• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

THE LANGUAGE OF THE DONKEY

Joined
Jul 31, 2023
Messages
374
Reaction score
118
Points
43
The Dialect of the Donkey

[Our God functions in a diversity of
HUMAN AFFAIRS]

When the donkey’s master removed her from her stall that morning and placed a saddle upon her back, the donkey had not the slightest idea that during her journey that day she would be speaking the language of her master. Nor did her master have the slightest premonition that he and his beast of burden would be conversing as two humans converse. But it happened.

The king of Moab tried to persuade Balaam to curse Israel in an effort to avoid being overrun and swallowed up like the nations around him. Twice he sent his elders and princes to Balaam. On their first visit, the Lord told Balaam not to go with them. But on their second visit, when more pressure was applied, the Lord told Balaam to go with them, “...but only do what I tell you”

Along the way, an angel of the Lord stood in their path as an adversary, even after instructing Balaam to go ahead and make the trip. The angel’s sword was drawn and ready to kill. The donkey saw the angel, but Balaam didn’t.

Immediately the donkey turned aside out of the road and took Balaam into the field. Balaam struck the donkey, to turn her back into the road. Then the angel stood into a narrow path with a wall on both sides. When the donkey saw the angel again, she pushed against the wall and pressed Balaam’s foot against it. That hurt! In response, Balaam whipped her again.

But it wasn’t over yet. Then the angel stood in a narrow place, where there was no way to turn, either to the right or to the left. What was the donkey to do now? She laid down under Balaam. He couldn’t understand why his lifelong donkey, who had served him for many years, was behaving irrationally. Balaam became quite angry and abused his donkey again. At that point, “the Lord opened the mouth of the donkey,” and she said to Balaam...

What have I done to you, that you have struck me these three times?” One would think Balaam’s reply would have been something like this, “Hey, what goes here? When did you learn to talk? You’re talking my language! You aren’t supposed to be able to speak the language of humans. What’s wrong here?”

Instead of thinking something was strangely absurd and impossible, Balaam replied to his beast of burden, “Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you.” The donkey said to Balaam, “Am I not your donkey, on which you have ridden all your life long to this day? Is it my habit to treat you this way?” And Balaam replied, “No!”

Then the Lord opened Balaam’s eyes and he saw the angel standing in the way, with his sword drawn in his hand. And Balaam bowed down, fell on his face, and admitted he had sinned. The angel told him that if his donkey had not turned aside, “I would have killed you and let her live...I have come out to oppose you because your way is perverse before me.”

But how was Balaam’s behavior reckless? Why would the Lord tell him to go with the princes of Moab but then stand in his way? In what way was Balaam perverse? It was because he provoked the Lord to anger by being too neighborly and too cooperative with Israel’s enemies—by patronizing them and appearing to be agreeable to their cause. But in the end, the Lord used Balaam to speak four divine oracles that blessed Israel and condemned her enemies [Num. 22 & 23]. In other words, the Lord spoke through a man with a questionable reputation to bless His people.

However, as the story of Balaam unfolds, and as odd as it may seem, Israel’s army killed him in battle [Num. 31:8]. Earlier, on Balaam’s advice, he caused the people of Israel to act treacherously against the Lord at Peor [Num. 23:28-29]. Joshua says Balaam “practiced divination” [13:22].

So what do we have? Apparently, Balaam was a counterfeit prophet whom the Lord used to His advantage. The Lord employs a diversity of strategies to communicate His schemes and His purposes, even opening the mouth of a brute animal to relay His message. Humorous? Yes. Our Lord is not above being amusing. He even called King Herod a fox! But making a donkey talk is not as amusing as the donkey’s master not detecting it! Now that’s funny.​
 
Balaam is certainly a strange and hard man to define. I would not call him a counterfiet prophet, as he appears to be familiar with God, and God with him. (Num. 22:9-10) "And God came unto Balaam,and said, What men are these with thee? And Balaam said unto God, Balaak the son of Zippor, king of Moab, hath sent unto me, saying,"

Balaam explained why the men were at his home. They wanted him to curse this new people come out of Egypt. (Num. 22:11) Thus God told him, don't go with them and don't curse this peple as they are blessed. (Num. 22:12) And Balaam obeyed. (Num. 22:13)

But, the men returned with an 'offer of reward' if Balaam would come and curse this people. (Num. 22:17) Balaam at first seemed obedient to God. (Num. 22:18) But then he said, (Num. 22:19), "Now therefore, I pray you, tarry ye also here this night, that I may know what the LORD will say unto me more."

