• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Philippians 4:8 -- A Framework for Online Discourse

DialecticSkeptic

John Bauer
Staff member
Joined
Jun 19, 2023
Messages
854
Reaction score
1,535
Points
113
Age
46
Location
Canada
Faith
Reformed (URCNA)
Country
Canada
Marital status
Married
Politics
Kingdom of God

"Think about these things"—and write your post accordingly.​


Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is worthy of respect, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if something is excellent or praiseworthy, think about these things.
Forum discussions are not neutral spaces. Every word you type reveals your heart. In this epistle to the Philippians we have not so much a private meditation exercise as a discipleship imperative. It calls you to think, yes, but not merely to think. It summons believers to cultivate Spirit-wrought, disciplined holiness of mind by fixing their thoughts on the objective moral virtues of truth, honor, justice, purity, loveliness, commendability, excellence, and praiseworthiness—virtues grounded in God's unchanging character and revealed Word. This Spirit-enabled meditation, shaped by the mind of Christ, calls for the careful curation of thoughts and words with sacred reverence, rejecting the moral confusion of the age for the sake of Christ's glory in our speech, writing, and digital conduct. Forum discussions become arenas of spiritual warfare, where every word must be brought captive to the obedience of Christ and offered coram Deo, before the face of God. Participants are not free to mirror the spirit of the age but must speak from minds renewed by grace and governed by scripture. Let every contribution be a faithful echo of God's truth, flowing from hearts transformed by sovereign mercy.
 

1. What we post should speak what is true.​

God is not merely truthful, he is truth. So, falsehood in any form—exaggerations, selective omissions, distortions, and so on—is not just unethical in human terms but contrary to the character of God as revealed in Christ Jesus. A Christian should never post anything for rhetorical advantage, never anything that he would hesitate to speak coram Deo—in the presence of God, under the authority of God, and for the glory of God. Hard to believe as it may be, what we as Christians say here in these forums will come up before the judgment seat of Christ. In this world enslaved to the values, desires, and motivations of sinful man, maintaining a Christ-like character in our words is a form of courage, and understanding and clarity are acts of love. Avoid lies and half-truths, misrepresentations, deceit, and so on. Refuse to manipulate facts, ideas, or feelings in order to win arguments. Always give thanks to God the Father for each other in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and submit to one another out of reverence for Christ (Eph 5:20-21).

2. What we post should pursue what is honorable.​

This term (τὸ σεμνόν, honorable) denotes gravity, moral weight, and dignity, the sort of reverent speech that befits those who walk with God. It is the opposite of flippancy, mockery, juvenile sarcasm, belittling, and so on. Online platforms tend to reward belligerence, derision, rhetorical domination, and triviality, but the Christian is called to a different metric, namely, what is fitting in the presence of a holy God. That is what we want to promote and reward here. Let your tone be marked by reverence and a cruciform intent, not self-importance or language that trades dignity for likes or diminishes or objectifies others. Remember, what flows to the keyboard is the content of your heart. "On the day of judgment, people will give an account for every worthless word they speak" (Matt 12:36). The words of the righteous reflect the fountain of life, and love doesn't dwell on the wrongs that others do. Behind the words of the wicked hides evil, and a heart of hate stirs up trouble. (Prov. 10:11-12, paraphrase).

3. What we post should uphold what is just.​

This refers to that which is upright and morally right, conforming to God's fixed standard of justice rather than to human opinions. Biblically, it describes the character of God himself (Rev 16:5), the sinlessness of Christ (1 John 2:1), and the moral life of believers called to Spirit-empowered covenantal obedience (Eph 4:24; Rom. 8:13). To center our efforts on what is just, then, is to meditate on all that accords with God's will, judgments, and the right ordering of human conduct under his sovereign authority. In the context of our discussion forums, it means resisting the temptation to side with human notions of fairness, culturally fashionable definitions of justice, or even one's preferred group when their cause departs from God's standards. The righteous do not shift with the winds of culture, nor are they partial to power or the majority. Righteousness is not tribal, it is covenantal. Resist favoritism and factionalism; evaluate every claim, every cause, and every conflict through the lens of God's revealed will. Speak for the truth, even when it costs you socially or complicates your narrative.

