• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.

THE NEW TESTAMENT

jeremiah1five

BIBLICAL CHRISTIANITY
Joined
Jun 4, 2023
Messages
2,128
Reaction score
226
Points
63
Country
USA
The New Testament writers worshiped regularly in the Temple. They were well versed in the Jewish Scriptures as demonstrated by their numerous references to the prophecies and practices of the Hebrew Scriptures.
The most prolific New Testament writer, Paul, wrote almost half of the 27 New Testament books. His Jewish background is indisputable. He was a son of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin, and a Pharisee.

Paul boasted that prior to becoming a believer in Yeshua (Jesus), he was advancing in Judaism beyond many Jews of his own age and was extremely zealous for the traditions of his fathers. His familiarity with Jewish tradition, thought and theology remained an integral part of his preaching. He drew heavily from the Hebrew Bible, and the audiences to whom he preached were well acquainted with the Hebrew Scriptures.
Paul’s Jewishness is evident in the focus of his writing as well. This is true of all the New Testament writers. For if the book dealt only with Gentile issues, it could hardly be regarded as Jewish.

The pages of the New Testament clearly follow the framework of Judaism. The first four books, the gospels, addressed a Jewish audience. They echoed the pattern of historical narratives interspersed with instruction found in the Torah. “The controversies between Jesus and the Scribes/Pharisees have no reference outside the community of Israel; Jesus’ preaching of the coming kingdom could have had meaning only for Jews; the synagogues in which Jesus reads from the prophets, heals the sick, and forgives sins are Jewish houses of worship for believing Jews and not unconverted gentiles.…” The Jewish festivals that are celebrated throughout the pages of the New Testament were not feasts of interest to the Gentiles but were part of the daily life of the Jewish people.

The four gospel accounts contain numerous references to the Hebrew Scriptures, references that deal with the messianic theme. This is clearly seen in the narration of the birth of Yeshua. His conception was prophesied in Isaiah 7:14 and referred to in Matthew: “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel, which means ‘God with us’” (1:23).
His birth in Bethlehem was foretold by the prophet Micah in chapter 5:2, “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times,” and quoted in Matthew 2:6.

Matthew also relies heavily on Hebrew Scriptures. In the second chapter of his narrative, he relates the flight into Egypt of Joseph and Mary (Miriam) and the slaughter of the innocents by Herod. Going back to the law of the Nazarite in Numbers 6:1-21, Matthew concludes this story with Joseph’s return to Israel to settle in Nazareth, “And he went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets, ‘He will be called a Nazarene’” (Matthew 2:23).

This appeal to fulfilled prophecy continues with Mark, who prefaces his gospel account with, “It is written in Isaiah the Prophet.” He cites Isaiah, “A voice of one calling: In the desert prepare the way for the Lord” (40:3), and Malachi, “See, I will send my messenger, who will prepare the way before me” (3:1).

“It is written” occurs time and again in the pages that follow as the New Testament writers buttress their arguments with the Hebrew Scriptures-the Law, the prophets and the writings. The two testaments fit together; one does not supersede the other. “The New Testament is regarded by Christians as the fulfillment of the prophecies and the teachings contained in the Old.”

In Acts 2:14-28, Peter, known as “the apostle to the Jewish people,” began his ministry with a lengthy quotation from the Hebrew prophet Joel. He then affirmed that Yeshua was the Messiah, citing Psalm 16:10, “Because you will not leave my soul in Hades, nor will you allow your Holy One to see corruption” (Acts 2:27). His hearers, with the events of the crucifixion still fresh in their memory, were “cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, ‘Men and brethren, what shall we do?’ “(Acts 2:37).

For the most part, the New Testament depicts Jewish people dealing with other Jews on questions of importance to their people.
In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus tells his followers, “So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the Gentiles run after all these things.” Yeshua goes on to encourage his followers to “seek first [God’s] kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.” The heavenly kingdom and God’s righteousness were familiar concepts to Yeshua’s Jewish followers.

Likewise, when Jesus sent out his disciples, he told them, “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.”

