• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

E M O T I O N S -- Can They Be Trusted?

Buff Scott Jr.

Sophomore
Joined
Jul 31, 2023
Messages
396
Reaction score
126
Points
43
E M O T I O N S
How Reliable Are They?

[How may a person differentiate between his own
inner urgings and the voice of God?
]


An Impulse or Heaven’s Voice?
Some time ago, I read a book, entitled, “A Closer Walk.” The author is a committed believer who loves the Lord with all of her being. She alleges that God has often talked with her. On one occasion, He called her on the phone and spoke in Hebrew, although she is not fluent in the Hebrew language. On another occasion, while driving along with her husband, God told her to tell him, “Your father is in heaven.” She hesitated. Then God said to her, “You either tell him before you turn into the campsite or you’ll have no part of me.”

Is God talking to His people in this manner today? Or is this dear sister piloted by her emotions and impulses? Her case is only one among thousands that could be cited. One of my readers sent me the following remarks and question:

“In conversation with another believer the other day, he informed me that he had been receiving messages from God. When I inquired about the form of those messages, he said God had spoken to him audibly, as well as ‘laid strong words upon my heart.’ What part of his ‘encounters’ do you think can be ascribed to human emotions?”

Far be it from me to even attempt to “prove” that God is not conversing audibly with someone who claims He is. Since the very genesis of the human family, God has communicated directly with various ones at different times. In this age, however, “...he has spoken to us by His son” (Heb. 1:2). Furthermore, during the formative years of the redeemed community, the Lord spoke to some of the early believers directly and through visions, such as Peter and Paul, or “moved” them in supernatural ways, such as Philip in Acts 8:39.

Supernatural gifts were abundant during the growing and shaping stages of the grace community. I think the question we should consider here is how often do people equate human emotions with God’s direct intervention. In my experiences with fellow believers, it is frequent.
The “Inner Voice” vs. God’s Voice
When a believer permits human emotions to overwhelm him to the point that he feels God is leading him to do and say many of the things he says and does, emotions become his master. A believer who has allowed his emotions to take control has, to a large measure, lost touch with areas of reality. God communicates with him on a personal level. He receives “revelations” no one else has received. He treads his own personal path to God’s glory and to God’s storehouse of knowledge. Many of his “spiritual” decisions and verbalizations are extraordinarily unique. An “inner voice” seems to direct many if not most of his steps. That “inner voice” is interpreted as the “voice of God” or the “voice of the Holy Spirit.”

Such encounters places the recipient on a spiritual level higher than most of the prophets of old—even higher than the Twelve Apostles, for his “revelations” are frequent and fresh. The emotion called “sensationalism” usually becomes part of his character. Emotions can be deceptive and misleading, and that is because they are part of our humanity. The issue is not whether God communicates with His children. He does. He always has—directly and verbally, often by His Spirit, other times in diverse ways. The real questions seem to be, Is God issuing new revelations to His children in this current era? Does He have prophets today who receive divine messages that are to be delivered to their intended recipients?

If “yes” to the above, what about the so-called “Twelve Apostles” of the Mormon Church who claim a continuation of divine revelations from God? Or Popes who claim to have personal access to divine intervention? A Pope once decreed—as though from God—that Catholic priests were to remain celibate. And this in spite of the truth that the Holy Spirit says, “For it is better to marry than to burn with passion” (1 Cor. 7:9). Are these “revelations” valid? No, because they collide with or contradict heaven’s testimony.
God Is Still Revealing Himself
Today, in this spiritually enlightened age, God continues to reveal Himself. He has not shut Himself off from His creation. I see God revealing Himself in at least three ways:

1) Through His Son and the written testimony (Heb. 1:2).
2) Through the Holy Spirit who personally indwells each of His children (John 14:17).
3) Through the things He has made (Rom. 1:20).

Those who sincerely rely upon emotions for guidance, and who claim to be personally contacted by God or by His Holy Spirit are, in all probability, being swayed by their own “inner voice”—a voice that denotes some deep need and is crying out for gratification. Yes, emotions play a role in everything we do in life. Without them we would be mere robots. Emotions alone must not be considered reliable evidence of divine revelations or celestial interventions, however. Heaven’s testimony—particularly the Son’s teachings and the Spirit’s “nudges”—must rank first and foremost. If there’s a clash between them, heaven’s testimony and the Spirit’s urgings must be permitted to outweigh emotions.

While emotions do play a role in one’s conversion and in one’s walk with the Lord, it would be unwise to rely more on the arousal of emotions than faith. I believe the message of salvation should appeal basically to one’s intellect or perception, although emotions do play a role.

Perhaps I can explain this in a brighter light by giving you an example. A few years ago, a friend of mine was overwhelmed with emotions after listening to a professional orator speak on the merits of salvation. Following the message, he wept uncontrollably. Those around him were convinced he had experienced genuine conversion. As it turned out, his experience was superficial. It had no root. His emotions outweighed his faith.

If this fellow’s “conversion” had been rooted in authentic faith, he might have developed a strong, viable walk with the Lord. But his “conversion” was short-lived. Once he got over being emotionally charged, he was right back in his old lifestyle. And as far as I know, the gap between him and the Lord is as wide today as it was back then.
Outward Appearances & Faith
Let me put it like this: Outward appearances in the form of emotions do not guarantee conversion. Faith that is grounded in strong conviction or persuasion can be a surety of conversion. A person whose faith is rooted in Jesus has God in his heart. A person whose “faith” is based only on the way he feels does not necessarily have God in his heart. Real faith finds its source in heaven’s testimony and consistent logic. It is not based upon the way one feels. Emotions can be deceptive, and often are. They are not always reliable.