4. What we post should be Christ-like and unblemished in its devotion to him (pure).​

The meaning of this term denotes morally clean, undefiled, and free from corruption, closely overlapping with the idea of holiness though emphasizing freedom from moral stain. It is used in scripture to describe moral purity (1 Tim. 5:22), the sincere devotion of believers (2 Cor. 11:2), and the hope of becoming like Christ (1 John 3:3), setting before us a vision of untainted spiritual life. Purity is not merely the absence of outward defilement but a positive reflection of the unblemished character of Christ, whose spirit indwells the saints. What we post should steer clear of self-centeredness, pride, deceit, hostilities, double-mindedness, refusing to indulge in quarreling, innuendo, mockery, dissensions, even when confronting genuine error. Every post, indeed every argument, must proceed from a heart that is unconcerned with things like self-interest or the desire for validation, aiming instead for moral integrity and clarity and sincere devotion that mirrors the spirit of Christ.

5. What we post should be gracious (lovely).​

The word lovely (τὸ προσφιλές) refers to that which is pleasing, agreeable, and attractive, not in a superficial or sentimental sense but in the deeply moral sense of what is spiritually beautiful before God. Although this term appears only here in the New Testament, its usage suggests a focus on relational and ethical beauty—qualities that evoke godly affection, foster unity among believers, and reflect the holiness of Christ. True loveliness is not external charm or carnal appeal but the inner beauty produced by the Spirit, the kind of character that pleases God and knits hearts together in love. To center one's efforts on what is lovely is to set the mind on what builds harmony, inspires virtue, and draws attention to the excellence of Christ's character. This calls for our deliberate promotion of what is spiritually beautiful, namely, highlighting the goodness of sound doctrine, the redemptive work of God, and the virtues of the indwelling Spirit of Christ. Even in rebuke or correction, our words should be adorned with the fragrance of Christ, drawing others toward the beauty of holiness rather than repelling them through cynicism or harshness. Let your speech become a conduit for the grace that reflects the heart of God.

6. What we post should be above reproach (commendable).​

This refers to what is admirable, virtuous, worthy of being spoken well about, behavior or speech that glorifies God and edifies others, without either self-interest or self-preservation. The Greek roots of this term—eu ("good") and pheme ("speech")—and its ethical usage emphasize actions and words that are honorable, above reproach, and fitting for public commendation. This excludes things like gossip, slander, and sensationalism, embracing conduct that magnifies the beauty of Christ's character and strengthens the testimony of the church. Crafting posts that are commendable requires believers to dwell on those things that would not cause shame but rather inspire worship, integrity, and encouragement. This principle demands that our posts, arguments, and critiques be framed with integrity, worthy of being read aloud before the body of Christ without embarrassment or regret. Let your words be seasoned with grace, so that they bring honor to Christ and build up his church. Measure every contribution by this standard: "Would this, if made public, glorify God and strengthen his people?"

7. What we post should reflect divine virtue (excellent).​

True excellence of character is measured by God's standard, not by worldly acclaim. In the New Testament, ἀρετή (arete) is used more narrowly to describe the virtue that believers are to add to their faith (2 Pet. 1:5). Paul calls believers to dwell on that which embodies the highest moral quality, reflecting the character of Christ himself, who is the fullness of all virtue. Excellence here is not ambition, brilliance, or achievement as the world defines them but conformity to the righteousness and purity of God's will. To think on what is excellent is to prize what is morally radiant and spiritually mature, longing not merely for correct opinions but for Christ-like transformation. This calls for us to aim not merely at being right but indeed righteous, modeling excellence in tone, content, and purpose. Strive to post in a way that mirrors the beauty of holiness, refusing to settle for victory at the cost of virtue.

8. What we post should qualify for God's approval (praiseworthy).​

The apostle Paul calls believers to fix their minds on what is truly praiseworthy (ἔπαινος, epainos), which is not according to human applause but rather what God esteems. The term can broadly mean approval or commendation, but scripture consistently redirects our focus toward divine commendation (e.g., Rom. 2:29), where praise comes from God, even if not from man. Paul exhorts believers to fix their thoughts on what will survive the searching judgment of Christ, not what flatters human pride or garners fleeting applause. That which accords with God's revealed will and reflects the character of Christ is what's truly praiseworthy. To think and write in this way is to cultivate a conscience that is sensitive to God's approval, even when it invites the world's contempt. In discussions here, this means writing not for likes, validation, or popularity, but for the approval of God alone. Post as one who desires to hear, "Well done, good and faithful servant"—regardless of whether anyone else notices or approves.
 
