Eternally-Grateful
Born again child of God
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2025
- Messages
- 980
- Reaction score
- 354
- Points
- 63
- Location
- Ohio
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- US
- Marital status
- Married
I think Titus is clear.I hear a lot of word games played by works-salvationists. On a different Christian forum, one member continuously makes this claim: "We are not saved by works of the law or good works, but by the obedience of faith" implying we are saved by acts of obedience that are produced out of faith, which are good works, so his argument is moot. Another member stated: "It's not works of the law or works of merit but works of obedience that help to save us." I've heard all kinds of sugar-coated double talk (word games) from works-salvationists over the years.
In James 2:14 we read of one who says/claims (key word - profession of faith) he has faith but has no works (to evidence his claim). That is not genuine faith, but a bare profession of faith. So, when James asks, "Can that faith save him?" he is saying nothing against genuine faith, but only against an empty profession of faith/dead faith.
So, James does not teach that we are saved "by" works. His concern is to show the reality of the faith professed by the individual (James 2:18) and demonstrate that the faith claimed (James 2:14) by the individual is genuine. Simple!
Not by works of righteousness (good deeds) which we have done, but by his mercy he saved us.
A work of merit is a work of merit. and will be rejected by God as payment for sin