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of the Law (Jms. 2:10).

So, I ask again,

What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?


.
 
What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?

Hmmm.... why are you equivocating. Why are you not being forthcoming with the answer you know to be true and correct? If Jesus violated Exodus 20:12 that would not be a "probability" of sin. It would be sin. Sin is lawlessness (1 Jn. 3:4). Furthermore, whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of the Law (Jms. 2:10).

So, I ask again,

What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?
He didn't, as I've already explained. Please stop baiting. I've come to the conclusion that you are impossible to have a rational discussion with. Have a nice day.

Dave
 
Last edited:
What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?
He didn't, as I've already explained. Please stop baiting.
That is not an answer to the question asked and no one is being baited.
I've come to the conclusion that you are impossible to have a rational discussion with. Have a nice day.

Dave
I am not the one refusing to answer very valid, simple, readily and easily answered questions. I am not the one posting irrationally or the one obstructing the conversation. Show us you know how to have a rational discussion by answering valid and relevant questions. Do it without trying to make me out to be the bad guy.

The answer to the question, "What would have happened if Jesus did violate Exodus 20:12?" is, Jesus would have become a sinner!


Next question: What would have happened when Jesus became a sinner?


Give this post HERE a read. It will provide some very important information relevant to MacArthur's comments and this conversation I am attempting to have with you about how and why Jesus cannot violate Exodus 20:12 (or any other of his Father's commands). If the article is read a simple, "I agree" will end this line of conversation and bring us back to MacArthur's statements where they can then be discussed with an agreed upon metric. If, on the other hand, Christ's impeccability is disputed then you'll understand my position, perhaps be able to anticipate my next few posts and we can, again, discuss MacArthur's comments with a shared understanding of my position even if you disagree with me. The question(s) I've asked is valid. It's op-relevant. It's a rational inquiry and I am not baiting you.


What would have happened when Jesus became a sinner?


.
.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top