Christ's Law

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:15 . . But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister
is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.

In this situation, Christians are neither required, nor encouraged, nor under even
the slightest obligation to attempt reconciliation; rather, "let him depart" strictly
forbids getting back together with the unbeliever.

The unbeliever's departure is a golden opportunity, to permanently escape a
difficult situation that Christ's followers would be foolish to let slip through their
fingers.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:17 . . But as God hath distributed to every man, as The Lord hath called
every one, so let him walk.

"distribution" is likely talking about spiritual gifts. All of Christ's believing followers
are supposed to have at least one.

"Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. And there are differences of
administrations, but the same Lord. And there are diversities of operations, but it is
the same God which worketh all in all. But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to
every man to profit withal. For to one is given by the Spirit, yada, yada, yada."
(1Cor 12:5-8)

The "call" likely includes the venue where each individual's gift is put to good use
for The Lord. I don't think we need to worry about how to find that venue; it'll find
us. Thing is, stay in your own zone; don't crash somebody else's party and/or stick
your nose into something that's none of your spiritual business, and quite possibly
out of your spiritual depth too.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:18a . . Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become
uncircumcised.

It was of course impossible to literally reverse circumcision in Paul's day. However,
there did exist a procedure to ceremoniously reverse it. (cf. 1Maccabees 1:15)

"Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised." (1Cor 7:18b)

The circumcision in question is ritual circumcision; specifically the initiation rite into
Judaism.

Paul's advice is very practical because when men undergo Judaism's circumcision
rite, they obligate themselves to comply with the covenant that Moses' people
agreed upon with God on oath per Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.

As a result; they put themselves in danger of God slamming them with the curses
for noncompliance listed at Lev 26:3-38, Deut 27:15-26, and Deut 28:1-69.
(cf. Gal 3:10)

All one has to do is research the last 3,500 years of the Jews' history, up to and
including the Holocaust, to see for themselves that God is serious about those
curses.

FAQ: If 1Cor 7:18b is a hard and fast rule, then why did Paul circumcise Timothy at
Acts 16:1-3?

REPLY: The procedure wasn't done to initiate Timothy into Judaism, but rather, so
that the Jews wouldn't make an issue of Paul associating with an uncircumcised
Gentile which, in their minds, would effectively invalidate his message.

A similar problem exists today among Christians fixated on a particular translation
of the Bible. They will not listen to a teacher, not even a Spirit empowered teacher,
unless he quotes from their favorite version. In their minds; all who use any other
version are heretics right from the get-go.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:20 . . Each one should remain in the situation which he was in when God
called him.

I once knew a really good Christian man who felt guilty never going out as a
missionary to a foreign land to help people less fortunate than himself. Well, I
assured him that somebody has to stay back here in the States and hold down a
job in order to earn the money needed to finance missions already in place.

The ratio of soldiers in the rear compared to the ones at the front is something like
six to one. It takes a massive support base to keep our guys on the line out there
facing off with the other guys; all the way from workers in state-side factories
manufacturing war materiel, to the sailors, soldiers, and airmen moving men and
materiel over land and seas, to the doctors and nurses staffing MASH facilities, to
the guys and girls driving supply trucks to the front. We can't all be in the bush.
Somebody has to be in the rear with the gear.

So take comfort in knowing that if you're involved in the effort, then you're a part
of the effort; and will be rewarded accordingly. (cf. 1Sam 30:1-25 and Matt 20:1-16)
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:21-22 . . Were you called while a slave? Do not be concerned about it; but
if you can be made free, rather use it. For he who is called in The Lord while a slave
is The Lord's freedman. Likewise he who is called while free is Christ's slave.

Were this the only life, then slavery would be a terrible fate because there would be
nothing better to look forward to; viz: Christian slaves should think of their
situation as only a temporary set-back. They're missing out on the best that life has
to offer for now, but I'm pretty sure they can look forward to Christ making it up to
them in the next life.

The situation of Christians behind bars, without possibility of either release or
parole, is little different than that of slaves. However, though their time inside may
be for life, it isn't permanent. No, their time inside is just a bump in the road: it's
not the end of the road.

As I was watching a prison documentary on NetFlix some time ago, one of the
inmates interviewed-- an elderly man sweeping with a broom out in the yard --said,
in so many words: Guys come in here thinking their life is over. It ain't over, it's
just different.

That old guy was a lifer, but he was at peace with his situation-- an amazing
attitude for an institutionalized man with no hope of ever again having a normal life
on the outside.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:23 . .You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of men.

In other words; selling your body is one thing, while selling your soul is quite
another; Christ has first dibs on that so don't even think about it.