Final Reflection – A Call to Sanctified Writing:

Paul's exhortation in Philippians 4:8 is grounded not in personal taste or cultural consensus but in the objective moral goods rooted in the Word and character of God. The command to "think about these things" summons believers to Spirit-led, truth-centered ethical meditation, curating their thoughts with the same reverence a priest gives to sacred offerings. These eight descriptors—truth, honor, justice, purity, loveliness, commendability, excellence, and praiseworthiness—form a unified moral vision shaped by the mind of Christ and attainable only by grace in a regenerated heart. In a culture awash with moral confusion and digital noise, the call is not merely to private contemplation but to disciplined mental holiness that overflows into speech, writing, and action. Forum discussions, therefore, must be treated as battlegrounds where every post either magnifies Christ or dishonors him. As participants, we are commanded to take every thought captive to make it obey Christ, speaking only what is true, honorable, just, pure, and gracious in his sight (coram Deo). Let your contributions reflect not the spirit of the age but the mind of Christ, formed and governed by the unchanging standard of scripture.

These are not humanly chosen values; they are God's, and they are binding.
 
NOTE: The preceding material was produced with the help of an AI machine learning model, which I consulted for assistance with the semantic range and contextual meaning of specific Koine Greek terms in this passage. I also made use of an online Greek-to-English translator.
 
NOTE: The preceding material was produced with the help of an AI machine learning model, which I consulted for assistance with the semantic range and contextual meaning of specific Koine Greek terms in this passage. I also made use of an online Greek-to-English translator.

Did you ever take any Koine courses in college? My husband took a semester or two and found it helpful.

For me I think it's helpful to know semitic languages and cultures. There's a flow of speech and culture that is not western and I think some westerners sometimes miss as a result.

I understand all the considerations logically I guess. But I'm not always sure if I follow what it should look like.

When we look at Jesus, He was absolutely offensive, and would have been considered highly arrogant (shockingly so at times). He was also God wrapped in flesh, so there's that.

Paul was softer, and others softer still, but the original disciples kept a hardness that Jesus had I think, and it did keep them separated from everything else I think.

All in all though, they all brought their own personalities and whatever focal impetus they individually thought was most important.

I just don't know what it's supposed to look like. I tried talking to people about faith but don't think I'm any good at it. I see myself as always coming up short and being always in the wrong in the how and imperfect and often imprecise.

Do you think it's supposed to be easy? Many things in life came naturally to me, this is not one.

When I feel most purely in the Spirit and most purely right before God, I seem mostly purely wrong to everyone else. I just don't know.

I am trying to learn though.

Oh, this can be deleted if you want.
 
Last edited:
Did you ever take any Koine courses in college? My husband took a semester or two and found it helpful.

No, I'm just a high school drop out who passed a GED test. I have a complicated history with formidable challenges that I had to overcome; privileges like a post-secondary education were not within my reach. (And even if it was, I'm not sure I would have been able to see it through.)

However, like you, I understand the importance of the history and culture behind the language of a given text, from the patriarchal era to first-century Judaism. Therefore, I have several textbooks related to Koine Greek, exegesis, and hermeneutics through which I have educated myself (e.g., Mounce's Basics of Biblical Greek textbook and workbook), not to mention my history textbooks and such. No formal education, but a committed autodidact.

Oh, and many online resources, like the one I shared above.

Side note for the readers: The term "koine" is a transliteration of the Greek word κοινή, which means "common." Therefore, what we're talking about is the Common Greek used in first-century Judaism and early Christianity, so any linguaphile will know what Hazelelponi meant when she asked, "Did you ever take any Common courses in college?"


I tried talking to people about faith but don't think I'm any good at it. I see myself as always coming up short and being always in the wrong [regarding] the how, and imperfect and often imprecise.

That is the great thing about our sovereign God: He has brought every single one of his children into a saving relationship with him through the witness and testimony of imperfect and imprecise people who were not always good at it. As the apostle Paul said, this is "so that your faith would not be based on human wisdom but on the power of God" (1 Cor 2:1-5).

That being said, don't sell yourself short. God has clearly gifted you at least in the form of writing, as anyone can see that you communicate with wonderful grace and clarity. That's not to say you never lose your cool—we all do, myself included—but let's focus on what builds each other up and encourage that.


Do you think it's supposed to be easy? Many things in life came naturally to me, this is not one.

It comes more naturally to some than others, for sure, but in every case it is always by the Spirit of Christ at work in us and through us as his ambassadors.


When I feel most purely in the Spirit and most purely right before God, I seem mostly purely wrong to everyone else. I just don't know.