The Book of Acts tells how Stephen, the first Jesus-believing Jewish martyr, stood before his accusers and cited the history of his people. This Jewish man spoke before a Jewish crowd, about their Jewish ancestors. And, not unlike many of the Jewish prophets of old, Stephen was dragged out of the city and stoned.
The book of Hebrews begins with: “In the past God spoke to our fathers through the prophets.…” The writer then refers to passage upon passage from the Hebrew Scriptures.

Hebrews 11 has been called “The Roll Call of Faith.” It honors Abel, Enoch and Noah for their faith and goes on to commend the patriarchs, Moses and Joshua, as well as Rahab. It then follows with the heroes Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah and concludes by touching on the many unnamed heroes in Israel’s history. Verse 34 and following speak of those who “quenched the fury of the flames and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies.” The unnamed martyrs, those who were tortured, mocked, scourged and who suffered affliction and torment for the sake of the God in whom they believed are all cited. These men and women gave themselves as a part of Israel’s bloody legacy-Jewish martyrs, dying in the name of the God of their Jewish ancestors.

The whole chapter is a summary of Jewish history, not Babylonian, not Egyptian, not Roman history. The book of Hebrews lives up to its name. It was written by a Hebrew to persons of Hebrew descent who were well acquainted with their Scriptures.

Other New Testament writers concern themselves with Israel and with Jewish matters. James addressed “the twelve tribes scattered among the nations” (James 1:1). Peter addressed “God’s elect, strangers in the world, scattered.…” (1 Peter 1:1).

Jude, in his brief letter, speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah, Michael the archangel, Moses, Cain, Balaam and Korah. These references would be baffling to anyone lacking knowledge of the Torah.

In the last book of the New Testament, Revelation, we see God’s continual care for his people Israel. It is written that the tribes of Israel will one day be revived and identified (Revelation 7) and that a glorious New Jerusalem will have twelve gates inscribed with the names of the tribes of Israel (21:9-27)
In its authorship, content and focus there is hardly a book more Jewish than the New Testament.
 
The New Testament writers worshiped regularly in the Temple.
No, they did not. When the apostles first started preaching the gospel they did so in the outer courtyards of the temple and synagogues wherever they went, and they did so because Gentiles were not allowed inside the temple/synagogues. Eventually their preaching drew converts way from mainline Judaism that rejected Jesus as the Messiah and this became and economic and political liability for the Jewish leaders (and often times secular merchants and town leaders, too). The Jews began to persecute Christians so Christians began to meet in people's homes where they could do so without persecution. The apostles continued to go first to the synagogues but as they entered the larger cities they also went into the marketplaces and religious centers (such as the Areopagus).

Just because all the NT writers had previously been Jews and referenced Tanakh throughout their writings does not mean their audience was Jewish. That reasoning creates genetic and false-cause fallacies.

Tell me why it is so important to you that the New Testament be written only to Jewish converts to Christ.
 
The New Testament writers worshiped regularly in the Temple. They were well versed in the Jewish Scriptures as demonstrated by their numerous references to the prophecies and practices of the Hebrew Scriptures.
The most prolific New Testament writer, Paul, wrote almost half of the 27 New Testament books. His Jewish background is indisputable. He was a son of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin, and a Pharisee.

Paul boasted that prior to becoming a believer in Yeshua (Jesus), he was advancing in Judaism beyond many Jews of his own age and was extremely zealous for the traditions of his fathers. His familiarity with Jewish tradition, thought and theology remained an integral part of his preaching. He drew heavily from the Hebrew Bible, and the audiences to whom he preached were well acquainted with the Hebrew Scriptures.
Paul’s Jewishness is evident in the focus of his writing as well. This is true of all the New Testament writers. For if the book dealt only with Gentile issues, it could hardly be regarded as Jewish.

The pages of the New Testament clearly follow the framework of Judaism. The first four books, the gospels, addressed a Jewish audience. They echoed the pattern of historical narratives interspersed with instruction found in the Torah. “The controversies between Jesus and the Scribes/Pharisees have no reference outside the community of Israel; Jesus’ preaching of the coming kingdom could have had meaning only for Jews; the synagogues in which Jesus reads from the prophets, heals the sick, and forgives sins are Jewish houses of worship for believing Jews and not unconverted gentiles.…” The Jewish festivals that are celebrated throughout the pages of the New Testament were not feasts of interest to the Gentiles but were part of the daily life of the Jewish people.

