Theology interview questions?

[Carbon]

Searching the web I came across this:
Cambridge interview questions?

Over 1000 past questions to help you prepare for your interview and get into Cambridge

Interesting. Here is one question.

Which of the arguments for the existence of God is the most convincing?


Thoughts?

 

[Fred]

The Bible says so.

 

[Deleted member 5]

The Bible says so

Genesis 1:1.

 

[Fred]

Creation (Romans 1)
Conscience (Romans 2)
Christ (Romans 3)

 

[CCShorts]

Searching the web I came across this:
Cambridge interview questions?

Over 1000 past questions to help you prepare for your interview and get into Cambridge

Interesting. Here is one question.

Which of the arguments for the existence of God is the most convincing?


Thoughts?

Although I believe the Bible is the “most convincing” to those already believing…

According to the biblical concept that the heavens declare the glory of God and His power can be clearly seen in the things that have been made, the argument from design, also known as the teleological argument, can be considered the “most convincing” argument for the existence of God on a universal scale.

The teleological argument suggests that the intricate order, complexity, and purposeful design observed in the natural world imply the existence of an intelligent designer, creator, sustainer. This argument points to the remarkable precision and interdependence found in biological systems, the fine-tuning of the universe, and the beauty and harmony of nature as evidence for a divine mind behind creation.

When we contemplate the majesty of the universe, the complexity of living organisms, or even the delicate balance of ecosystems, we are confronted with the awe-inspiring intricacies of design. The intricacy and order we observe in nature suggest a level of purpose and intentionality that is difficult to attribute solely to chance or merely natural processes.

As the Bible states in Psalm 19:1, "The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." This verse emphasizes that through nature, God's power and glory are revealed. The intricate design and order found in creation point to the existence of a transcendent Creator, who is responsible for bringing forth and sustaining the universe.

Therefore, when considering the most convincing argument for the existence of God within the biblical framework, the teleological argument stands out. By recognizing the beauty, complexity, and purposeful design of the natural world, we can perceive the handiwork of a divine Creator, and His existence can be inferred from the evidence presented in nature.

…

 

[Deleted member 5]

Although I believe the Bible is the “most convincing” to those already believing…

According to the biblical concept that the heavens declare the glory of God and His power can be clearly seen in the things that have been made, the argument from design, also known as the teleological argument, can be considered the “most convincing” argument for the existence of God on a universal scale.

The teleological argument suggests that the intricate order, complexity, and purposeful design observed in the natural world imply the existence of an intelligent designer, creator, sustainer. This argument points to the remarkable precision and interdependence found in biological systems, the fine-tuning of the universe, and the beauty and harmony of nature as evidence for a divine mind behind creation.

When we contemplate the majesty of the universe, the complexity of living organisms, or even the delicate balance of ecosystems, we are confronted with the awe-inspiring intricacies of design. The intricacy and order we observe in nature suggest a level of purpose and intentionality that is difficult to attribute solely to chance or merely natural processes.

As the Bible states in Psalm 19:1, "The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." This verse emphasizes that through nature, God's power and glory are revealed. The intricate design and order found in creation point to the existence of a transcendent Creator, who is responsible for bringing forth and sustaining the universe.

Therefore, when considering the most convincing argument for the existence of God within the biblical framework, the teleological argument stands out. By recognizing the beauty, complexity, and purposeful design of the natural world, we can perceive the handiwork of a divine Creator, and His existence can be inferred from the evidence presented in nature.

…

But all that is "Bible" too.

 

[CCShorts]

But all that is "Bible" too.

As an “already believing” one I agree.

Tell that to the Evolutionists.

“The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”” (Psa 14:1)

…

 

[atpollard]

"The problem of evil" utterly crushes any "teleological argument". As a former atheist, this is a matter that I gave no small investment of thought into. Ultimately there are two irreconcilable truths:

• Creation has a creator (order comes from some source ... the argument about finding a watch on a tree stump in the woods: it didn't just create itself).
• This "creator" does nothing to stop evil.