I marvel at and discouraged with some of the TV “evangelists” who work their audiences up emotionally. They prod them into shouting, weeping, and crying out in despair for the Lord to operate upon their hearts in some special way. In conjunction with this, think of God’s plea, “Be still, and know that I am God” (Psalms 46:10).

God seems to be inviting us to quiet down and reflect upon who and what He is. Only then are we able to make rational decisions. Irrational decisions usually stem from emotions and whimsical impulses. So let us be still and meditate upon the Lord! This is equally and especially true of the unregenerate who are seeking His face.​
 
Can emotions be trusted? Yes, if they are consistent with the God's will, the circumstances of reality, well-reasoned thought.

How reliable are emotions? The word, "reliable" means "consistent good in quality or performance." Due to the transient nature of emotions, they are not, therefore, reliable. Emotions come and go. Many of them do not last more than a few seconds or minutes. Emotions can be relied upon to effect positive objectives when appropriate to the circumstances, and reliable to effect sin when inappropriate to the circumstances. No emotion happens without already existing perceptions, beliefs, and thinking. As a man thinketh, so he is, and it is out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. In extreme cases this can be lethal (spiritually speaking) and evidence a person has not been saved from sin.

However.....

The veracity of an emotion is based upon its appropriateness to the circumstance. Finding joy in fatalities in a traffic accident is a dysfunctional happiness. Finding joy in the wedding celebration of loved ones would be a healthy, functional and godly happiness - one that can and should be relied upon..... relative to that event. Healthy emotions are based on healthy thinking which, in turn, is based on healthy perceptions and beliefs. What the op describes is the over-spiritualization of revelation or, more accurately, the over-spiritualization of the want of revelation. It's a lust. It's not something that should be sought out, entertained, or indulged.

If God bothers to rend the fabric of time and space to speak to a person there won't be any doubt and no need for explanation or justification.

That part in the middle of the op is good (God is Still Revealing Himself). God has already spoken through creation, the written word, the example of Jesus, and the indwelling Spirit. These four never contradict one another. This is how a person can and should verify any purported message from God, whether it come via vision, prophecy, illumination, etc. No new information will ever contradict what God has already established. Sadly, there is a lot of bad teaching on these matters. There isn't a priest/minister/pastor, counselor, elder, mentor, discipler who doesn't routinely hear and individual abusing his own spirituality to justify questionable (if not abhorrent) behavior.


Jeremiah declared the heart deceitful above all else, sick and nearly incomprehensible (17:9). In the New Testament, Paul described the problem relying on the flesh in Romans 7-8.* Even in the indwelt, regenerate, and Spirit-empowered state a believer can be prone to doing that which they do not want to do, and not doing what they want to do, what they know to do. The mind of flesh is hostile to God, and it does not and cannot please God. Those words were written to a saved, regenerate, believing readership about the saved, regenerate, believing population. It is only the law of the Spirit that sets us free from the law of sin and death.










* Some Christians believe Romans 7 is about the pre-converted Paul. The text does not support that conclusion but even were that the case the fact is Romans 8:6 is written about Christians. It applies to the unconverted, but that is neither the audience nor the application of that verse.
.
 
Can emotions be trusted? Yes, if they are consistent with the God's will, the circumstances of reality, well-reasoned thought.

How reliable are emotions? The word, "reliable" means "consistent good in quality or performance." Due to the transient nature of emotions, they are not, therefore, reliable. Emotions come and go. Many of them do not last more than a few seconds or minutes. Emotions can be relied upon to effect positive objectives when appropriate to the circumstances, and reliable to effect sin when inappropriate to the circumstances. No emotion happens without already existing perceptions, beliefs, and thinking. As a man thinketh, so he is, and it is out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. In extreme cases this can be lethal (spiritually speaking) and evidence a person has not been saved from sin.

However.....

The veracity of an emotion is based upon its appropriateness to the circumstance. Finding joy in fatalities in a traffic accident is a dysfunctional happiness. Finding joy in the wedding celebration of loved ones would be a healthy, functional and godly happiness - one that can and should be relied upon..... relative to that event. Healthy emotions are based on healthy thinking which, in turn, is based on healthy perceptions and beliefs. What the op describes is the over-spiritualization of revelation or, more accurately, the over-spiritualization of the want of revelation. It's a lust. It's not something that should be sought out, entertained, or indulged.

If God bothers to rend the fabric of time and space to speak to a person there won't be any doubt and no need for explanation or justification.

That part in the middle of the op is good (God is Still Revealing Himself). God has already spoken through creation, the written word, the example of Jesus, and the indwelling Spirit. These four never contradict one another. This is how a person can and should verify any purported message from God, whether it come via vision, prophecy, illumination, etc. No new information will ever contradict what God has already established. Sadly, there is a lot of bad teaching on these matters. There isn't a priest/minister/pastor, counselor, elder, mentor, discipler who doesn't routinely hear and individual abusing his own spirituality to justify questionable (if not abhorrent) behavior.


Jeremiah declared the heart deceitful above all else, sick and nearly incomprehensible (17:9). In the New Testament, Paul described the problem relying on the flesh in Romans 7-8.* Even in the indwelt, regenerate, and Spirit-empowered state a believer can be prone to doing that which they do not want to do, and not doing what they want to do, what they know to do. The mind of flesh is hostile to God, and it does not and cannot please God. Those words were written to a saved, regenerate, believing readership about the saved, regenerate, believing population. It is only the law of the Spirit that sets us free from the law of sin and death.










* Some Christians believe Romans 7 is about the pre-converted Paul. The text does not support that conclusion but even were that the case the fact is Romans 8:6 is written about Christians. It applies to the unconverted, but that is neither the audience nor the application of that verse.
.
Josheb, very well expressed, my brother. Thanks again for your input.
 
Back
Top