The four gospel accounts contain numerous references to the Hebrew Scriptures, references that deal with the messianic theme. This is clearly seen in the narration of the birth of Yeshua. His conception was prophesied in Isaiah 7:14 and referred to in Matthew: “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel, which means ‘God with us’” (1:23).
His birth in Bethlehem was foretold by the prophet Micah in chapter 5:2, “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times,” and quoted in Matthew 2:6.

Matthew also relies heavily on Hebrew Scriptures. In the second chapter of his narrative, he relates the flight into Egypt of Joseph and Mary (Miriam) and the slaughter of the innocents by Herod. Going back to the law of the Nazarite in Numbers 6:1-21, Matthew concludes this story with Joseph’s return to Israel to settle in Nazareth, “And he went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets, ‘He will be called a Nazarene’” (Matthew 2:23).

This appeal to fulfilled prophecy continues with Mark, who prefaces his gospel account with, “It is written in Isaiah the Prophet.” He cites Isaiah, “A voice of one calling: In the desert prepare the way for the Lord” (40:3), and Malachi, “See, I will send my messenger, who will prepare the way before me” (3:1).

“It is written” occurs time and again in the pages that follow as the New Testament writers buttress their arguments with the Hebrew Scriptures-the Law, the prophets and the writings. The two testaments fit together; one does not supersede the other. “The New Testament is regarded by Christians as the fulfillment of the prophecies and the teachings contained in the Old.”

In Acts 2:14-28, Peter, known as “the apostle to the Jewish people,” began his ministry with a lengthy quotation from the Hebrew prophet Joel. He then affirmed that Yeshua was the Messiah, citing Psalm 16:10, “Because you will not leave my soul in Hades, nor will you allow your Holy One to see corruption” (Acts 2:27). His hearers, with the events of the crucifixion still fresh in their memory, were “cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, ‘Men and brethren, what shall we do?’ “(Acts 2:37).

For the most part, the New Testament depicts Jewish people dealing with other Jews on questions of importance to their people.
In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus tells his followers, “So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the Gentiles run after all these things.” Yeshua goes on to encourage his followers to “seek first [God’s] kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.” The heavenly kingdom and God’s righteousness were familiar concepts to Yeshua’s Jewish followers.

Likewise, when Jesus sent out his disciples, he told them, “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.”

The Book of Acts tells how Stephen, the first Jesus-believing Jewish martyr, stood before his accusers and cited the history of his people. This Jewish man spoke before a Jewish crowd, about their Jewish ancestors. And, not unlike many of the Jewish prophets of old, Stephen was dragged out of the city and stoned.
The book of Hebrews begins with: “In the past God spoke to our fathers through the prophets.…” The writer then refers to passage upon passage from the Hebrew Scriptures.

Hebrews 11 has been called “The Roll Call of Faith.” It honors Abel, Enoch and Noah for their faith and goes on to commend the patriarchs, Moses and Joshua, as well as Rahab. It then follows with the heroes Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah and concludes by touching on the many unnamed heroes in Israel’s history. Verse 34 and following speak of those who “quenched the fury of the flames and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies.” The unnamed martyrs, those who were tortured, mocked, scourged and who suffered affliction and torment for the sake of the God in whom they believed are all cited. These men and women gave themselves as a part of Israel’s bloody legacy-Jewish martyrs, dying in the name of the God of their Jewish ancestors.

The whole chapter is a summary of Jewish history, not Babylonian, not Egyptian, not Roman history. The book of Hebrews lives up to its name. It was written by a Hebrew to persons of Hebrew descent who were well acquainted with their Scriptures.

Other New Testament writers concern themselves with Israel and with Jewish matters. James addressed “the twelve tribes scattered among the nations” (James 1:1). Peter addressed “God’s elect, strangers in the world, scattered.…” (1 Peter 1:1).

Jude, in his brief letter, speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah, Michael the archangel, Moses, Cain, Balaam and Korah. These references would be baffling to anyone lacking knowledge of the Torah.

