A Preterist problem passage?

[EarlyActs]

No it did not

And even if it did. Not everyone could see. Jesus said when you see it standing in the holy place.. that was impossible in 70 AD

It was not the greatest tribulation that would ever happen, it has been trumped by 2 world wars

Well you have not proven me to be in error. All i see is you trying to put things that that are not there. So your point is moot. A

I have read them, I know they happened

I look for the day when they will be restored. Which they will. Even if I am not here.

Re the horrible turmoil
He was speaking directly to his followers about what they would face. He did not say people X000 years on the future. It was direct, vital, urgent,

 

[EarlyActs]

No it did not

And even if it did. Not everyone could see. Jesus said when you see it standing in the holy place.. that was impossible in 70 AD

It was not the greatest tribulation that would ever happen, it has been trumped by 2 world wars

Well you have not proven me to be in error. All i see is you trying to put things that that are not there. So your point is moot. A

I have read them, I know they happened

I look for the day when they will be restored. Which they will. Even if I am not here.

All the things before v29 are 1st century Judean and all happened. Then the NT expects the end of the world, but also knows there is an allowance. It’s very clear and simple and dramatic.

 

[EarlyActs]

No it did not

And even if it did. Not everyone could see. Jesus said when you see it standing in the holy place.. that was impossible in 70 AD

It was not the greatest tribulation that would ever happen, it has been trumped by 2 world wars

Well you have not proven me to be in error. All i see is you trying to put things that that are not there. So your point is moot. A

I have read them, I know they happened

I look for the day when they will be restored. Which they will. Even if I am not here.

What will be restored? It always wa about believers so that’s why this world ends—in Mt 24, in 2P3, in Revelation 20–without anything mentioned in Israel and this world is destroyed and the NHNE of Is 65 comes. And no physical features are the same anyway.

 

[EarlyActs]

To see how embedded the vital history of the fulfilled destruction of Israel is in history, DM me for my links.

I assume you know Pastor Holfords work , since you looked up Josephus.

 

[EarlyActs]

Eph 2-3 says that all the technical terms for Israel’s inheritance and membership are for all believers.

 

[Eternally-Grateful]

Btw ending life on earth does not cause the return of Jesus, but the reverse. A NHNE will be made and won’t have the same kind of corporeality as now

21. For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22 And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would survive, but for the sake of the elect, those days will be shortened.

None of this happened or even came near to happen in any time in the past. Even until this day but especially in ad 70

You can not get passed this fact

 

[EarlyActs]

21. For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22 And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would survive, but for the sake of the elect, those days will be shortened.

None of this happened or even came near to happen in any time in the past. Even until this day but especially in ad 70

You can not get passed this fact

Sure I can. You are missing the point I have made several times, the NT expected everything on earth to end right after the destruction of Israel. Given those parameters, and that he was speaking about Israel , it is correct.

I am also assuming you know that gea in Greek can just mean a country, not the planet. My 24 before v29 confines itself to things about Judea and what would affect it.