If you'd teach it to me, I'd be glad to hear it.
I did. I provided a link explaining UE and you're now pretending that did not happen and further pretending you don't know what was stated in that link.
You've really never heard of OSAS?
OSAS does not teach "unconditional eternal salvation." If you think that is what OSAS teaches then you are wrong, in need of more study and better learning, have been arguing straw men, and all the criticisms built on the misunderstanding are abusive to those who know the doctrine(s) correctly.
No. If I've been disrespectful, then show me reasonably how, and I can do better.
Baseless criticism, red herrings, straw men, and feigned ignorance are ALL disrespectful.
Otherwise, I'm talking only about unconditional eternal salvation, which you haven't ever heard of.
I haven't heard of it and you have yet to prove it exists. So far what the posts show is that you have
wrongly mixed-up UE and OSAS with "unconditional eternal salvation AND refused to heed the information provided showing they are not identical.
- NO ONE teach unconditional eternal salvation.
- You have yet to prove anyone does so.
- Arguing things that do not exist as if they do exist is a red herring
- Unconditional Election is not identical to unconditional eternal salvation.
- The doctrine colloquially called "Once Saved Always Saved" is also not identical to unconditional eternal salvation.
- Arguing UE and/or OSAS as identical or synonymous with unconditional eternal salvation is a straw man.
- People who criticize others based on red herrings and straw men and repeatedly refuse to evidence their claims are self-evidently prima facie disrespectful, and when they do so knowingly that qualifies as deceit.
Stop being lazy and prove someone actually believes in a thing called "
unconditional eternal salvation."
Or
In the absence of an inability to prove that claim please have the respect, courtesy, and honesty to be forthcoming and honest and state, "
I do not have any proof anyone actually teaches a thing called 'unconditional eternal salvation'."
Respect yourself by being honest. Respect everyone else by being
forthcoming. Once you have either provided
proof someone actually teaches eternal salvation is completely unconditional, I'll take up that matter and that source. Alternatively, once you've acknowledged there is no such proof, I will ask you a few questions and provide you with some basics pertaining to grace as the scriptures assert it
because I completely and wholeheartedly agree with you that
grace is power not to sin, help in times of temptation NOT to sin. That half of the op is correct. The rest is red herrings and straw men and you do not appear to understand that.
I can help you understand better so these mistakes do not recur and, if you'll let me, I'd like to try.
1 John 3:6
No one who remains in him sins continually; no one who sins continually has seen him or knows him.
It's time to stop the red herrings, straw men, conflation, and baseless claims. Do NOT repeat the above mistakes again. Obey God. Either prove someone actually teaches unconditional eternal salvation or confess the lack. Turn this op into something useful so the lurkers might benefit.