Sure, I'm game!I would like to invite people from this section over to the Oneness section to discuss a version of the Trinity that caters to verses used by Oneness Pentecostals and yet does not deny distinctions between the members of the Godhead.
[hateful and unnecessary comment deleted by mod]Sure, I'm game!
click on the link.Where's your post ?
Can you repost the link?click on the link.
Sure.Can you repost the link?
I would need one more agreement; to have a Dialectic Debate. I don't want to be involved in a one-sided Debate...[hateful and unnecessary comment deleted by mod]
I will consider your arguments and your point of view; that is all that I am going to promise.I would need one more agreement; to have a Dialectic Debate. I don't want to be involved in a one-sided Debate...
I'll give you an example of what I consider a Dialectic Debate, a conversation I had with someone elsewhere. First, our agreement on what a Dialectic is, needs to be established; so Fouls can be called. Boxing you in, boxes me in too...I will consider your arguments and your point of view; that is all that I am going to promise.
But you can be certain that I am going to present the arguments that support my side of the issue.
Amen, right...The just shall live by faith, we are saved by faith. Genuine faith is not filthy rags and God does not believe for me right ?
The above in red and bracketed are themselves unnecessary and hateful and are a misstatement of Calvinist doctrine. Which I will not address at it is off topic to the thread. By rights they should be deleted but I will leave them up so you know what they are. There are better ways to express your opinions on something than in the language you used. Come from knowledge of what you are speaking about, support of your view, and a way to refute what the other person says, instead of from emotional reactions. And keep it in the right forum subject.I think that it is unnecessary and hateful to identify one of my comments as unnecessary and hateful. { I do have emotional reactions to the doctrines of Calvinism because I believe them to identify the God that I love as a satanic being; the god of Calvinism is not the same God as the God that I find in the Bible; who died for my sins and gives me a choice in the matter of whether or not I will receive Him and be saved or else reject Him and be damned. A God of love does not arbitrarily cast some into the lake of fire through no fault of their own but solely based on his sovereign decision that he will condemn them eternally.} People are cast into the lake of fire for breaking God's laws; and because they do not subsequently receive the forgiveness offered by Christ concerning their violations. Those who go to hell have no one but themselves to blame. {God did not arbitrarily send them there;} they sent themselves there by rejecting the forgiveness that was offered to them by Christ.
However I have no idea whatsoever of what I might have said within the topic of the Trinity that might have been identified as unnecessary and hateful. {Unless this is just another slander by satan against one of God's true servants as it is par for the course that when we serve the Lord and preach sound doctrine, that he will find some way to bring disparagement on our testimony.}
