Carbon
Admin
- Joined
- May 19, 2023
- Messages
- 6,246
- Reaction score
- 5,926
- Points
- 138
- Location
- New England
- Faith
- Reformed
- Country
- USA
- Marital status
- Married
- Politics
- Conservative
Sorry.Is this a trivial pursuit question ?
Can I have a poll ?
![]()
Ah, 'cause God loved Lazarus and the rich man was inconsequential. (potential dissertation in this)Why was Lazarus named but not the rich man?
Because it was a symbolic teaching, not literal.Why was Lazarus named but not the rich man?
It isn’t symbolic when a proper name is mentioned.Because it was a symbolic teaching, not literal.
I think the question might be.....In parables those mentioned are not named. The widow, a certain man, the land owner.....why is Lazarus mentioned by name?Why was Lazarus named but not the rich man?
This could be the exception where both are true- its both a parable and a true story. As I always like to say there are exceptions to the rules.I think the question might be.....In parables those mentioned are not named. The widow, a certain man, the land owner.....why is Lazarus mentioned by name?
Good point.I think the question might be.....In parables those mentioned are not named. The widow, a certain man, the land owner.....why is Lazarus mentioned by name?
Parables are based upon actual events or events that could actually happen.This could be the exception where both are true- its both a parable and a true story. As I always like to say there are exceptions to the rules.![]()
Could it just be this was a real event, Lazarus was a real person named and he saw and spoke with Abraham also a real person .What evidence is there that this is a parable? Many claim it is but I ask based on what? In many parables in the text we are told they are parables In this story of Lazaurus we are not told it is a parable and men are called by name. I am convicted this is not a parable.I think the question might be.....In parables those mentioned are not named. The widow, a certain man, the land owner.....why is Lazarus mentioned by name?
I see no reason why it couldn't be a real person.Could it just be this was a real event, Lazarus was a real person named and he saw and spoke with Abraham also a real person .What evidence is there that this is a parable? Many claim it is but I ask based on what? In many parables in the text we are told they are parables In this story of Lazaurus we are not told it is a parable and men are called by name. I am convicted this is not a parable.
Many who deny the existence of a real place of torment have to make this a parable just to support their doctrine.
Perhaps the answer lies in the meaning of Lazarus - "God is my help"?Why was Lazarus named but not the rich man?
Yes it is.It isn’t symbolic when a proper name is mentioned.
No its not! Now that is solved.Yes it is.
For once you and I are in agreement about something.Because it was a symbolic teaching, not literal.
Gods justice makes it not a reality. But symbolism. God taught all perfect justice= An eye for an eye-perfect balance on his scales. So for 70-100 years of an unrepented life God could not or would not punish one for trillions x trillions x trillions, etc of never ending years of suffering for that. There is no balance in that. It was symbolism for the following--- As each new day dawns in Gods kingdom( eternal life) those not allowed in, miss each new day, miss each day of Gods love, it NEVER ends--likened to be an eternal suffering.No its not! Now that is solved.
Could you explain why you believe what you stated as fact?
Can I assume you do not believe in a literal hell (place of torment)?