I will check it out, I've never read Van Til...
On Clubhouse, they bring up Presupositional Apologetics a lot. A regular Atheist speaker objects to Presuppositionalism, but he will agree with me that everyone has presuppositions. To me, the argument is over at this point; why argue against using sound Presuppositions to build upon, when he thinks his presupposition is Sound?
People are instinctively Religious Creatures, this is apparent just by looking around the world. Why are there so many Religions around the world? Atheism hasn't made a Dent, and hardly scratches the surface of Theism. Accepting what I just said, is not a Presupposition; but there is a Presupposition that can be launched from what I just said. Here is the Presupposition; Atheists Suppress the truth in Unrighteousness. The Atheist says he has Presuppositions too. Atheists presuppose there is no God; but the Lord may be around the LAST corner...
Therefore, Presuppositional Apologetics support that the Fool has said in his heart there is no God; they have Suppressed the truth of Human Nature in Unrighteousness. This supports the Veracity of the Bible...
@Arial @Alive
Homo Religiosus? - January 2018
www.cambridge.org