In the last book of the New Testament, Revelation, we see God’s continual care for his people Israel. It is written that the tribes of Israel will one day be revived and identified (Revelation 7) and that a glorious New Jerusalem will have twelve gates inscribed with the names of the tribes of Israel (21:9-27)
In its authorship, content and focus there is hardly a book more Jewish than the New Testament.
Yes, the NT is the fulfillment of the OT, therefore there will be much to say about the OT which it fulfills.
 
James addressed “the twelve tribes scattered among the nations” (James 1:1). Peter addressed “God’s elect, strangers in the world, scattered.…” (1 Peter 1:1).
James introduced himself as a bondservant of Christ, and stated his readers held to a faith in "our glorious Lord Jesus Christ," and the Spirit dwelt within them (vss. 2:1; 4:6). If the James of James' epistle is the same James in Acts 15's council in Jerusalem, then there were Gentiles in that Christian congregation. One of them was a Roman Centurion. If this is the same James that settled the apostolic council's debate in Acts 15 and approved Paul as the messenger to the Gentiles, then that's implicit acceptance and affirmation of Paul's teaching there are no Jews or Gentiles in Christ. Peter explicitly approved of Paul's writings and called them "scripture." Peter addressed his first letter "to those who are chosen," spread out in the various regions he mentioned. He did not specify "Jew." He described how they been sanctified by the Spirit and sprinkled with Christ's blood. In the intro to his second letter, he took a cue from Paul and called himself a bondservant of Christ. There are close to three dozen mentions of Christ and the Holy Spirit but not a single mention of "Jew," Jews," or "Jewish," or "Judaism.
 
Yes, the NT is the fulfillment of the OT, therefore there will be much to say about the OT which it fulfills.
No, Christ is the fulfillment.
The New Covenant Scriptures only talk about Israel's Messiah's effect on the covenants, promises, and prophecies of the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets.
 
No, Christ is the fulfillment.
The New Covenant Scriptures only talk about Israel's Messiah's effect on the covenants, promises, and prophecies of the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets.
No, they talk about their fulfillment.
 
No, Christ is the fulfillment.
The New Covenant Scriptures only talk about Israel's Messiah's effect on the covenants, promises, and prophecies of the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets.
Not quite.

Christ - and his body - fulfill the promises and prophecies of God. We are the house not built by human hands, we are God's temple, we are the nation of holy people, we are the nation of royal priests, we are the people who were not God's people now God's people.


Were you born and raised Jewish?
 
Were you born and raised Jewish?
He said he was not Jewish or Gentile. (Don't know if it was this thread.) Given some other things he has said today indicating he and only he of all people of all time, know what is true, combine with being neither Jew nor Gentile, I am inclined to make some assumptions that I will not state. In any case, I had to give him a two day ban for all the insults and failure to heed the warnings. So it may be a couple of days before you hear from him.
 
....he and only he of all people of all time, know what is true.....
A lot of posters here say that about others. I've read it said about me (even though I have never claimed any such thing). Rarely see the relevance to the topic of discussion.
 
A lot of posters here say that about others. I've read it said about me (even though I have never claimed any such thing). Rarely see the relevance to the topic of discussion.
He claimed it.
 
Given some other things he has said today indicating he and only he of all people of all time, know what is true....
A lot of posters here say that about others. I've read it said about me (even though I have never claimed any such thing). Rarely see the relevance to the topic of discussion.
He claimed it.
I reiterate: Many posters here say that about others. I've read it said about me (even though I have never claimed any such thing). I've even seen some presume to know the mind of others when telling those others, they think the others think the others know more. Rarely is it relevant to the topic of discourse.



But.....

Knowing whether or not a poster who asserts the epistolary was written to and about Jewish converts is Jewish or raised Jewish might be relevant. All the more curious if claiming to be neither Jew nor Gentile. Maybe he's not human ;). Even aliens from another planet would be considered "Gentile" from the biblical pov :unsure:.
 
I reiterate: Many posters here say that about others. I've read it said about me (even though I have never claimed any such thing). I've even seen some presume to know the mind of others when telling those others, they think the others think the others know more. Rarely is it relevant to the topic of discourse.
You really didn't need to reiterate it. And it isn't about you. I was only giving you a heads up.
Knowing whether or not a poster who asserts the epistolary was written to and about Jewish converts is Jewish or raised Jewish might be relevant. All the more curious if claiming to be neither Jew nor Gentile. Maybe he's not human ;). Even aliens from another planet would be considered "Gentile" from the biblical pov :unsure:
Exactly, given other things that were said.
 