I am trying to learn though.

Amen, and amen.
 

"Think about these things"—and write your post accordingly.​

Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is worthy of respect, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if something is excellent or praiseworthy, think about these things.
Forum discussions are not neutral spaces. Every word you type reveals your heart. In this epistle to the Philippians we have not so much a private meditation exercise as a discipleship imperative. It calls you to think, yes, but not merely to think. It summons believers to cultivate Spirit-wrought, disciplined holiness of mind by fixing their thoughts on the objective moral virtues of truth, honor, justice, purity, loveliness, commendability, excellence, and praiseworthiness—virtues grounded in God's unchanging character and revealed Word. This Spirit-enabled meditation, shaped by the mind of Christ, calls for the careful curation of thoughts and words with sacred reverence, rejecting the moral confusion of the age for the sake of Christ's glory in our speech, writing, and digital conduct. Forum discussions become arenas of spiritual warfare, where every word must be brought captive to the obedience of Christ and offered coram Deo, before the face of God. Participants are not free to mirror the spirit of the age but must speak from minds renewed by grace and governed by scripture. Let every contribution be a faithful echo of God's truth, flowing from hearts transformed by sovereign mercy.
Wow. Could you imagine if we all directed ours selfs as such?
 
No, I'm just a high school drop out who passed a GED test. I have a complicated history with formidable challenges that I had to overcome; privileges like a post-secondary education were not within my reach. (And even if it was, I'm not sure I would have been able to see it through.)
DITTO! May God continue to bless you as He has obviously been doing.
 
A couple of thoughts:

1) Commendable position with commendable support.

2) Will you consider adding Philippians 2:3-4 to this?

3) I am also curious about the truth aspect of this new rule, especially as articulated in Post #2. De facto speaking, internet discussion boards are filled with a diverse set of posters expressing diverse points of view, many of which cannot be true. A and not-A cannot possibly both be true at the same time. Therefore, to assert one or more of the posters is, by nature, posting unethically because they are posting falsehood is enormously problematic. Aside from the risk of ad hominem, it conflicts with Rule 2.1-2.2's requirements. The purpose of discussion and debate is to arrive at the truth, and to do so collaboratively, politely, respectfully, while specifically and intentionally keeping the posts about the posts, not the poster. I, therefore, wonder how, "You are behaving unethically because you're posting falsehood," would be something this forum will accept and promote. The search for, or assertion of, truth is particularly acute in any forum specifically intended to be apologetic. What defense of the faith (or any individual orthodox position) could exist without dissent, and I am not necessarily talking about heresy. I can cite several recent threads in this forum that asserted orthodox positions in general but were poorly executed in their particulars. How is an indictment of falsehood to be avoided in such circumstances? The Roman Catholic, the Eastern Orthodox, the Presbyterian, and the Dispensationalist all earnestly believe they are posting the truth, even when holding disparate views. Throw in a Jehovah's Witness, a Latter Day Saint, and a Christadelphian and that belief remains the same.

4) Of the forums I've been in that have attempted to address the problem I have cited, there exist homogenous boards in which like-minded people can discuss their theology without interference from others. Those forums stipulate that board is not for challenging those beliefs. One forum I know of calls them "safe houses," as is fairy diligent protecting the ability of those adherents to discuss their beliefs without interruption. Some viewpoints, like the commonly acknowledged heresies, do not have safe spaces, while others have two boards: one for honest inquiry and in-house discussion and another for critique and debate. Of course, one or two forums I know of are very unyielding and do not permit much if any dissent outside the specifics of the forum's statement of faith and terms of service/rules. Even when content is well mannered and respectful it is not permitted and those that post it may be permanently banned.
 
A couple of thoughts:

1) Commendable position with commendable support.

2) Will you consider adding Philippians 2:3-4 to this?

