Seattle shooting due to view of modern Israel?

[EarlyActs]

The pastor posted this a few days ago:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1948109409684443485

“Judea and Samaria belong to Israel; this is not a controversial statement.”

But is it constructive? The preacher of the Gospel has no reason to spend time on it. What did the apostles do that would make him think he needed to say so?

 

[EarlyActs]

Here's a few dots to connect:
1, the end of Joshua says all the promises to Abraham were fulfilled in the arrival in the land
2, Ps 105 says the same, but with including the Exodus
3, Dan 9 sees the destruction of the land a 2nd time in 490 years, the 1st century AD
4, in a secular sense, Israel's claim is above that of ancient pagan Canaanites, if that issue is where this modern issue is to be resolved. This does not seem to be the case, but rather it is about other 20th century decisions. But the modern Israel is not the one referred to in the NT. Which is why there is no interest in the land in the NT.