• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

What if God was not talking about a building made of stone?

Perhaps you aren't catching the intent of the words I used. Let me rephrase slightly... "The impression that God intended to display by having this temple built of stone instead of just another tabernacle (as in the wilderness wanderings) was for Israel to have a stable, fixed location for sacrificial worship."
This is the second time you've made things personal. I understood both the content and its meaning. I asked for relevant information, and it hasn't been provided. Should I, therefore, call into question your faculties? No. How about...


Show me the verse where God reports God initiating the temple.

Then show me the verse where God chose Solomon by name to build the temple prior to 1 Chron. 28.
 
?? No offense intended. I just thought I phrased things awkwardly so that you might have misunderstood me.
Whether intended or not it is an offense. Once might be a mistake. Twice is a problem. Can I get the information I requested, or not?
 
Back
Top