• **Notifications**: Notifications can be dismissed by clicking on the "x" on the righthand side of the notice.
  • **New Style**: You can now change style options. Click on the paintbrush at the bottom of this page.
  • **Donations**: If the Lord leads you please consider helping with monthly costs and up keep on our Forum. Click on the Donate link In the top menu bar. Thanks
  • **New Blog section**: There is now a blog section. Check it out near the Private Debates forum or click on the Blog link in the top menu bar.
  • Welcome Visitors! Join us and be blessed while fellowshipping and celebrating our Glorious Salvation In Christ Jesus.

The Immoral & Mental Disease of Transgender-ism

Buff Scott Jr.

Sophomore
Joined
Jul 31, 2023
Messages
477
Reaction score
135
Points
43
The Immoral & Mental Disease of
“Transgender-ism”


[How to discover if you’re biologically Male or Female]
It’s a total waste of time and money to see a Psychiatrist, visit a Psychologist, drop in on a Mental Therapist, seek a Fortuneteller, or call a “Queer” Doctor or Professor to ascertain what you should do to find a solution to your transgender mentality. The “discovery” is at your fingertips.

Wherever you are, at home, in bed, out for dinner, in a restroom at a ball game, or on a mountain hike, privately pull down your underclothes and take a look at your reproductive organs. What do you see, a female organ or male organs? Do you see anything that resembles what you think you are? If not, simply return to a state normality and enjoy your future years as God created you—yes, He did create you. And you are no more a “half-and-half” human than the elephant is a “half-and-half” animal.—Buff.​
 
I appreciate the candor and common sense found in your opening post (OP), but I couldn't help but notice an incongruence between that and the title: Nowhere in your OP is there any discussion about the immoral angle that comes into play.
 
I find it so interesting that gender incongruence is no longer classified as a mental disorder—gender identity disorder—by either the DSM-5 (2013) or the ICD-11 (2022), even though it is clearly a case of someone's internal state (their self-perception) not aligning with external reality (their sex at birth). What is that if not disordered thinking? If I believe that I am Elvis Presley but reality evidentially says otherwise, is that not indicative of a mental disorder? Traditionally, psychiatry defines a mental disorder as a condition in which internal states (beliefs, perceptions, or identity structures) are discordant with external reality or cause functional impairment. Under that rubric, delusional misidentifications, body dysmorphia, and anorexia nervosa are classified as disorders precisely because subjective experience conflicts with the body's objective condition. (See note at bottom.)

The DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association) and ICD-11 (World Health Organization) committees did not discover that gender incongruence is no longer a mental disorder, they simply decided it should no longer be classified as one. Why? There were no new biological or psychological discoveries that would warrant reclassifying the diagnosis on evidentiary grounds. Instead, both said the justification was driven largely by sociopolitical and ethical considerations pertaining to social impact, stigma reduction, and human rights.

The APA said they changed the DSM for reasons pertaining to social impact—because how it defines and diagnoses mental disorders "impacts how people see themselves and how we see each other" and can have a "stigmatizing effect" (2013, PDF). That really seems unrelated to diagnostic and clinical care. The WHO was even more explicit, saying the revision in the ICD was intended to avoid "labeling transgender identities as mental disorders," citing advocacy pressure from "a range of civil society organizations as well as the governments of several Member States and the European Union Parliament" (2016). The intersection of stigma and mental disorder diagnoses creates unique burdens, the WHO said. This is political and advocacy pressure related to legal status and human rights, not scientific or clinical evidence.
  • ICD-11 = International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision (effective January 2022).
  • DSM-5 = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (effective May 2013).


Note: It is dangerous to privilege inner self-conception over empirical embodiment. It is also why there is an overt asymmetry when it comes to so-called "conversion therapy." In contemporary policy, "conversion therapy" is defined as any attempt to change a person's internal life to align with external reality. But the same conceptual structure is not applied in reverse: Efforts to align the body with the self-perception—through hormones, surgeries, or social transition—are not defined as "conversion therapy," strangely enough, but as "gender-affirming care." It is a one-way street, an asymmetry that is ideological, not medical. It arises from the normative presupposition that internal self-identification is authoritative and external reality is subordinate and mutable. (Our narcissistic tendencies are pervasive and going unchecked.) For no reason that makes any sense to me (beyond spiritual rebellion against God), altering the body to match the self is deemed therapeutic, but altering the self to match the body is deemed coercive.
 
I appreciate the candor and common sense found in your opening post (OP), but I couldn't help but notice an incongruence between that and the title: Nowhere in your OP is there any discussion about the immoral angle that comes into play.
The "immoral angle" is transgender-ism itself, for God created man to be man and woman to be woman. To violate that order by introducing a "transgender" species is the very opposite of what our God intended - and what our Creator has done.​
 
Christopher Gordon, “The New Reformation Catechism on Human Sexuality,” Reformed Perspective 41, no. 4 (June–August 2022): 11–21 (PDF).
 
Back
Top