The 'offer of reward' landed. Balaam didn't have to seek to know what the Lord might further say. He knew what the LORD had said unto him. 'Don't go with them and don't curse this people.' He hoped God would change His mind and let him go and receive the reward.

So, I would not call Balaam a 'counterfiet prophet'. Nor would I call him a 'false prophet'. As Balaam never did give a false prophecy. He was true to all that God said in his propheceis.

I believe Balaam was a true prophet of God who was affected by lure of reward. A good description of him would be a 'heirling prophet' A prophet seeking a profit.

Remember the historical setting. Balaam lived at a time when the nation Israel did not exist. It was just getting started. He was a prophet before Israel. Making him 'not' a prophet of Israel. Similar to Melchizedek who Abraham encountered, who was priest of the Most High God. (Gen. 14:18) But he was not a priest of the Aaronic order.

Between Adam and Israel, God always had His people.

Lees
 
Balaam is certainly a strange and hard man to define. I would not call him a counterfiet prophet, as he appears to be familiar with God, and God with him. (Num. 22:9-10) "And God came unto Balaam,and said, What men are these with thee? And Balaam said unto God, Balaak the son of Zippor, king of Moab, hath sent unto me, saying,"

Balaam explained why the men were at his home. They wanted him to curse this new people come out of Egypt. (Num. 22:11) Thus God told him, don't go with them and don't curse this peple as they are blessed. (Num. 22:12) And Balaam obeyed. (Num. 22:13)

But, the men returned with an 'offer of reward' if Balaam would come and curse this people. (Num. 22:17) Balaam at first seemed obedient to God. (Num. 22:18) But then he said, (Num. 22:19), "Now therefore, I pray you, tarry ye also here this night, that I may know what the LORD will say unto me more."

The 'offer of reward' landed. Balaam didn't have to seek to know what the Lord might further say. He knew what the LORD had said unto him. 'Don't go with them and don't curse this people.' He hoped God would change His mind and let him go and receive the reward.

So, I would not call Balaam a 'counterfiet prophet'. Nor would I call him a 'false prophet'. As Balaam never did give a false prophecy. He was true to all that God said in his propheceis.

I believe Balaam was a true prophet of God who was affected by lure of reward. A good description of him would be a 'heirling prophet' A prophet seeking a profit.

Remember the historical setting. Balaam lived at a time when the nation Israel did not exist. It was just getting started. He was a prophet before Israel. Making him 'not' a prophet of Israel. Similar to Melchizedek who Abraham encountered, who was priest of the Most High God. (Gen. 14:18) But he was not a priest of the Aaronic order.

Between Adam and Israel, God always had His people.

Lees
Lees, whatever the case, Joshua says Balaam “practiced divination” [13:22].

Thank you.
 
Lees, whatever the case, Joshua says Balaam “practiced divination” [13:22].

Thank you.

That would be (Joshua 13:22).

Practicing 'divination' itself was not wrong. The God one was 'divining' to/for would make the difference.

Joseph also could divine. (Gen. 44:15) "And Joseph said unto them, What deed is this that ye have done? wot ye not that such a man as I can certainly divine?"

Lees
 
Last edited:
That would be (Joshua 13:22).

Practicing 'divination' itself was not wrong. The God one was 'divining' to/for would make the difference.

Joseph also could divine. (Gen. 44:15) "And Joseph said unto them, What deed is this that ye have done? wot ye not that such a man as I can certainly divine?"

Lees
To divine is simply to prophecy. . (declare the will of one not seen.) It's what prophets do. True and false apostles

False prophets' like Ballam divine false prophecy as oral traditions of dying mankind.

God used Ballams Ass to prophecy as a true apostle against the false prophet God's living word stopped the madness of Ballam.

Using an ass an unclean animal to represent the non-redeemed a Lamb must be used to redeem or break the neck just as if never born the first time

God is not served by the dying hands as a will of mankind in any way shape or form
 
Back
Top