3) I am also curious about the truth aspect of this new rule, especially as articulated in Post #2. De facto speaking, internet discussion boards are filled with a diverse set of posters expressing diverse points of view, many of which cannot be true. A and not-A cannot possibly both be true at the same time. Therefore, to assert one or more of the posters is, by nature, posting unethically because they are posting falsehood is enormously problematic. Aside from the risk of ad hominem, it conflicts with Rule 2.1-2.2's requirements. The purpose of discussion and debate is to arrive at the truth, and to do so collaboratively, politely, respectfully, while specifically and intentionally keeping the posts about the posts, not the poster. I, therefore, wonder how, "You are behaving unethically because you're posting falsehood," would be something this forum will accept and promote. The search for, or assertion of, truth is particularly acute in any forum specifically intended to be apologetic. What defense of the faith (or any individual orthodox position) could exist without dissent, and I am not necessarily talking about heresy. I can cite several recent threads in this forum that asserted orthodox positions in general but were poorly executed in their particulars. How is an indictment of falsehood to be avoided in such circumstances? The Roman Catholic, the Eastern Orthodox, the Presbyterian, and the Dispensationalist all earnestly believe they are posting the truth, even when holding disparate views. Throw in a Jehovah's Witness, a Latter Day Saint, and a Christadelphian and that belief remains the same.

4) Of the forums I've been in that have attempted to address the problem I have cited, there exist homogenous boards in which like-minded people can discuss their theology without interference from others. Those forums stipulate that board is not for challenging those beliefs. One forum I know of calls them "safe houses," as is fairy diligent protecting the ability of those adherents to discuss their beliefs without interruption. Some viewpoints, like the commonly acknowledged heresies, do not have safe spaces, while others have two boards: one for honest inquiry and in-house discussion and another for critique and debate. Of course, one or two forums I know of are very unyielding and do not permit much if any dissent outside the specifics of the forum's statement of faith and terms of service/rules. Even when content is well mannered and respectful it is not permitted and those that post it may be permanently banned.
Imteresting to say the least! I was on a pro-Arminian site that was rude so I left. Years ago I was apparently blocked from a Calvinist site for not believing in corporal punishment. I should be of no opinion.
 
I should be of no opinion.
LOL! I get it. I was permanently banned from The Puritan Board simply because when I signed up I voluntarily acknowledged I was an annihilationist in the vein of John Stott but otherwise wholly agreed to their statement of faith. I never posted a single word about annihilation. Not once. Posted there for many months without a single complaint and then one day when I went to sign in I received notification I'd been banned for subscribing to annihilation. It did not matter that the point of view falls within the spectrum of mainstream Reformed thinking, and it did not matter that I assertively defended the Reformed position in many topics, and it did not matter that I had posted well for many months with positive effect. Someone, apparently, checked my admission content and that was it. poof no more josh

....and as to the Dispensationalist run boards.... 😖😖😖😖😖
 
LOL! I get it. I was permanently banned from The Puritan Board simply because when I signed up I voluntarily acknowledged I was an annihilationist in the vein of John Stott but otherwise wholly agreed to their statement of faith. I never posted a single word about annihilation. Not once. Posted there for many months without a single complaint and then one day when I went to sign in I received notification I'd been banned for subscribing to annihilation. It did not matter that the point of view falls within the spectrum of mainstream Reformed thinking, and it did not matter that I assertively defended the Reformed position in many topics, and it did not matter that I had posted well for many months with positive effect. Someone, apparently, checked my admission content and that was it. poof no more josh

....and as to the Dispensationalist run boards.... 😖😖😖😖😖

I went to sign up at the puritan boards, they wouldn't let me join because I didn't know the creeds yet and couldn't tell them what ones I affirmed.

Lol.. told me to come back when I knew the creeds.
 
I went to sign up at the puritan boards, they wouldn't let me join because I didn't know the creeds yet and couldn't tell them what ones I affirmed.

Lol.. told me to come back when I knew the creeds.
I still lurk there. It's filled with posts referencing Reformed theologians.
 
I still lurk there. It's filled with posts referencing Reformed theologians.

Me too but I refuse to join now... Clearly, ye ole religious theologian is the kind they want, and it's probably not me.
 
Ach du lieber! I don't know why that popped into my head. I was starting to think I must be from another planet.
 
Will you consider adding Philippians 2:3-4 to this?

While reading her Bible, my wife came across Philippians 4:8 and our discussion about its meaning got me thinking about its broader implications, thoughts which eventually led to that opening post. I am sure there are several passages that are relevant to this theme—Philippians 2:3-4 certainly comes to mind—but since our conversation focused on this one verse, that is where I chose to concentrate.


I am also curious about the truth aspect of this new rule, …

This is not a new rule. It's just a think piece. A personal reflection on how Christians should approach online discussions. Just something to think about. That's all.


To assert that [people are] posting unethically because they are posting falsehood is enormously problematic.

As a Christian living in the 21st century, I am accustomed to nearly everything I say or do being labeled as "problematic."

And I couldn't care less.

