Accuse me baselessly and falsely; I do care, and it does nothing to prove this op correct. My bluntness can be forgiven, disdained, or ignored, but that has nothing to do with the fact the posts contradict themselves.
No, we
do not. ALL anyone knows is what is posted. There's not a single person here who knows how to read the minds of complete posters writing hundreds of miles away from one another. Intelligent people know a contradiction when they read it, regardless of what might have been meant AND intelligent people correct their own contradictions when they are pointed out.
The two cities and the number seven would be irrelevant if it weren't for the current set of eclipses. There are literally hundreds of cities in the US that are named after cities in Old Testament Israel. Oh! My bad! I just googled that to check and I was wrong. There are more than
1000 cities in the US named after cities in the Bible.
Two is inconsequential.
And if it weren't for the pending eclipse that article would never have been written.
I gave the benefit of the doubt. I'd be contradicting myself telling someone who knows how to use the computer to surf the internet to use her brain if I did not think you had one. I assumed you have a brain AND possess the ability to use it AND possessed enough intelligence to see the contradictions once noted AND enough conscience and honesty to correct the problem directly, immediately, graciously, and without further subterfuge. You're making things worse, not better!
Bye.
The facts remain as follows:
- The article referenced in the op wouldn't exist if it weren't for the eclipses cited in the article.
- The article referenced in the op argues a false correlation, assuming eclipses over seven Ninevahs are an opportunity for change when the facts are none of those Ninevahs was proven to need change and opportunities for change exist all day every day. We don't need eclipses to signal change.
- The article referenced in the op contradicts itself when it says, "I am not anticipating that any particular event will happen on April 8th. Rather, I believe that what we will witness on April 8th is a sign and a warning for the entire nation." A sign would be a change! One day there is no sign; the next day there's not just one sign... but seven of them! Two sets of seven signs! That is a change.
- The article referenced in the op does not prove the current set of eclipses is a sign; it assumes the eclipses are a sign.
- Nothing eschatologically relevant was proven in the article or the opening post..... and this is the Eschatology - End Times and Prophecy board. If there is no eschatological significance to the eclipses then this article does not belong in this board.
- This opening post asks, "Is this a part of prophecy of signs and the heavens?" and the answer is an unqualified "No!" NOTHING in these 18 posts proves otherwise.
- The author of the article is baiting his readers. He qualifies his information and his unstated suppositions with "I am not anticipating that any particular event will happen..." If that's true then why bring up any of it. It's bait, and he is preying off of Christians that hold to a very specific end times view. That makes it predatory. He is hawking his book and doing so from a Chamber of Commerce website.
- The posts do, in fact, contradict themselves. It happens first saying seven eclipses in seven cities is a sign, then saying it is not about eclipses and then saying eclipses are salient. That should be self-evident.
- The opportunity to remedy or address every one of the above points availed itself and nothing was done.
- If your own answer to the question asked in this opening post is, "No," then you and I have agreement and the response to Post 2 should have been affirmative and collaborative. I am not the enemy.
The way I went about this may not be liked or valued, but any disdain for my methods does not change the facts in evidence.
NOTHING eschatologically relevant will happen on or consequent to April 8's eclipse and all the Salems and Ninevahs in the world do not need to wait to change -
assuming they need to change!!! One or more of those Ninevahs might be the most right-living city in the country. Did Mr. Snyder bother to mention that? Nope! Did it ever cross his mind? The article is silent to that effect. The only ones enticed by Mr. Snyder's efforts are those already vulnerable to his predations.
James 1:13-15
Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am being tempted by God;" for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.
I say the following to all modern futurists:
Be more discerning! Not every person marketing modern futurism is doing so righteously (few, if any are, imo). People like Snyder are
preying on your desires for end times information. He is not your friend. Be more discerning.
If I come back a month from now, a year from now, a decade from now and ask the exact same question asked in this opening post, "Is this a part of prophecy of signs and the heavens?" the answer will be the same: No, and Snyder was wrong to write that article, wrong to speculate without substance, wrong to entice the vulnerable, wrong to prey on modern futurists, and wrong to reason so fallaciously and without and scriptural roof. Look
HERE,
HERE,
HERE, AND
HERE. If he genuinely believed what he writes he'd be living his life much differently. He is a profiteering doomsdayer, not someone earnest Christians should consider veracious.