• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Why?

Tambora

Junior
Joined
May 31, 2024
Messages
561
Reaction score
397
Points
63
What did I do to have me placed in a hold for my posts to be approved before they are visible?
I got this message today when I tried to post....
This message is awaiting moderator approval, and is invisible to normal visitors.
 
What did I do to have me placed in a hold for my posts to be approved before they are visible?
I got this message today when I tried to post....
This message is awaiting moderator approval, and is invisible to normal visitors.
I've had a few of those. It might depend in which Forum/thread you post in, otherwise I don't know❓
 
On many forums, there are robots who search posts for specific words or combinations of words. Sometimes a person may use a word that is on the "check" list for the forum.
The robots halt the post until a moderator can read and review.
It is robotic based on a list. You may have used a word, innocently, that when read in context, will be approved by the human moderator

Just a thought. I will be interested to see what the moderators have to say.
 
What did I do to have me placed in a hold for my posts to be approved before they are visible?
I got this message today when I tried to post....
This message is awaiting moderator approval, and is invisible to normal visitors.

You were posting in the videos forum. All submissions there (from anyone) need approval. It wasn't personal.
 
I already had 3 posts in the thread and didn't get that message when I posted those 3.
They may have gotten approved before the site got around to informing you that they were waiting approval.
 
I already had 3 posts in the thread and didn't get that message when I posted those 3.

A mod was probably right there when you posted.

All my posts have had to be approved in the YouTube section also. It's not just you.
 
The message appeared as soon as I hit "post".
The other times I hit "post" in that same thread there was no message and my post appeared immediately.
Fishy.
 
The message appeared as soon as I hit "post".
The other times I hit "post" in that same thread there was no message and my post appeared immediately.
Fishy.
Kind of funny, to me, a strict determinist: Here, modern day, we have this huge disparity of opinion on how things happen--some people actually believing there are truly random or 'chance' happenings, and others like myself who can't see how anything can possibly happen that wasn't caused to happen by what came before it (except, of course, for First Cause himself).

So we have programmers who run into so much code that they can't possibly know all the outcomes caused, but well know that whatever happens was indeed caused, and we also have authors who realize that whether a robot is "free willed" or not, the fact that nobody is always able to predict what the robot is going to do means that for all practical purposes, what the robot does can be considered "random" or "chance".

There's nothing fishy about it. Nobody here is important enough or trouble enough for the staff or owners to go to the trouble of doing fishy things concerning their posts. There are some who have been limited in what they can do, but if anything, the fact that some of your posts on that thread appeared to go through without staff approval can easily enough be attributed to programming glitches that are not yet resolved, rather than conspiracy or intent against you.

I once told a Dept Corrections inmate who thought the whole system was conspiring against him, "They don't even know you. Why would they care to go to the trouble of singling YOU out? Who do you think you are?"

This kind of reminds me of the view people have concerning Sovereign God, who chooses a vessel for one purpose, and another for another purpose, instead of being "fair" with everyone. Why would you think it is fishy, if something happened well for you sometimes, instead of being restricted equally all times? If someone gave you filet mignon for supper 1 or 2 days a week for a month, why be suspicious about the motivation, just because not all days there was steak offered?

Even when we mods post on that thread, the posts need to be approved before they show up. When that is not so, and they show up without approval, who knows why? I doubt those who designed the app that does these forums would know why.
 
Kind of funny, to me, a strict determinist: Here, modern day, we have this huge disparity of opinion on how things happen--some people actually believing there are truly random or 'chance' happenings, and others like myself who can't see how anything can possibly happen that wasn't caused to happen by what came before it (except, of course, for First Cause himself).

So we have programmers who run into so much code that they can't possibly know all the outcomes caused, but well know that whatever happens was indeed caused, and we also have authors who realize that whether a robot is "free willed" or not, the fact that nobody is always able to predict what the robot is going to do means that for all practical purposes, what the robot does can be considered "random" or "chance".

There's nothing fishy about it. Nobody here is important enough or trouble enough for the staff or owners to go to the trouble of doing fishy things concerning their posts. There are some who have been limited in what they can do, but if anything, the fact that some of your posts on that thread appeared to go through without staff approval can easily enough be attributed to programming glitches that are not yet resolved, rather than conspiracy or intent against you.

I once told a Dept Corrections inmate who thought the whole system was conspiring against him, "They don't even know you. Why would they care to go to the trouble of singling YOU out? Who do you think you are?"

This kind of reminds me of the view people have concerning Sovereign God, who chooses a vessel for one purpose, and another for another purpose, instead of being "fair" with everyone. Why would you think it is fishy, if something happened well for you sometimes, instead of being restricted equally all times? If someone gave you filet mignon for supper 1 or 2 days a week for a month, why be suspicious about the motivation, just because not all days there was steak offered?

Even when we mods post on that thread, the posts need to be approved before they show up. When that is not so, and they show up without approval, who knows why? I doubt those who designed the app that does these forums would know why.
🎼 Nobody knows the trouble I've seen. Nobody knows my sorrows. 🎼
 
🎼 Nobody knows the trouble I've seen. Nobody knows my sorrows. 🎼
Proverbs 14:10 "Each heart knows its own bitterness,
and no one else can share its joy."


Just about the loneliest verse in the Bible.
 
🎼 The preacher said something Sunday that sure did hurt.
Said man came from dust, and to dust he will return.
And I guess it’s no surprise that his message pleased our wives.
Well, ever since then they’ve been treating us like we was dirt.

🎼 Chorus:
Gloom, despair, and agony on me
Deep, dark depression, excessive misery
If it weren’t for bad luck, I’d have no luck at all
Gloom, despair, and agony on me

- Hee-Haw
 
Back
Top