• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

Josheb vs John Bauer (11 Jan 2026)

John Bauer

DialecticSkeptic
Staff member
Joined
Jun 19, 2023
Messages
1,531
Reaction score
2,631
Points
133
Age
47
Location
Canada
Faith
Reformed (URCNA)
Country
Canada
Marital status
Married
Politics
Kingdom of God
It is the equivalent of saying, “I do not believe in choices, but I do believe the definition of ‘choice’ exists.” That is self-contradictory. I have cited multiple occasions in which contradictions exist. Not one of them has been corrected.

There may be a good reason why the contradictions he has identified haven’t been corrected. Take this one as an example. Just because he called something self-contradictory doesn’t mean it is—and this one is not.

Consider a substitution: “I do not believe in Santa Claus, but I do believe the definition of ‘Santa Claus’ exists.” It should be immediately obvious that this is not self-contradictory. This assertion merely distinguishes between a concept and its instantiation. It is coherent to say, “The term Santa Claus is definable within our language or conceptual scheme, but nothing in reality answers to it.”
 
There may be a good reason why the contradictions he has identified haven’t been corrected. Take this one as an example. Just because he called something self-contradictory doesn’t mean it is—and this one is not.

Consider a substitution: “I do not believe in Santa Claus, but I do believe the definition of ‘Santa Claus’ exists.” It should be immediately obvious that this is not self-contradictory. This assertion merely distinguishes between a concept and its instantiation. It is coherent to say, “The term Santa Claus is definable within our language or conceptual scheme, but nothing in reality answers to it.”
Not to mention that @Josheb defines choice according to THE DICTIONARY, and not according to the whole reason for the OP from which this contention descended. It was written (among other related things) to demonstrate that the Dictionary definition and/or the human POV from which the dictionary defines things is not sufficient.

When I say, "The dictionary is wrong/ not sufficient/ is humanly derived and not defining words according to God's POV which is THE ONLY TRUTH in the end, he may as well have said, "The dictionary says choice is between two or more possibilities so you are wrong."
 
Last edited:
Notice that @Josheb keeps equating 'choice' with 'possibility' with 'option'. As I remember, anyway, he pretty much uses 'option' and 'possibility' as meaning the same thing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top