EarlyActs
Well Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2023
- Messages
- 3,448
- Reaction score
- 398
- Points
- 83
We know from the apostles that the victory of Isaiah 25, even though cast in terms about Jerusalem and neighbors, was the Gospel event of the death and resurrection.
This usage is no different from Jesus' reply to Judaism's leaders about the temple 'Tear down this temple, and I will rebuild it in three days.' He is Christocentric, and he taught that to the disciples in the 40 days.
Actually, one view of v24 is that it is about destroyed Jerusalem no longer being a foreigner's stronghold. In other words, just as the icon of Israel's history is decimated, Isaiah announces the huge victory of God for his people: the removal of the shroud of death over all nations.
On this mountain the Lord Almighty will prepare
a feast of rich food for all peoples,
a banquet of aged wine—
the best of meats and the finest of wines.
7 On this mountain he will destroy
the shroud that enfolds all peoples,
the sheet that covers all nations;
8 he will swallow up death forever.
The Sovereign Lord will wipe away the tears
from all faces;
he will remove his people’s disgrace
from all the earth.
he will remove his people’s disgrace
from all the earth.
The Lord has spoken.
9 In that day they will say,
“Surely this is our God;
we trusted in him, and he saved us.
This is the Lord, we trusted in him;
let us rejoice and be glad in his salvation.”
People may think there is something amiss, here or that the Bible is saying two divergent things at once. But a study of the OT quotes of the NT show that numerous metaphors are used about Christ, to preach him to the nations.
There is a fake issue out there about a 'spiritual' meaning. Spirituality in Christ is a good thing; the fake issue is about metaphor vs literal usage. Well, metaphors about Christ from OT passages are a good thing too!
The Bible clarifies this in Hebrews (written to the Hebrews), that we have come to one mountain (heaven's) and not another (earth's or Judaism's).
The Bible is not teach two divergent programs at once; that would cause serious headaches. It is incoherent. The passage is not saying one mountain on all the earth is where everyone must come for proper worship of God for the Gospel over death which he provided. The mountain them is used in the prophets to designate a vast, established place, but they don't mean one particular hill geographically. This is why Jesus said as much in Jn 4 to the Samaritan woman, who, by the way, subscribed to another mountain for worship from Jews; that was not a particularly smart card to play to the true Messiah!
I once stepped into a church which had just finished a study of Jn 2 and the 'destroy this temple' passage, I was there to pick up someone. When I learned to topic of the night was 'I will rebuild it in 3 days' I exclaimed that it was a theme-setting passage. The pastor immediately told me that if I thought there would not be a literal temple in the future in Israel, that I was to leave the building. He had managed to 'explain away' a 'problem' passage for his view. He did allow me to meet the child at the kids program. But really, it was quite a welcome!
This usage is no different from Jesus' reply to Judaism's leaders about the temple 'Tear down this temple, and I will rebuild it in three days.' He is Christocentric, and he taught that to the disciples in the 40 days.
Actually, one view of v24 is that it is about destroyed Jerusalem no longer being a foreigner's stronghold. In other words, just as the icon of Israel's history is decimated, Isaiah announces the huge victory of God for his people: the removal of the shroud of death over all nations.
On this mountain the Lord Almighty will prepare
a feast of rich food for all peoples,
a banquet of aged wine—
the best of meats and the finest of wines.
7 On this mountain he will destroy
the shroud that enfolds all peoples,
the sheet that covers all nations;
8 he will swallow up death forever.
The Sovereign Lord will wipe away the tears
from all faces;
he will remove his people’s disgrace
from all the earth.
he will remove his people’s disgrace
from all the earth.
The Lord has spoken.
9 In that day they will say,
“Surely this is our God;
we trusted in him, and he saved us.
This is the Lord, we trusted in him;
let us rejoice and be glad in his salvation.”
People may think there is something amiss, here or that the Bible is saying two divergent things at once. But a study of the OT quotes of the NT show that numerous metaphors are used about Christ, to preach him to the nations.
There is a fake issue out there about a 'spiritual' meaning. Spirituality in Christ is a good thing; the fake issue is about metaphor vs literal usage. Well, metaphors about Christ from OT passages are a good thing too!
The Bible clarifies this in Hebrews (written to the Hebrews), that we have come to one mountain (heaven's) and not another (earth's or Judaism's).
The Bible is not teach two divergent programs at once; that would cause serious headaches. It is incoherent. The passage is not saying one mountain on all the earth is where everyone must come for proper worship of God for the Gospel over death which he provided. The mountain them is used in the prophets to designate a vast, established place, but they don't mean one particular hill geographically. This is why Jesus said as much in Jn 4 to the Samaritan woman, who, by the way, subscribed to another mountain for worship from Jews; that was not a particularly smart card to play to the true Messiah!
I once stepped into a church which had just finished a study of Jn 2 and the 'destroy this temple' passage, I was there to pick up someone. When I learned to topic of the night was 'I will rebuild it in 3 days' I exclaimed that it was a theme-setting passage. The pastor immediately told me that if I thought there would not be a literal temple in the future in Israel, that I was to leave the building. He had managed to 'explain away' a 'problem' passage for his view. He did allow me to meet the child at the kids program. But really, it was quite a welcome!