The point is; whether bonded or free, every believer is indentured to The Lord. But
it is his wish that believers remain free rather than make a habit of indenturing
themselves to humans primarily because a free man's labor earns him wages: a
portion of which can be donated towards The Lord's work; while a slave earns no
wages to donate towards anything. Also; a free man is at liberty to move about and
make himself useful to The Lord, while a slave's movements are pretty much
limited to their human master's whims.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:24 . . Brethren, let each one remain with God in the situation in which he
was called.

If you're a slave; don't become a runaway slave. If you're a secretary, don't quit
your job and/or abandon your husband to run off and become another Joan of Arc.
Stay put; always keeping in mind that whether slave, free, or crusader; will make
no difference in your association with God.

NOTE: Ambitious Christians sometimes feel as though they are not being utilized by
God to their fullest potential, i.e. they could be doing more. Well; it just might be
that in His opinion you're doing enough, and more is a nice thought, but
unnecessary.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:25 . . Now about virgins: I have no command from The Lord, but I give a
judgment as one who by The Lord's mercy is trustworthy.

The Greek word for "virgins" is parthenos (par-then'-os) which basically refers to
maidens and/or unmarried daughters.

There's an ancient temple in Greece called the Parthenon; which was at one time a
sort of shrine to the goddess Athena (a.k.a. Minerva). Apparently it was common
for Athena's followers to donate their young girls to her service.

I'm guessing that the Christians in ancient Corinth, influenced by Greek and Roman
culture, were curious whether they were supposed to donate their young girls to
Christ's service; viz: make nuns of them; which of course would seal them into
celibacy and thus preclude the possibility of ever having a man and a family of their
own.

Paul's claim to be "trustworthy" is saying that he could be relied upon to speak as
Christ, and for Christ, on certain issues without having to first inquire the Lord's mind
about them.

That's a pretty advanced degree of inspiration when somebody is 110% confident
that their thoughts on a matter are Christ's thoughts.

Too many Christians are wishy-washy. They have an annoying habit of pontificating
their opinions as the God's truth when, in reality, they have neither the authority
nor the confidence to stand up and announce themselves trustworthy, i.e. infallible.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:26-28 . . Because of the present crisis, I think that it is good for you to
remain as you are. Are you married? Do not seek a divorce. Are you unmarried? Do
not look for a wife. But if you do marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin
marries, she has not sinned.

The "present crisis" probably relates to circumstances that make it difficult and/or
inadvisable to settle down and raise a family, e.g. Jer 16:1-4 and Matt 24:19-22.

However, marriage, overall, doesn't displease God; and best of all, the Corinthian
Christians didn't have to donate their maidens to Christ as nuns; rather, the girls
were perfectly at liberty to settle down with a man.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:36 . . If anyone thinks he is acting improperly toward the virgin he is
engaged to, and if she is getting along in years and he feels he ought to marry, he
should do as he wants. He is not sinning. They should get married.

We have a saying in America that goes like this: So and so married what's her
name and made a decent woman out of her. Well, most grown-ups know what that
means without me having to say so. The point is: if a Christian man finds himself
on the brink of exceeding the limits of propriety with his best girl; it's time to either
break up or tie the knot.

And then too there's the so-called biological clock that stalks women during their
productive years. It's cruel, unthinkable, and utterly selfish and psychopathic of a
man to keep a girl on hold during those years if and when he's fully aware that
she's longing to settle down and have a family of her own. A man who does that
has no clue as the meaning of words like love and honor.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 7:39 . . A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her
husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, but he must be in The Lord.

When people sound-bite a verse like that one out of context, they run the risk of
coming to some very false conclusions; and one of those is that Christians can
never, under any circumstances, divorce and remarry while their spouses are alive.
Well, obviously they can, under certain conditions. (e.g. Matt 5:32) In other words:
an unfaithful husband is a dead husband, i.e. he's reckoned deceased.

However, a Christian ex-wife has to be careful not to re-marry outside her faith as
that would be like jumping from the frying pan into the fire. (cf. 2Cor 6:14-18)
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 8:4-13

Putting this into a modern context: In my State of Oregon, we have tavern-style
restaurants; viz: a section of the tavern is a bar, and another section is dedicated
to dining. The bar sections usually host State-sanctioned gambling machines and
typically off-limits to minors.