Moreover, my opening post was directed at fellow Christians who, presumably, would be concerned that their conduct reflects the character of Christ, glorifies God, and edifies one another.

Those who don't share those concerns—and there are so many—my post was not for them.
 
Me too but I refuse to join now... Clearly, ye ole religious theologian is the kind they want, and it's probably not me.
Some folks don't want the kind of debate present in forums with diverse membership. That's okay with me if that is clear before signing up. Forums with diverse membership and unregulated discourse are chaotic (and often toxic). I cut my forum teeth on Craigslist's religious forum (affectionately called "refo" by its members). It's barely regulated at all. As a consequence, the forum is simply fodder for antitheists to abuse theists. Being new to the internet, I had no idea other kinds of forums existed. I was overjoyed to find CARM and Christian Forums. So, if the Puritan-minded Christians want to have an in-house board to discuss a limited spectrum of views among like-minded individuals I hold nothing against them. I happen to like a certain diversity of thought. Keeps me on my toes and sharpens my wit :cool:.
 
[MOD EDIT: Removed deleted content.]


We all have flaws in our thinking, but do I really want my flaws accepted if they are bad flaws? No... I should want my flaws to change, and be accepted personally for the good that I am.

^^ right?

As Christians we are on a journey of becoming the people we are meant to be in Christ. It's a journey of finding our flaws and correcting them as time goes on.

We find out what our flaws are from Scripture - as Christians - and call for both ourselves and others to conform themselves (thinking and actions) to that Scripture, starting with belief in Christ and continuing on through even how we arrange church government.

You are judging as much or more as @Carbon or any moderator here - but the question is are you using Scripture to judge?

If you are sure your beliefs conform to Scripture why not argue them out in the full light of Scripture amongst Christian brethren (no one is perfect, starting with self).

If you're sure they don't conform to Scripture why care what the people of the Scripture think?

I spent the larger portion of my life not caring in the least what the judgemental Christians thought about anything. When I finally cared what they thought, I had reason for caring.

God's speaking through the situation don't you suppose? Maybe you should find out what He's saying.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[MOD EDIT: Removed deleted content.]
I grew up with non-Christian judgmental people. I was not allowed to have friends at home, so it's hard for me to make small talk, but I don't have transportation to church so I spend a lot of time online. I'm not so sure that Christians condemn others by disagreeing. I think disagreements are to be expected, but that doesn't give us license to hate others. There's a difference between hating false teachings and hating the people who follow them. If you are unhappy here look for another site. Some of us have very strong convictions and have to not argue a lot with others, especially at church. The important thing is to read the Bible a lot and attempt to please God. The Bible tells us what God expects of us. Back when I could go to church, I was very quiet. So were a lot of others. I'm sorry you're unhappy and hope you can experience some peace soon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I grew up with non-Christian judgmental people. I was not allowed to have friends at home, so it's hard for me to make small talk, but I don't have transportation to church so I spend a lot of time online. I'm not so sure that Christians condemn others by disagreeing. I think disagreements are to be expected, but that doesn't give us license to hate others. There's a difference between hating false teachings and hating the people who follow them. If you are unhappy here look for another site. Some of us have very strong convictions and have to not argue a lot with others, especially at church. The important thing is to read the Bible a lot and attempt to please God. The Bible tells us what God expects of us. Back when I could go to church, I was very quiet. So were a lot of others. I'm sorry you're unhappy and hope you can experience some peace soon.
I should chill out and I know it. The craziness I went through at a historic church I attended was - crazy. The Church 'moderator' I think she was called stood by the pastor when he was clearly out of line. This pastor said that he can cite as many acts of 'Christian terrorism' as I could Islamic terrorism. The very day he said that 70 Christians were murdered in Uganda by Islamic terror group.

The bad news is that the bad news is hidden from most of us. Did you know a little over 3 weeks ago this occurred and it's being covered up.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Kasanga Massacre occurred on 12 February 2025, when Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) militants entered the village of Mayba in Lubero Territory, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo and abducted at least 70 Christian civilians. The captives were subsequently taken to a Protestant church in Kasanga, North Kivu, where they were beheaded via machetes. Their bodies were discovered on 14 February 2025.

The United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) considers the reports of the massacre as "unverified", while Vatican News described the reports as "confirmed".
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

70 Christians beheaded in African country by ISIS-aligned militants, groups say; world mostly silent​

Here we have believers in Jesus Christ who condemn other believers over a controversial doctrine that only divides and look at what's going on in the world.
 
Back
Top