That is short-sighted and yet unknown. Many saw the judge's decision as an example of partisan jurisprudence, if not also partisan politics. We have a huge problem in this country. The rule of law is supposed to be objective or "blind." It is to concern itself solely with the specific of the law and not personal or political concerns. Currently, if a leftist wants a favorable outcome they file in a liberal district and, likewise, if a conservative wants a favorable outcome, then they file in a conservative district. The fact that such things exist is an abject failure of sound jurisprudence. Ideally, all courts should rule uniformly on all matters and that condition does not exist anywhere. Had Trump's New York trials been had in Florida, Idaho, or South Dakota.... well, those cases would never have been brought to trial.
This remains a huge issue.
Those who view Trump as an arrogant, narcissistic rule-breaker see the dismissal as one more example of unjust jurisprudence, firmly believing he is still guilty and if the law is given the opportunity to prove it that is exactly what will happen. They will vote accordingly come November, especially in light of recent SCOTUS decisions. Those who see the prosecution as persecution, or "lawfare," may feel relieved (and justified) temporarily, and they'll vote accordingly come November in hopes the use of lawfare will be eradicated. In the interim Trump is fee to campaign, which means we'll continue to see the subterfuge of the media on a daily basis, only now it will be on the campaign trail, not the courtroom (which is where cons would prefer it and libs not so much).
Furthermore, the standards for POTUSes handling secret and secure documents have still not been addressed or decided.
For these reasons and others, this remains a huge issue.
Yes, but those same people already have tried and found him guilty of Fani Willis' RICO charges in GA.
And those same people already have tried and found him guilty of Jan 6 charges in DC.
And those same people will say he was found guilty and there will remain guilty in the hush money case in New York, even if... which is highly doubtful Merchan would dismiss the case after the SCOTUS immunity ruling... and even if it goes on to appeal and he would win there
the fact that 12 people found him guilty while sitting in court.... therefore he is.
And those same people already have agreed with the guilty verdict in his civil fraud case and the certain proof of guilt is the bond he had to put up waiting for appeal. He IS guilty.
And those same people already have tried and found him guilty of rape... YES RAPE, CAUSE YOU HEAR IT ALL THE TIME... because
E. Jean Carroll said she was raped in the mid 1990s....and NY gave a window of opportunity of 1 year to former sex victims past statute of limitations, to bring a charge. So
A Manhattan federal jury found that Donald
Trump sexually abused HER... NOT RAPED.
But MSM , not happy with his fine, still said things like Washington Posts ... What the jury found Donald
Trump did to E. Jean Carroll was in fact
rape,
as commonly understood, even if it didn't fit New York law's narrow definition, says Judge Lewis
A. Kaplan.
All happening in a woman's dressing room in Bergdorf Goodman Dept Store in NY.
So we have a population of folks that say he is guilty of all.
We have those who say the hush money business records guilty charges.. awaiting sentencing... is enough that they will not vote for him.
so at this point that anything that can delay any more rush to trials until after the election... the better.
Because he WILL be found guilty of the docs charge. St. Biden gets a pass
He will be found guilty on the Rico charges.
And he will be found guilty on J 6.
Even after being shot the other day and he raised his fist and said to the people fight, fight, fight I am waiting for someone to charge him with causing the death of that boy that was trying to kill him....
. I'll see you all in a few minutes with a new keyboard 