Suppose you have Christian friends who sincerely feel it's wrong to dine in a
tavern-style restaurant because of the alcohol and the gambling. Though you
yourself might be comfortable in your own mind that there is no sin in dining at
taverns, your friends are not so sure. So if you were to take them to a tavern, they
would be committing sin in compromising their conscience; and you would be
committing sin by knowingly leading them into a situation that causes them to
make that compromise. (Rom 15:1-2)

Another pertinent example is Hooters; where the waitresses are cute buxom girls
filled out in all the right places clothed in short shorts, and clingy tops; so that the
situation is a double whammy of babes and alcohol. Supposing your Christian
buddy sincerely feels it's wrong for Christian men to dine at Hooters? Then you
would be wrong in taking him there for a burger even if you were convinced in your
own mind there is nothing wrong with Hooters because you would be leading your
Christian buddy into a situation that causes him to feel guilty and/or less of himself.

The Bible says that Christians should accommodate others to their edification
(edification means to build someone up as opposed to tearing them down), Well,
when we please ourselves to their detriment; that's very bad. Some guys feel that
cute buxom girls and yummy gams are a God-send, while other guys regard them
as the Devil in disguise. The correct route here is to accommodate the more
sensitive conscience. (Rom 14:3-4)

Self defense is another gray area. Some Christians sincerely believe they should
"turn the other cheek" in every situation, even criminal situations; while others
believe it is permissible to use as much force and violence as is necessary to
prevent the commission of a felony-- even lethal force and violence. Let each
individual be fully persuaded in their own mind rather than someone else's mind.
(Rom 14:5)
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 9:13-14 . . Don't you know that those who work in the Temple get their food
from the Temple, and those who serve at the altar share in what is offered on the
altar? In the same way: The Lord has commanded that those who preach the
gospel should receive their living from the gospel.

The covenant that Moses' people agreed upon with God in the Old Testament
doesn't allow Levitical priests to own land where they can provide themselves
sustenance by working their own farms and ranches. It's God's decree that a
number of the sacrifices and offerings that the priesthood's constituents bring are
dedicated to not just sustaining a friendly association with God, but also to
nourishing His servants. (e.g. Ex 29:31-32, Lev 2:1-10, Lev 7:11-15)

Obviously then, 1Cor 9:13-14 is saying that Christian congregations ought to pitch
in and help provide their churches' full-time Pastor with a decent standard of living.
This is not optional; no, it's something that "The Lord has commanded."

* Though pastors may not always preach the gospel, many are at least capable of
doing so. Of course pastors who never preach the gospel should be required to
maybe go out and get a job somewhere and support themselves rather than
depending upon a congregation to take care of them.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 9:24-25 . . Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one
gets the prize? Run in such a way as to get the prize. Everyone who competes in
the games goes into strict training. They do it to get a crown that will not last; but
we do it to get a crown that will last forever.

The prize that Olympians won back in those days wasn't much. No medals: just a
simple garland for the head consisting of a wreath made with wild olive leaves from
a sacred tree near the temple of Zeus at Olympia. In time the leaves dried out and
crumbled.

The important thing to note about 1Cor 9:24-25 is that the prize isn't a pass into
the kingdom of God. No; the prize is an award rather than a wage; and there is
more than one kind; e.g. Phil 4:1, 1Tim 4:8, Jas 1:12, 1Pet 5:4, and Rev 14:14.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 10:6-7 . . Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written: The
people sat down to eat and drink and got up to play.

The Bible doesn't provide much detail at Ex 32:1-6 as to what went on in camp
while Moses was up on the mountain. But one thing we know for sure is that there
was a golden calf; and the "eat and drink" to which the apostle refers was a ritual
where people sacrificed to the calf and afterwards consumed the sacrifice as an act
of communion with it; as a sort of unlicensed Passover celebration:

The Hebrew word translated "play" in Ex 32:6 is somewhat ambiguous but it's the
same word at Gen 26:8 where Isaac's conduct with his wife Rebecca strongly
suggests something more than merely athletics. In other words: the play going on
in Ex 32:6 could very well have been a cult orgy.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 10:8 . . Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and
fell in one day three and twenty thousand.

That event took place at Num 25:1-9. The fornication he's talking about wasn't
believers with believers. It was believers with unbelievers. In other words; Christ's
followers need to avoid getting romantic with unbelievers lest unbelievers lead his
followers down the primrose path into something shameful and very unbecoming.

"Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character." (1Cor 15:33)
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 10:9 . .We should not test The Lord, as some of them did-- and were slain
by snakes.

That event took place at Num 21:5-9.

The obvious lesson is that it's risky to complain about the quality, the quantity, the
nature, and/or the absence of God's providence.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 10:10 . . And do not grumble, as some of them did-- and were killed by the
destroying angel.

That incident took place at Num 14:2-38. The "grumbling" grew into a pretty large
anti-God protest. Anon it became violent and within a hair's breadth of culminating
in Joshua's and Caleb's assassination. That was a very grave moment in Israel's
history.

