Josheb
Well Known Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2023
- Messages
- 4,904
- Reaction score
- 2,149
- Points
- 113
- Location
- VA, south of DC
- Faith
- Yes
- Marital status
- Married with adult children
- Politics
- Conservative
I did see it and you should not wrongly imagine I did not see it because of my silence. You will do better sticking to the topic and not inventing falsehoods about others.Why did not our friend Josheb see this?
What a snotty, other-impugning, self-aggrandizing thing to post. Please keep the posts about the posts, not the posters. Note the comments I can made were evidenced, and evidenced by content specifically and explicitly found in the posts. When you have proof I did not see something and need help then post it, and until them keep the comments about others to yourself. This is important because these posts do the exact same thing with scripture: things not in evidence are assumed, not evidenced and not proven. That, not the faculties of others or their lack thereof, will prove fatal to the op.Thank you for watching after him, he needs a little help.
I do not care because anecdotal personal experience is worthless in the absence of objective proof.Btw, I, at one point back in the seventies, believed....
No, you are not. None of the fallacies have been addressed, and Post 20 was just wasted with ad hominem, subjective experience, and non sequiturs.I'm almost ready to put my sword and harness off ~ a well worn one at that ~ It is still good for a few more battles I'm sure, we shall see.
From beginning to end, the seven or eight posts have begged the question, not proven it, and treated the begged position as if it is the default setting and the given in all examples except for a possible minority. In doing so the first rule of exegesis has been violated over and over, again and again - ignored is if it is not the default position! Nothing else you post will make any difference if the problem of begging the question, assuming facts not in evidence and treating what needs to be proved as a given, is not solved. While you are at it, before putting away your "sword and harness," address the problem of missing categories, like temporal markers and dispositional markers.