There are several "logical explanations", but not an infinite number of possibilities:

1. God is unaware of the evil [God is not omniscient].
2. God is somewhere else at the moment the evil occurs [God is not omnipresent].
3. God is unable to stop the evil [God is not omnipotent].
4. God is able to stop the evil and chooses to do nothing. [God is a monster.]

If one accept answers 1, 2 or 3, then God is not GOD [by the definition of God as an omni- being]. One must then embrace either a "god" (little "g") or atheism.

If one accepts that GOD EXISTS, that only leaves option 4 ... God is evil. Capable of ending suffering and choosing to watch suffering and do nothing about it. If a human being stood at the edge of a pool and watched toddlers walk in and drown as he chose to do nothing about it but simply watch them drown ... what would you think of that person? How is God less so than that person?

So there is the real choice: GOD is evil or GOD is not real [not OMNISCIENT, OMNIPOTENT, OMNIPRESENT]. I chose atheism as easier to believe than a God that is evil.

YOU (evangelists) deserve to know exactly what you are fighting against when you attempt to reach an atheist.

So the question:
Which of the arguments for the existence of God is the most convincing?

I am ignorant of the philosophy of theological circles on this matter. My experience comes from the street and empirical examples. So what is the name for the argument that goes like this:

• Moses has given up on his old life and his people when a VOICE FROM A BURNING BUSH calls to him and Moses encounters I AM in a way that he cannot deny or explain away. So Moses follows and obeys from that moment forward.
• Saul is riding on a dusty road with his orders in his hand empowering him to destroy those who profane the name of I AM with lies and blasphemy, when JESUS APPEARS and knocks him to the ground, blinds him with the GLORY OF GOD and in an instant transforms everything that Saul knew to be true. So Paul follows and obeys from that moment forward.

Whatever clever theological name they have, THAT is the most convincing argument for the existence of God.

 

[Deleted member 5]

As an “already believing” one I agree.

Yes, I agree. Yet Romans 1 indictment and revelation isn't limited only to believers. We would have no clue of the heavens declaring the glory of God without the revelation of it via the word IMHO.

Psalms 19 talks about it revealing the glory of God, not merely that there is God. All men are then without excuse as per Romans 1, thus the "unbelieving" ones are under God's indictment of a righteous coming day of judgment upon them.

Tell that to the Evolutionists.

lol!

“The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”” (Psa 14:1)

…

I heard it said that the text should read "The fool says in his heart, No, God!" I'm not certain of the veracity of that interpretation though.

 

[ReverendRV]

Searching the web I came across this:
Cambridge interview questions?

Over 1000 past questions to help you prepare for your interview and get into Cambridge

Interesting. Here is one question.

Which of the arguments for the existence of God is the most convincing?


Thoughts?

The Veracity of the Bible..

 

[fastfredy0]

Which of the arguments for the existence of God is the most convincing?

None ... sort of ....

1 Cor. 2:14 But the natural [unbelieving] man does not accept the things [the teachings and revelations] of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness [absurd and illogical] to him; and he is incapable of understanding them, because they are spiritually discerned and appreciated, [and he is unqualified to judge spiritual matters].

.... so, the Spirit zapped me (regenerated) and that was the argument I accepted for the existence of God

 

[CrazyCalvinistUncle]

Which of the arguments for the existence of God is the most convincing?

The absence of God reduces all things too unintelligibility and absurdity. Without God this very conversation has no more meaning that waves crashing on the sky somewhere in the land of Purple.

 

[Bluedragon]

For a moment ......erase the Bible. erase history ......erase your knowledge ......Open your eyes and think .....

Why am I here? Where did I come from? What is the reason for me to desire the need to acquire this knowledge? Who created me?

No small wonder there are multiple religions of the world. The desire to know our creator is already within us.

I had to take Religions of the World as a degree requirement. The Professor began the course this way .....

The final exam included things we learned about different religions ......then concluded

What did you learn about the creation of the Bible and the impact Christianity has had on the world?