Anyway, Moses' people were of the opinion that God had led them out of the frying
pan into the fire by assigning them an impossible task; one that would result in
everybody's deaths had they attempted to obey His orders; viz: a suicide mission.
Joshua and Caleb tried to convince them it wasn't a suicide mission; and that with
God on their side; they would not only survive; but easily succeed. They refused to
listen; and thus became resolutely insubordinate.

Now; the obvious fatal error in their thinking was simply a lack of belief that God
would assist them to conquer the land. In point of fact, they didn't believe God was
able to in spite of all His amazing displays of supernatural power in rescuing them
from Egyptian slavery; and that's what made their unbelief all the more
inexcusable. Most of us today have never seen God in action; we've only heard tell
of His exploits; but Moses' people were eyewitnesses.

Putting this in a modern context:

New Christians are often led to believe that accepting Christ will improve their
mood and remedy their circumstances. Well; apparently somebody neglected to tell
them that they would first have to knuckle down and live a life pleasing to both God
and Christ. (John 14:23, John 15:11, Rom 12:1-2)

I'm sure you can see how easy it would be for a new Christian to become
disillusioned, disappointed, and somewhat bitter at being seemingly tricked into
trusting something that turns out to be too good to be true-- then they get to
complaining that a number of Christ's commandments are too difficult; nobody can
keep them so what's the point in even trying.

Well; that complaint is reasonable, I'll admit; but it's also insubordinate; and
worse; it's contagious. If they want to give up trying to comply with The Lord's
expectation; fine, just so long as they don't kindle large-scale rebellion in the ranks
that results in taking an entire congregation down with them.
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 10:11-12 . .These things happened to them as examples and were written
down as warnings for us, on whom the fulfillment of the ages has come. So, if you
think you are standing firm, be careful that you don't fall!

The Old Testament has given Christians a tremendous advantage. It tells them
what sells with God's people and what doesn't, so to speak.

Communism, cultural revolutions, book burning, and Islamic fanatics etc, have thus
far failed to eradicate the Bible; which is very fortunate because without a
knowledge of His people's history, God's modern-day followers would find it very
easy to repeat their mistakes.

Moths that circle too close to the flame sometimes end up scorching their wings.
That's an old proverb that pretty much echoes Paul's warning. Christians should
never think that their favored position in Christ's body somehow insulates them
from God's oversight.

The substandard compliance of Moses' people with God's expectations didn't bring
about their return to Egypt; no, "once saved always saved" applied to them as well
as to us. However, their conduct did cause them to "fall" that is: fall out of favor
with God.

That's a risk even for Christ's followers whose destiny in heaven is a sure thing;
iron clad and set in concrete. The good shepherd's sheep will never again be in
danger of eternal suffering; but they are always in danger of losing out on the
benefits of providence due to conduct unbecoming.

"If you keep my commandments, you shall abide in my love; even as I have kept
my Father's commandments, and abide in His love." (John 15:10)
_

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
● 1Cor 10:14 . .Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry.

There's that word "flee" again; which in many of its applications in the New
Testament means to run for your life.

There's more to idolatry than just bowing and/or praying to sculptures, shrines, and
paintings. It's possible to be an idolater without even being especially religious.

"Don't be greedy for the good things of this life; for that is idolatry." (Col 3:5)

Greed then, is one of the characteristics of an idolater. In other words: idolatry is
both a personality disorder and a religious issue. Even atheists qualify as idolaters if
they have a greedy personality; e.g. Wall Street's investment bankers and
commodities traders. Their "golden calf" is capital gains

It's okay to want the good things in life: after all; God has given us richly all things
to enjoy (1Tim 6:17). It's the insatiable desire for good things that makes people
idolaters; in other words avarice; which is never content; no, avarice always wants
more, more, more, more, and then some. Nowhere is that more rampant than
corporate practices that walk over the dead bodies of their employees if that's what
it takes for a better quarterly report.

I'm not exaggerating. Made-in-China outlet WALMART used to take out life
insurance policies on its employees-- not for the families; but for itself. In other
words; it named itself the beneficiary so that when an employee died, the big-box
chain recovered some of the wages and benefits they had to pay the employee
while they were on the job.

The policies are called COLI-- corporate-owned life insurance. But they're better
known in the insurance industry as "dead peasant" and/or "dead janitor" policies.
WALMART isn't the only big business doing this sort of thing. An attorney for the
Hartford Life Insurance Co. estimates that one fourth of the Fortune 500 companies
have them; which cover the lives of between 5 million and 6 million workers.

COLI policies seem to me a ghoulish way to make a buck; but then it shouldn't
surprise us that idolaters have no soul to speak of seeing as how they revere
profitability rather than God.
_