The Origin of 1 Enoch

[CrowCross]

Are you going to acknowledge and deal with Posts #33 and #34?

I've responded to your speculation.

Moses quoted from Enoch.
Jude quoted from Enoch.
The early Christians harmonized with what the book of Enoch presented about Jesus long before Jesus arrived.
The Jews taught from the book of Enoch in their temples.
The book of Enoch tells us Enoch wrote it.

You simply found people and AI who disagree...and posted their speculation as truth. Basically you reposted their speculation. You have zero proof Enoch didn't write the book of Enoch. (The first two. Illumination and Parables.)

Are you now going to say the only thing Noah took on board the ark was animals?

 

[Arial]

I've responded to your speculation.

As has been demonstrated to you several times, and done so by the very definition of "speculation" what I have presented is not "my speculation". Therefore to continue to call it that is beyond the pale and it does not had credibility to your speculation which is speculation, since you have yet to give any hard evidence that you claim that Enoch the seventh from Adam is the original author of 1 Enoch. It shows you can't do what you need to do in order to prove your position. That makes it fit the difinition of "speculation".

Specilation: Reasoning based on inconclusive evidence;l conjecture or supposition. A conclusion, opinion, or theory reached by conjecture.

And I asked if you were going to acknowledge and deal with those two posts. Not simply contradict them and repeat your speculative opinion. Perhaps you need a definition of "respond to" and "deal with"?

You simply found people and AI who disagree...and posted their speculation as truth. Basically you reposted their speculation. You have zero proof Enoch didn't write the book of Enoch. (The first two. Illumination and Parables.)

No, what I did was go to the sources you gave as hard evidence of Enoch the seventh from Adam being the author, and discovered they agree with what was in the full series of the OP., and never said the ancient Enoch was the author. Then I posted it. They were your sources Crow, not mine. And you attributed to them something that was not true, assuming I guess, that no one would check your sources, but simply take your word for it. You should be aware by now, that that seldom happens on this forum.

Are you now going to say the only thing Noah took on board the ark was animals?

No. Why would I?

Now are you going to deal with posts 33 and 34 and the evidence that your sources do not agree with you but with what has been stated in the OP. And perhaps tell us how it came about that you thought they agreed with you? Or was it simply smoke and mirrors?

 

[Arial]

@CrowCross
Disagreeing with something does not make what you disagree with untrue. And it does not deal with a single issue or the OP. If one could, one would, can safely be assumed.