You really didn't need to reiterate it.
I know. I do not need you to tell me I do not need to reiterate it.
And it isn't about you.
Never said it was.
I was only giving you a heads up.
I know.
Exactly, given other things that were said.
You really didn't need to tell me.
He said he was not Jewish or Gentile. (Don't know if it was this thread.) Given some other things he has said today indicating he and only he of all people of all time, know what is true, combine with being neither Jew nor Gentile, I am inclined to make some assumptions that I will not state. In any case, I had to give him a two day ban for all the insults and failure to heed the warnings. So it may be a couple of days before you hear from him.
;)

Appreciated, but he's the best one to speak for/about himself in the current exchange, although I am beginning to doubt even that given......
The New Testament writers worshiped regularly in the Temple.
Nonsense


.......unless the temple he means is that of John 2:21 and 1 Corinthians 3:16. We still worship there ;). God does not dwell in houses built by human hands.

Acts 11:19-21
So then those who were scattered because of the persecution that occurred in connection with Stephen made their way to Phoenicia and Cyprus and Antioch, speaking the word to no one except to Jews alone. But there were some of them, men of Cyprus and Cyrene, who came to Antioch and began speaking to the Greeks also, preaching the Lord Jesus. And the hand of the Lord was with them, and a large number who believed turned to the Lord.

This idea the New Testament was written only to Jewish Christians is absurd.
 
Naphtali is one of the Hebrew tribes of Israel. He is not Gentile, and his plot of land is the area of Galilee.
Jesus is speaking to Israel when He calls them to repent. Only Jews would understand the term "kingdom of heaven."
This seems to be right.

Why is the land of Zebulun and Naphtali called “Galilee of the Gentiles?” Why wasn’t it known as an Israelite region, but instead a Gentile region? Gesenius’ Hebrew Lexicon says of Galilee,


Circuit, region, especially Isa 8:23, the circuit [Galilee] of the Gentiles. … [In] 1 Kin 9:11 [it] is the name of a region with twenty cities, although small ones, in the tribe of Naphtali, around the city Kedesh, inhabited by Gentiles, namely the neighboring Phoenicians.

And Strong’s:


[Galilee is] A territory in Naphtali largely occupied by heathen; a circuit of towns around Kedesh-Naphtali, in which were situated the twenty towns given by Solomon to Hiram king of Tyre as payment for his work in conveying timber from Lebanon to Jerusalem.

But in 731 BC,


In the days of Pekah king of Israel, Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria came and took Ijon, Abel Beth Maachah, Janoah, Kedesh, Hazor, Gilead, and Galilee, all the land of Naphtali; and he carried them captive to Assyria. 2 Kin 15:29

The original Israelites from the tribes of Naphtali and Zebulun were removed, and the peoples of the (Gentile) nations gradually moved in to replace them. As well, when the Jews returned to their land from the Babylonian captivity, some of them settled the Galilee too. So it was, in the time of Yeshua, that the land was mixed, Gentiles and Jews, but it seems the majority Gentiles, so that the prophecy termed them the people sitting in darkness.
 
This seems to be right.

Why is the land of Zebulun and Naphtali called “Galilee of the Gentiles?” Why wasn’t it known as an Israelite region, but instead a Gentile region? Gesenius’ Hebrew Lexicon says of Galilee,
We can go further to who occupied the land before Israel crossed the Jordan and conquered it.
And Strong’s:
But in 731 BC,
The original Israelites from the tribes of Naphtali and Zebulun were removed, and the peoples of the (Gentile) nations gradually moved in to replace them. As well, when the Jews returned to their land from the Babylonian captivity, some of them settled the Galilee too. So it was, in the time of Yeshua, that the land was mixed, Gentiles and Jews, but it seems the majority Gentiles, so that the prophecy termed them the people sitting in darkness.
I suppose it depends WHEN one is talking about WHO was there, yes?
 
Back
Top