The Left's reconstruction of reality

[EarlyActs]

"The Left has no moral compass. Classes or groups are good or bad, not actions by people. The white person cannot be good; the black person cannot be bad. It is sick." --Prager.

This is the reconstruction of reality that began in the French Revolution; see my doc Be Careful What You Wish For at youtube.

 

[Yttrium]

This sounds like overgeneralization and demonization. Sure, you can find some who are like that, but it isn't a general policy. In fact, the Left does have a strong moral compass to aid the needy (something Jesus was big on) and promote civil rights. How they go about it can be very questionable at times, but a lot of them mean well.

How is this an apologetics and not a political topic?

 

[EarlyActs]

This sounds like overgeneralization and demonization. Sure, you can find some who are like that, but it isn't a general policy. In fact, the Left does have a strong moral compass to aid the needy (something Jesus was big on) and promote civil rights. How they go about it can be very questionable at times, but a lot of them mean well.

How is this an apologetics and not a political topic?

I put it in apologetics because categorism is highly multi-disciplinary. It is transformational Marxism, believing that all issues are a matter of class-race-pedigree-gender, not individual's actions vis-a-vis the law. There are countless examples of proceeding this way in the West for the past 2 decades--decisions not made on acts done, but on categories, even legal decisions, and villifying 'meritocracy'. It seems to have got its greatest boost when Clinton tried to make mortgage qualification based on race-class quotas, but Obama did so much more.

The 'mean well' argument is not worthwhile. We must be guided by actual effects and results. Does no one realize what financial undertow means when principle is being taxed so much that there is runaway national debt, which the current admin believes is a sign of leadership?